In september 2022 Chile held a referendum about a new constitution, an ecological, or a green one. This book was published in the time leading up to that referendum, and takes a clear stand with the new constitution. I hadn’t heard about this until I came across this book, but I thought it was a curious idea.
In many ways the author makes a good case for an ecological constitution. The basic idea is that mankind isn’t above nature, isn’t above the land, the animals, the water, and so on. It’s part of it. So the constitution has to take nature into account, and therefore not be completely human centric.
It really is a good idea for a constitution. A great idea, in fact. The book itself is pretty good, very well argued, well built up, but perhaps a little too academic. I think it would have been better if it had used the method that one can so often see in journalistic nonfiction, where the reader gets a sense of place, a sense of characters, and is put right in the middle of the story. The way it stands is a little dry at times.
But I like it just the same. It was a fascinating attempt to bring nature into the constitution, but unfortunately the Chilean nation rejected it in the referendum. And it wasn’t even a close call, 62% rejected it while 38% vote for it. Still, a very interesting read.