Fantasy Aficionados discussion

This topic is about
Nightlife
Group Reads Archive
>
March 2012 Urban Fantasy Group Read: Nightlife
date
newest »

message 2:
by
Danielle The Book Huntress
(last edited Mar 02, 2012 10:59AM)
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars


My copy came in a few days ago but I'm going to try to finish The Hundred THousand Kingdoms first.



I got mine used from Amazon.


What I like... Well, while the book has some romance in it, it stays in the back ground and doesn't overwhelm the story. The story is (as noted) dark, but it's not hopeless (a lot of that comes from the interplay between the brothers). There are interesting characters and interesting twists on existing "mythical" characters.
What I don't like? Well...the new-takes mentioned above on mythical characters don't always work. Another thing (view spoiler) I'm not overly fond of what I suppose I'd call the crudity here. The darkness of the story is separate from this aspect. You'll see what I mean if you read the book.
All in all however I like these pretty well.

Hilarious.

My focus and the best thing about the book to me was the relationship between the brothers. I find family relationships in fiction very fascinating, especially close siblings, since I am very close to my sister.
So for me, the bromance was the focus and the highlight of the book. And like Mike, I liked the interesting twist on traditional elf/faerie mythology and the infusion of other mythical creatures into a modern landscape--the highlight of urban fantasy to me.
This book found me in my sophomore years of reading urban fantasy and it blew me away.
I like this series more than Dresden (although I also love those books), but it's because I love the brothers' relationship and Dresden doesn't have that for me.

My focus and the best thing about the book to me was the relationship between the brothers. I find family relationships in fiction very fascinating, especially close siblings, ..."
Honestly, I thought the touch of romance was just that, a little tidbit to keep things interesting and provide tension in some key moments.

On the down side, Cal really bugged me. He came off as a whiny, sarcastic schlub, and I wanted Niko to hand him his head more than once.
Also, the profanity from Cal seemed forced and gratuitous. As I get older, I suppose it stands out more, but having said that, The Blues Brothers and My Cousin Vinny are a couple of my favorite movies, and both of those got and R rating pretty much solely for profanity. But the swearing from Cal seems almost tacked on to give him an edgy feel, rather than sounding like just the way he talks.


I notice the use of profanity in most books. Some authors (Stephen King) seem to think everyone uses profanity simply as a matter of course.





The prologue was interesting and all but I can't see it coming in the story...I just hope it will pick up soon.



I remember that happening to me the first time through, and I started skimming at that point. This time, I paid a little more attention to the writing and have to admit she did the (view spoiler) quite well. I believed the mix. Now I've gotten onto a roll, so I'm on to Nightlife



Scarlet, the author is actually a woman. I was surprised when I found out and I think it made me read the book from a little different of a perspective. It wasn't better or worse, it was just different. I wonder if Rob Thurman chose to use a stereotypically male name on purpose, or if she just always goes by Rob. I noticed in the About The Author "she" and "her" is not used and it seemed deliberate. There was also no picture. I also think it's interesting that she had a female character named George in the book. At first I definitely thought that George was going to be a boy, and when Cal started describing her I had to go back and reread it. I like it when authors challenge preconceptions.

The number of mythical/magical creatures they 'stumbled' upon yet we- normal human beings- have no clue about... I mean too many ideas that shouldn't fit in one book.
a woman?!!!!
that doesn't change my opinion of the book but it does give me a new perspective..next time I should check the author first.

I started liking it less at the point when the narrator changes. I hope that does not give away too much! (I don't know how to put up the spoiler hiders!)
In the later part of the book the fighting scenes were too detailed, but other important details were only implied, for example what exactly happened with George or Promise. Also, when reading a fantasy novel, I like it when there is also beauty in the magic, it can be a dangerous, deadly magic, but there should be moments of wonder too, or if not that, humour, but there was nothing like that in this book. Not for me in any case. Mind you I find a lot of Urban Fantasy too dark. I prefer writers like Charles De Lint, Patriccia Briggs or Robin Mckinnley.
What I did like was the relationship between the brothers and I also found the premise to be very original.
message 35:
by
carol., Senor Crabbypants
(last edited Mar 27, 2012 06:53AM)
(new)
-
rated it 3 stars


Oddly, that part didn't bother me very much. Although Thurman didn't go out of her way to explain it, it seems like a UF explanatory given that people turn the 'blind eye' to what they don't understand. Then a lot of the twisted/evil monsters were creatures of the dark/predators, so I certainly buy the part about preying on the 'invisible' people like the homeless.

Books mentioned in this topic
The Wolfen (other topics)Nightlife (other topics)
Anyone have some things to consider....Laurl?? :D