Honestly, I really wish I could give this book more stars; both because I totally agree with the general thesis ("no need for gurus") and because I know Clark (not well, but did practice with him in Woodstock for awhile).
However, while I too reject the need -- or even the so-called benefit -- of having a 'guru,' I do believe that the hyper-individualistic "my truth," stance can lead to self-delusion. I've seen it way too many times! AND, I've experienced it at times when I practiced completely on my own. There is often the real need and benefit of the 'friend along the way.'
Also, Strand here seems overly 'quietistic' in his understanding of meditation. I really think we do a dis-service to others when we say that meditation is simply "being here now," which is ultimately what Strand comes back to repeatedly. I also think he misunderstands that his own perspective from which he is -- let's face it -- teaching is also "ideological." He often says things like: "...I had to leave him and his monastery in order to experience the present moment free of all ideological constraints." There simply is NO SUCH THING! What Strand seems not to understand is that he is speaking FROM a particular -- not at all unique, and not at all harmless -- ideological perspective. It seems that many meditators, buddhists, yogis (whatever and however they define themselves) think that they can go beyond "ideology." They seem to think "ideology" a bad thing. What is "bad" is unconscious/hidden/denied ideology. Practice can -- and I believe should make visible our ideology so that we can verify if is is 'true' and helpful; liberation is to at least some extent, conscious ideology.