Children's Books discussion
Themes, Topics & Categories
>
Favorite Books Made into Movies--Good, Bad & Ugly
message 1:
by
Ronda
(last edited Dec 21, 2008 08:45AM)
(new)
Dec 21, 2008 08:40AM

reply
|
flag

Saw the Disney cartoon first, loved it. The movie led me to the book. Love it too.
Freaky Friday by Mary Rodgers
Saw the old Disney movie first, which led me to the book. Read it, loved it and then saw the re-make. My son and I both loved that one.
Pollyanna by Eleanor H. Porter
Saw the movie as a child which led me to the book. The movie was not my favorite, but as it led me to the book--I was happy to see it.
Eragon by Christopher Paolini
Read the book and loved it. Too many of my students, ones who read the book THEN saw the movie, HATED the movie--so I haven't bothered to see that one. Oddly enough, students who saw the movie first, THEN read the book, were ok with the movie. Funny how that works.
Matilda by Roald Dahl
Saw the movie first and loved it. It led me to the book, which I also loved.
The Witches by Roald Dahl
Read the book first and loved it--the descriptions of the witches and their itchy scalps still gives me a chuckle (and shiver). The movie was fun too, but I'll say I got more out of the book.
Spiderwick Chronicles by DiTerlizzi and Black
My son and I read the books (the first series) first and loved them. When we went to see the movie, my son was totally disappointed b/c they'd changed so much. I thought the movie was pretty fun, BUT not if you were expecting it to be true to the books.

Abigail wrote: "The first two movies I ever saw in the theater, as a young child, were The Secret of NIMH and The Black Stallion, both based on children's books.
I loved The Secret of NIMH, although Robert O'Brie..."


I think the Harry Potter books have been done very well so far. I was equally pleased with Lion, Witch, and the Wardrobe. I wasn't as happy with the Series of Unfortunate Events movie. Trying to cram three books in one movie. I understand why, but it did not translate the books well I don't think. I'm about to go take my son to see Tale of Desperaux. We'll have to see what I think. =)

Thanks for the info. Our entire 5th grade went to see Tale of Despereaux right before the holidays. Reviews from the kids were mixed. I wonder if it's kind of like Spiderwick was for me and for my son. Had we not read the books, the movie as a standalone would have been easier to like--but having read the books, and coming in with certain expectations--my son hated the movie. I enjoyed it, but had to separate the movie from the book in my head. If you see Tale of Desp., please share your thoughts.

But I enjoyed it quite a bit. I want to reread the book now though to compare it. My three-year-old wasn't as enthralled as I had hoped, but he wasn't bored out of his mind either. (I have a feeling that if we had gone across the hall to Madagascar 2, he would have been ecstatic.)




"Anne of Green Gables" was very good, I keep waiting for a remake.
How could I forget "National Velvet"? Loved the movie!
Harry Potter and the Chronicles of Narnia movies, were excellent.


I've got to read Coraline. I get so many kids who ask for scary stories or ghost stories and the Scary stories to tell in the dark series is always circulating.

I forgot about Holes too.
For YA readers there's
Blood and Chocolate I have neither read the book nor have I seen the movie--but my high school kids who loved the books were excited about the movie.
Twilight by Stephanie Meyer. I've even got 5th graders who are reading their older sibs' copies of this book. I thought the movie was ok--better than I expected it to be.
Speak based on the book by the same title by Laurie Halse Anderson

How do you make italics and underline here, for some reason I can't figure it out, and I'm not exactly puter-stupid.

Before what you want in italics or bold or underlined put
< i > or < b < or < u >
then with no spaces before or after put your text then after (still no spaces) put
< / i > or < / b > or < /u >
I've done bold and italics this way. I assume it also works with underlining.
Edit: It does. And using spaces does not stop it. ;-)
Edit again: There: That should work. No spaces with the i, b, u codes.


I forgot about Holes too.
For YA readers there's
Blood and Chocolate I have neither read the book nor ha..."
Ronda wrote: "Luann wrote: "Ronda, I really liked Coraline. It was just creepy enough without going too far. I have also recommended it to quite a few students who have read all of the Scary Stories to Tell in..."
The movie for "Blood and Chocolate" is terrible. The only thing that is the same as the book is that some of the characters have the same names and there are werewolves. The plot and outcome of the story are not even remotely the same.

I forgot about Holes too.
For YA readers there's
Blood and Chocolate I have neither ..."
It's frustrating when there's a popular book that gets made into a movie--but badly. Most of my students who read Eragon first HATED the movie. Then there was the move that was SUPPOSED to be based on Susan Cooper's Dark is Rising. I noticed they changed the name of the movie after a while--glad they did. The movie might have been ok in its own right, but it was very different from the book.

Some more I'd forgotten about:
The Golden COmpass book by Pullman, controversial movie AND book
Howl's Moving Castle book by Dianna Wynne Jones, animated movie--haven't read the book but hear that it's VERY different from the movie.

I haven't gotten feedback from my teacher who requested the Old Yeller movie yet--but I know that I can't keep the book on the shelf. I also can't keep The BFG on the shelf.

Some more I'd forgot..."
I've seen both movies and read both books. The animated BFG is not far off from the book. The other giants can be a bit scary for younger children.
Howl's Moving Castle the movie was a bit different from the book. They left out my favorite character....but it wasn't horrible.
It's funny what you say about Eragon. My mom got the movie on Netflix and was saying how good it was. I Said, "you've got to be kidding." Then I asked her if she had read the book, which she hadn't. I hated the movie...and then even more because I liked the 2nd and 3rd books. They destroyed it so badly that they can't make a 2nd movie. I was yelling at the TV and my husband told me he wasn't going to watch movies with me where I have read the book anymore. :)

Shiloh, Newberry award winning book and half-decent movie
Charlotte's Web, Newberry award book and animated and live action movie.
Misty of Chincoteague, Newberry award book, own the movie, but haven't seen it yet.
Ella Enchanted, Newberry book, Movie a bit off from the book, but still funny.
Frog and Toad Together, Newberry award book, older movie...kind of almost a claymation style, but it sticks exactly to the book
Bridge to Terabithia, Newberry book, not sure what the movie is rated though.
From the Mixed-Up Files of Mrs. Basil E. Frankweiler, Newberry Winner, have the movie but haven't seen it. It has Lauren Bacall in it.
Island of the Blue Dolphins, Newberry award winner, not sure about the movie rating.
Mrs. Frisby and the Rats of NIHM, Newberry book, animated movie...one of my favorites as a kid.
My Side of the Mountain, Newberry award...99% positive there is a movie for this.
The Tale of Despereaux, Newberry book, one of my favorites, movie just came out in theatres
A Wrinkle in Time, Newberry winner, haven't seen the movie, but I'm pretty sure there is one.
Matilda, great Roald Dahl book, think the movie is PG.
Stewart Little, great book, movie is ok, but I think it is G.
A Series of Unfortunate Events, books 1-3 in the movie, movie might be rated PG pr PG 13.
Inkheart, older reader, movie in theatres.
Harry Potter series, but I think most of the movies would be too scary.
Ummmm....I know I can think of more. I'm really into the Newberrys...I'll keep thinking.

GREAT list!!! Thanks for sharing. I know my teachers will be happy about this (I certainly am!) Are you, by any chance, a librarian?

Saw the Disney cartoon first, loved it. The movie led me to the book. Love it too.
Freaky Friday by Mary Rodgers
Saw the old Disney movie first, which led me to..."
I totally agree with each of your assessments.


Not a librarian, but I taught at a private school that had a poor library and I helped the librarian stock up the shelves. I am an avid reader and I have two young readers at home so I read a lot of children's books as well. With my oldest daughter we are going through the Newberry's along with her personal selections, and with my youngest we are going through the Caldecott's.
My kids can't live without our weekly trip to the library. You would think they had no books at home, instead of the overflowing shelves.

I tried to watch the movie and didn't get through it. I loved the Dark Is Rising series so much as a child that I was thrilled when I heard about the movie--at first. I'm just glad they renamed the movie b/c--I don't know that I would even say it was "based on" the book--more like "inspired by"? I think film makers have an obligation to the authors AND readers when they choose to make a film based on a book. I'm usually more excited about a movie when I hear that the film makers are actually consulting with an author--and actually listening. It's ok for the movie to be different--it's a different medium--but I do expect a movie to be true to an author's vision if it's going to be "based on". Interesting. I've never tried to put that into words before.

Maybe I should start doing that more! I am almost always disappointed in the movies if I've read the books first--unless, as in another comment--the movie makers have really worked with the authors. Seems like that doesn't happen often enough.
Has anyone else heard about the "Where the Wild Things Are" movie to be released this year??? I'm really curious about this one--not really sure what all they are adding to the story to make it into a feature-length film. I loved the book and illustrations, and certainly it is ripe for the imagination of Hollywood costumers/CGI-designers, but I'm not really sure how well it will translate... I think it needs to be in the right hands, for sure.

I hadn't heard about this yet. Thanks for sharing (and ditto the feelings about them getting the right people to do this).


Hi Tahleen. We went to see Despereaux yesterday and I wish we had waited for the DVD. My kids thought the pacing was too slow -- I judge by their fidgeting. And I disliked how it deviated from the book. I mean what was the veggie guy all about?
Glad you enjoyed it though. And I agree that Coraline looks good.


Nope, not in the book. Neither was there a sailing ship, or the rat amphitheater.
And I can understand why they would have to change some elements from the book, but I have to say that I don't understand not the direction they took things.
And Chandra, I think you are right on the button. There wasn't enough character development. I felt the king's sorrow more than the princesses, for example.

I enjoyed the spiderwick chronicles, Narnia and the Harry potter series. I'm really looking forward to the movie Inkheart.

My brother just sent me a link to the Wild Things trailer (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--N9kl...). Not to sway anyone's opinion before they watch it, but I'm less than impressed . . . :(

I am a HUGE fan of book to movie productions, simply because I think stories that are books orignally, have the best plots.
I was so stunned at Narnia: LWW. I thought it was an amazing adaptation that not only covered every aspect of the book, but added MORE to it. It has an advantage because the book was only about 100 pages and a standard screenplay is 90 pages. When you're working with books like Harry Potter: GoF then it takes some more planning.
I love the HP movies also, don't get me wrong. I always get a bit miffed when people complain that they "took too much out". Well, you try taking 600+ pages down to 90! Haha.
I was so stunned at Narnia: LWW. I thought it was an amazing adaptation that not only covered every aspect of the book, but added MORE to it. It has an advantage because the book was only about 100 pages and a standard screenplay is 90 pages. When you're working with books like Harry Potter: GoF then it takes some more planning.
I love the HP movies also, don't get me wrong. I always get a bit miffed when people complain that they "took too much out". Well, you try taking 600+ pages down to 90! Haha.
Now that I'm thinking about it... the new version of Charlotte's Web was amazing. I think it far exceeds the cartoon feature that I grew up watching.
City of Ember was OKAY. I think I was mostly dissapointed by the performances of the young actors.
Indian in the Cupboard (1990s-ish) was a great adaptation!
Holes is a wonderful, wonderful film. They did an A+ job with that one.
Abigail wrote: "I'm always both saddened and confused when film-makers take an excellent story and butcher it... I understand that they are different mediums, and that some change is inevitable - but to add unnecessary elements, or willfully change the basis premise, really irritates me. At that point, you should just write your own story, and film it..."
That is basically what they do.... hence the small subtitle usually splashed into the trailer "BASED on the beloved novel", or some form of the same.
It's like how the horror films always say BASED on a true story. Based is the key word. As in, at SOME POINT, SOMEWHERE there was POTENTIALLY a little girl who COULD HAVE had a mental disorder that MIGHT HAVE been MISTAKEN for a possession. BAM! True story ;]
That is basically what they do.... hence the small subtitle usually splashed into the trailer "BASED on the beloved novel", or some form of the same.
It's like how the horror films always say BASED on a true story. Based is the key word. As in, at SOME POINT, SOMEWHERE there was POTENTIALLY a little girl who COULD HAVE had a mental disorder that MIGHT HAVE been MISTAKEN for a possession. BAM! True story ;]
RE: INKHEART. I saw the movie and found it entertaining but I was not overly impressed, I'm afraid. I felt that they left out or condensed a lot from the book and, while I agree that this usually must be done for movie adaptations, I was more annoyed with how the FEEL of the film seemed different. It was, and I hate to say this, more "childish" in my opinion. Basta and Capricorn were more one-dimensional, typical villains. Mo seemed rather secondary, much as I love Brendan Frasier and was so excited to see his portrayal since Funke based her character of Mo off of him anyway! I thought they got Meggie right, at least, and Dustfinger was good. But, they changed aspects of his character, too and the ending is different!!! I don't want to include any spoilers for those who haven't seen the film or read the book, but there were just lots of little details missing... :-( It was still a decent and entertaining film, I just wanted something... More. My husband, who saw the film with me, enjoyed it and it prompted him to listen to the audiobook version, which he really liked. Now that he's "read" the book, though, he is annoyed with the movie in retrospect, haha! :-p He was especially annoyed when the book ended and it was not the same as the film!!! Anyway, just my two-cents but I would still advocate seeing the movie, just beware it leaves out a lot in terms of style and feel compared to, say, Harry Potter adaptations which, even though they had to abridge for the film, I felt captured the feel overall from the books (with the exception of Azkaban--don't get me started on that one, Alfonso!)
Yes, the last HP book will be two films. That should be... interesting! I'm curious to see where they'll "end" the first installment.
I LOVED Azkaban the book and felt that the movie missed out on so many points (especially the humor) of the book--it was so dark and added needless things, like the weird talking-shrunken-head! :-x I felt that at least Thewlis (sp?) did a good job with Lupin even if he didn't look quite how I'd pictured him in the book.
I LOVED Azkaban the book and felt that the movie missed out on so many points (especially the humor) of the book--it was so dark and added needless things, like the weird talking-shrunken-head! :-x I felt that at least Thewlis (sp?) did a good job with Lupin even if he didn't look quite how I'd pictured him in the book.
Hi guys! Because I loved this topic so much I started a group dedicated to it! Take a look and join!
http://www.goodreads.com/group/show/1...
http://www.goodreads.com/group/show/1...
Kathryn wrote: "Yes, the last HP book will be two films. That should be... interesting! I'm curious to see where they'll "end" the first installment. "
I've heard they'll end part 1 right after Ron walks out on Hermione and Harry.
I've heard they'll end part 1 right after Ron walks out on Hermione and Harry.
Abigail wrote: "It is as if the script-writer and film-maker want to "leave their mark," and do something a little different, and don't really care if the choices they make adversely effect the integrity of the characters or story. Like I said, at that point you should just dream up your own story"
You're absolutely correct, which is why all we can do is hope for a producer and director who want to be faithful to the book.
You're absolutely correct, which is why all we can do is hope for a producer and director who want to be faithful to the book.