Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Rethinking Generosity: Critical Theory and the Politics of Caritas

Rate this book
Romand Coles explores how we might understand and motivate generosity in a world in which no theological or secular position can claim absolute privilege for itself. He argues that unless our generosity is fashioned in the context of a radical receptivity, we tend to undermine our best aspirations. In the agonistic dialogic character of human beings, Coles argues, is a practice of receptive generosity, an openness to the specific being and voices of others, and a concern to give them something of value. Ethical relations between people should be animated by receptive generosity, he suggests, but they are always fallible and rarely free of a tragic aspect that calls us critically to renew our efforts.
The word caritas is taken by Coles to signify a transfiguration of what he thinks is most worthy in the Christian tradition. 'Post-secular caritas' refers to the hope of advancing this project through more receptive efforts to engage others, in ways less prone to violence, imperialism, and assimilation than are many aspects of Christianity and liberalism.
In support of his theory, Coles offers provocative readings of Kant, Nietzsche, Adorno, and Habermas, bringing Adorno's ethical stance critically to bear upon the discourse ethics of Habermas. He then considers practical political implications, particularly for relations in civil society and among progressive social movements.

Paperback

First published October 1, 1997

Loading...
Loading...

About the author

Romand Coles

9 books3 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
1 (33%)
4 stars
0 (0%)
3 stars
1 (33%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
1 (33%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
14 reviews40 followers
January 3, 2017
Coles is obsessed with 4 words: "engendered", "recalcitrant", "solicit", and "agnostic". I don't think he is aware how much he repeats those words, in a very distracting way! And his language is quite inaccessible at times. But a valuable and interesting analysis.
Displaying 1 of 1 review