Théo d'Or ’s Reviews > Revolution in Poetic Language > Status Update
Théo d'Or
is 7% done
" Le langage poètique est une pratique signifiante qui, en tant que telle, ne peut être comprise que dans le cadre d'une thèorie gènèrale du signe et du sens ".
Hmm.... Je dirais qu'il utilise une partie du langage qui n'est pas logique ni ordinaire, mais crèative et rebelle.
De plus, est-il nècessaire le sens en poèsie ? Ou en peinture?
— Feb 17, 2024 07:39AM
Hmm.... Je dirais qu'il utilise une partie du langage qui n'est pas logique ni ordinaire, mais crèative et rebelle.
De plus, est-il nècessaire le sens en poèsie ? Ou en peinture?
2 likes · Like flag
Théo d'Or ’s Previous Updates
Théo d'Or
is 29% done
- If I were a zephyr, I would zephyrize.
Zephyrize my fantasies with a single word.
- Cheese.
— Feb 20, 2024 02:03PM
Zephyrize my fantasies with a single word.
- Cheese.
Comments Showing 1-8 of 8 (8 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
hcaprice
(new)
Feb 18, 2024 03:19PM
why shouldn't art have a meaning? maybe an estetic purpose, but that would still have a meaning...
reply
|
flag
There is a slight difference in expression here, Sailor . Art, in its myriad forms, is a great realm where meaning usually enriches our understanding of a piece, but, in my view, it is not Always mandatory. Just think about Picasso's paintings. While some of his works carry explicit messages , others simply let the viewers interpret them absolutely freely. And that's equally valid in writing , Nabokov is a perfect exemple. In essence, art need not always wear a label. It can simply be a dance of colors/words that resonates uniquely with each viewer/ reader. Of course, I don't expect my vision to be embraced entirely. Subjectivism is sovereign in the realm of art, objectivism is nothing but an intruder in this realm, like an ax in the surgeon's hand.
oh now it's more clear, there must've been a few problems with communication: either my french sucks(which is true) or i misunderstant the question(which is also true). thank u, now that I'm having a proper idea i have to admit that what you think is very reasonable!
Yes, but is nothing wrong in your vision too. That art must have a meaning, is a general concept. The meaning, however, is not a universal one, but one perceived by each individual.
my observation was pretty common(banal, i don't know how to express it properly), considering the opinion you had. it's obvious that everything has a meaning
Your observation is not pretty common, but as pertinent as possible. The thing is - while not everything comes with a ready-made purpose, we humans find meaning by attaching our own feelings, memories, and interpretations to everyday's things. Imagine, for example, you wake up, and the first thing you do is brew a cup of coffee . The coffee itself doesn't have a built-in purpose. It's just a liquid. But for you, that cup of coffee means waking up, feeling cozy, and starting your day. You have already created a meaning where perhaps someone else wouldn't find nothing. It is right, everything must have a reason or a cause, but many times, the cause is very difficult to express.
interesting, cause I've just taken my morning espresso and i really enjoyed it
Et voilà ! Non é appagante ?
