Sweetman attempts to rehabilitate Lord Raglan, Britain's much-maligned Crimean War commander, arguing him a skilled military leader. Sweetman shows that Raglan was a man of sterling character, a tireless administrator and a smooth diplomatist who smoothed over testy relations with his French and Turkish allies. He fails to convincingly defend Raglan's tactical incompetence, however, and elides his subject's less admirable traits like anti-Indian snobbery. Amusingly, he quotes Raglan raging against "newfangled" reformists while Master of the Ordnance, then blames Raglan's Crimean travails on an antiquated military system! Connecting the two doesn't occur to Sweetman. Worth reading but a mixed success.