Aaron Thomas’s Reviews > Sodomy and Interpretation: Marlowe to Milton > Status Update

This book is frustrating the hell out of me. It lacks specificity and continues to conflate terms like "catamite" and "sodomite" and to treat both as though they are equivalent to something called "homoerotics". It isn't that I object to ANY notion of non-normative subjectivity in Early Modern England, but I would like a bit more specificity and fewer comparisons to our own way of thinking about sexual subjectivities