Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

The Concept of Prayer

Rate this book
Many contemporary philosophers assume that, before one can discuss prayer, the question of whether there is a God or not must be settled. In this title, first published in 1965, D. Z. Phillips argues that to understand prayer is to understand what is meant by the reality of God. Beginning by placing the problem of prayer within a philosophical context, Phillips goes on to discuss such topics as prayer and the concept of talking, prayer and dependence, superstition and the concept of community. This is a fascinating reissue that will be of particular value to students with an interest in the philosophy of religion, prayer and religious studies more generally.

178 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 1981

Loading...
Loading...

About the author

D.Z. Phillips

56 books9 followers
Dewi Zephaniah Phillips, usually cited as D.Z. Phillips, is recognized for his work in the philosophy of religion and other philosophical disciplines. He was also a proponent of preserving the Welsh language.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
4 (40%)
4 stars
3 (30%)
3 stars
2 (20%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
1 (10%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Tylor Lovins.
Author 3 books20 followers
December 19, 2012
This book was very useful especially if one is thinking about how to go about doing a Wittgensteinian analysis of religious belief. Although this book is one of Phillips's immature works (in the sense that he retracts at least a few of his statements about language games and religious belief), it is certainly the best place to begin if one wants to see what has been of yet, I think, the best fruits of a Wittgensteinian analysis of religion.
The main import of this book is probably in Phillips's understanding of prayer as something one undertakes as an attitude towards (1) all explanations, (2) the sum of all one's moral endeavors, and (3) contingency. He carries through this analysis in light of Wittgenstein's distinction between superstition and genuine religious belief.
I think it is worth the read for anyone who wants to think about prayers in a coherent, philosophical way.
Displaying 1 of 1 review