Harry Potter discussion
Websites
>
Harry Potter Haters Group
message 1:
by
Ashley
(last edited Aug 25, 2016 01:31PM)
(new)
Nov 03, 2007 06:17PM

reply
|
flag

It's one of the things people seem to do often, though. I see groups like that all of the time on Livejournal.








"To me, Harry started out as little more than a lens. A sympathetic lens to be sure (how can you not pull for The Boy Who Lived) whose chief function seemed to entail viewing and exploring the wizarding world and Hogwarts. He did this with the requisite curiosity and sense of wonder, but he didn’t have much in the way of personality. Harry seemed more defined by the crappy/mean things that happened to him, and the fact that he was the Chosen One, than by anything else. He listened to Dumbeldore. He was loyal to his friends. He tried hard. I found it all fairly annoying. Also annoying, was the way JK borrowed/used/stole so many tropes and themes from western mythological canon as well as the contemporary fantasy tale. I now believe this bothered me so because when HP began, I was at a very critical/analytical point in my writerly development, a somewhat obsessive phase wherien I was trying to figure out who was stealing what from whom, in terms of style, content, etc. I soon realized everyone was stealing from everyone. Then I was able to just relax and let myself enjoy the books.
Something else happened: Harry turned into a real character for me. Those same traits he had from the beginning came to include a bit of stubbornness, anger, and pride. There were real consequences to his adventures. He suffered losses. And I began to root for him.
Sure, I still rooted for ol’ Severus Snape. (I knew he would redeem himself in the end–just knew it!) The fact that SS’s character arc closed with so many definitive answers aside, you were kidding yourself if you thought JK was keeping him around for anything but the ultimate sacrifice. If you read carefully, the signs were there at the close of Half-Blood Prince. Of course I also rooted for Dobby and Neville, Luna and the Weasley twins. My fave bit players. They too got their chance to shine.
I really rooted for JK. Don’t blow it, we all sent out to her telepathically. Don’t kill him just to kill him–listen to Stephen King. So she did (listen to Steve, that is). Or maybe not–I’m still not sure. Was Harry technically dead, or just mostly dead? Need to go back and reread that second to last chapter again to clarify, and when Dumbledore appeared yet again to explain everything for Harry (and us) and make things right, this was clearly the way to go. That bit with the wands, hallows or horcruxes? Interesting, yes, but in the end it was the tried and true theme: does might make right? Another nod to T.H. White’s Once and Future King, The Lord of the Rings, and for the kids, Spiderman.
Of course Voldemort goes for the killing curse, of course Harry does his tried-and-true disarm spell, and the meticulously (and perhaps laboriously) plotted story of how wands function and choose their wielder comes full circle. It was a most satisfying climatic moment.
It’s the journey that defines the traveler, though, and Deathly Hallows certainly provided that. Made me wonder, could anyone edit JK at this point? I ask the same question of the aforementioned S. King–both of them are so famous, so successful, how do you as an editor, say, “Uh, yeah, Ms. Rowling, you want to go ahead and cut and summarize these middle 300 pages or so…” Come on, you know how you were kind of mentally pacing as Harry and Hermione wandered around aimlessly in their tent, waiting for the plot to kick in again. The whole hallows question and what they meant. Ron’s bitchy and very un-Weasley-like breakdown…
But JK has done this with all the books. It’s just that for this one, the finale, the stakes seemed higher. The subplots just weren’t as interesting, and we weren’t really exploring the wizarding world (something that sort of stopped with Order of the Phoenix, and an aspect of those early books I truly missed). One rather large and obvious point: we weren’t at Hogwarts. I would argue this threw JK off her game a bit with side stories.
At the same time, you had some real character development. Ron and Hermione have their spat. Dumbledore’s legacy is looking tarnished. And ol’ Harry is genuinely torn on which way to go, whom to trust, what to do. I was worried about how low he might fall before his inevitable triumph. I was worried about his belief in the big D. And on many levels, when I’m worried about a character that means I’m happy about the reading.
The question remains, could she have cut some pages? Yes, but let’s not begrudge her for it."
there's still more of his "critique" but it would be too long for this post and he's not really a harry hater.... or isn't he?


for the record, in my opinion, deathly hallows is the best culmination of a series that i have ever read.

If they haven't read them, they are wasting their time.





I agree Meghan, we an express our knowledge of the Harry Potter books by playing our 'games'.





i mean seriously. i like the way jo makes references to other mythologies cause i actually get it and it's kinda neat. she's not copying, for heavens sake!!!!!
i mean, it's ok to not like a book. i mean, it's not against the law or anything, you don't have to like harry potter. but they are just denouncing it and i'm just like, i'd like to see you write better than jo!
(you can tell i'm slightly miffed)

well i was looking at the discussions that they had and alot of the people on there were harry potter lovers in disguise...... weird.




i don't particularly like bananas myself... however, when you really hate something, it always feel good to rant!!!
i should make a group called david cook haters..... david cooks a big freak and yeah!! it feels good to rant about something/someone that you absolutely hate!! like i have this one friend and we spent like 2 hourse one day having an i hate david cook fest! it was really fun. and then i have this other friend and we had an I HATE _______ FEST!! (not going to say names)


ok, wait, my sister just told me. sry about that. oh, he's not all that good. i remember him now. i mean, there are much better people out there.
hey Gunjari i hate your friend because she likes David cook. no offense or anything...

yes he is a good singer...and he is hot and sexy...do not argue@!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!....do u have a problem if ur friend drools over pix of him??....u drool over archie's pix don't u??...so u can't complain...every girl's gotta have her own man!
in other words...shut ur fat face rachel..!but cute pic of archie...
ha ha ha. that was actually funny. and im not a dude! and actually i dont drool over pics of him! i drool over videos of him on his blog. lol
Books mentioned in this topic
Harry Potter Series Box Set (other topics)The Fellowship of the Ring (other topics)