Pulp Fiction discussion

This topic is about
The Grifters
Group Reads
>
June 2012 - The Grifters
date
newest »

Watching the movie doesn't count :P I've not read the book but I did enjoy the movie so I'm looking forward to this one too

I collect all of his books and would have got this book for the group read but im leaving for vacation and will be back late July. Not alot of cheap internet, book talks online in Somalia ;)


Yeah its not too safe exactly but im going to the calmest parts that is North eastern Somalia. The parts the trouble is pirates that hijack rich western company ships. Im visiting my aunt otherwise not much reason to go the old homeland these days.
I would prefer to take with me Jim Thompson noir books to the trip but i dont have any unread at home, which sucks :D

Yeah its not too safe exactly but im going to the calmest parts that is North east..."
Stay safe and enjoy Puntland. I found it quite a lovely place, but that was two decades ago.

Thank you to everyone who voted for this book, it may have taken me months or years to finally get around to reading a Jim Thompson if it hadn't been for you.
Everyone is so morally bankrupt in this book, I love it.
Roy Dillon's narration subtly foreshadowing the denouement alone makes this worth re-reading just so you can pick up on the extra existentialist undertones.

I like that Roy was torn between going straight and keeping up the grift, that he thought he really had a choice in the matter. Everything he was came from the grift, and everything he touched was corrupted by it: unsullied Carol, a would-be holiday away.
Would he have gone through with actually working the straight job if events had not cut his life short? Or would he have waffled again, or grown bored of the 9-to-5?
The Oedipus complex hints at the end really tie things together psychologically in a satisfyingly unsettling way.
Good book, recommended.

The pace was a blaze and the charcters multi dimensional. The subtle insertion of incestous overtones gave it so much depth and layering.
I will certainly read more Thompson. Good choice!

The only other Thompson novel I've read is The Killer Inside Me, which I like more, but this is outstanding also. Does Thompson always hit home runs when he writes?


http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/...
This was my first Jim Thompson - I've got to read more if THE GRIFTERS is any indication!


Totally agree with you. THE GRIFTERS is one of my all-time favorite movies. Starting with the opening credits and the music, which is fantastic. A split screen with the 3 main characters. 5 stars on any planet!



Tom, I haven't seen the 60s movies you mention. Are they docudramas? documentaries? Sorry, Led Zep and Woodstock weren't my thing ... I'm more of a Round About Midnight kinda gal.


Your factoid about mixing of time periods and styles is very interesting. I admit I was never certain about when it was specifically set and i guess that is the genius of Frears. It's a wonderful movie and it still works because of that timeless aspect Frears gave it.
As for Mike Figgis, the man is a total film making machine. You mentioned Timecode, which I loved, it goes beyond simple run of the mill split screen. it's a revolution in cinematic narrative techniques that sadly worked better as an experiment than it did in entertainment. His book Digital Filmmaking discusses this and for me works as a manifesto for anti-Michael Bay style movies.
Enough about that, you also made an interesting point about Leaving Las Vegas. I've never considered it as noir but it certainly seems to have a touch of the David Goodis about it. If you feel like starting a new topic i'm sure it would make for an interesting discussion.




Well, I don't know if these qualify as noir (probably not) there's always Anatomy of a Murder (Duke Ellington) and Man with the Golden Arm (Elmer Bernstein). And then there's Clockwork Orange, where Stanley Kubrick (famous for inserting classical music into his films) used various classical composers (Purcell, Rossini, Beethoven and Elgar) Kubrick is fabulous ... but that's another discussion thread, I guess.

Okay, she was a bad mother but Roy was no angel. And what about the Annette Benning character? Could we argue a bit about who's the femme fatal? Mom or ... sorry, blanking on the AB character's name?

Okay, she was a bad mother..."
It's possible to have two femme fatales right? But then again you might argue that neither of them were because all three characters were selfish and out entirely for themselves, always hiding something, always on the con, damn the consequences to the others no matter how you might feel about them.



Pro/Ant-agonist: Richard, I don't know about your drama teacher's assertion, but I wonder if there's not a common approach in noir where everyone is a mixture of both. (Part of the issue here is, I think, whether the protagonist/antagonist reference is meant as a "good guy/bad guy" reference or as a "driver of the story"/"provider of conflict" reference.
In some of the noir I read, anyway, it seems like the real conflict is with fate, and in that way they read more like traditional tragedies. Nobody really expects Roy to come out of the story alive, do they? Isn't it true that that we kind of know going into a lot of these stories that the "hero" (there's another loaded term for you) will end up injured, scarred, dead, or otherwise worse off by the time the action is over?

David you make good points about the Pro/Antagonist. I think of the Protagonist as the world-weary character like Bogey and Mitchum in so many noir films. That seems to be missing in The Grifters. And yes, you know Roy is headed for a bad end.

Richard/David: great question, who was the antagonist? My superficial answer is Bobo Justus who ran the racetrack grift (that employed Lily) is an antagonist. But when I think further, none of the characters seemed to have any wish to get out of the game. Lily stridently argued she was too old to leave the grift. And we know Roy is her offspring, she brought him up in her shadow. As a young man, he still thinks he can outrun the game just as his mother must have thought when she was young. Myra is looking to relive the old glory days of the long con and make Roy her partner. So my take is that it's not society, it's each character's character. They are grifters, they know nothing better. So they play their own antagonist(s).

Very good points

Richar..."
I thought of Bobo too but I think your second choice is better. It's the common character of the grifters themselves.

Susan: I just watched a scene from Angel Face on YouTube. It looked reeealllly good. Must try to watch.

So true. Sometimes the "antagonist" isn't a person. Sometimes it's nature, a struggle to survive a dangerous environment." Or an oppressive society, like totalitarianism, or a ruthless company, like Erin Brockovitch. But in the Grifters, it may be each character's inner demons ... the inability to give up the grift.
And yes, do watch Angel Face. You'll enjoy it for sure!
I'm looking forward to delving once more into the murky world of noir, let us know what you think of this book.