The Readers Review: Literature from 1714 to 1910 discussion
The Dickens Project - Archives
>
Oliver Twist - Week Seven: Book 2, Chapters vi-ix
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Loretta
(new)
Nov 15, 2011 08:21AM

reply
|
flag
*

So hopefully, I will be back in the discussion by this weekend. Thought I would be back a week ago, but this time, I definitely think that I will be able to catch up.
I don't want people to think that I've abandoned the book.
I'm in the same boat. I need to play catch up. We were out for 6 days too. You must be in New England. My poor hubby. It's his first New England winter. What a welcome!

I'm in Connecticut. And your poor husband. This might be his first - and last - New England winter. ;)

Zulfiya wrote: "I am nearly there:-) I do my catch-up reading on Fridays and Saturdays, and then I will be ready to post and discuss."
I'm jealous. I'm having house guests starting on Tuesday and just got back from being gone. I'm feeling like the To Do list is longer than can be done.
I'm jealous. I'm having house guests starting on Tuesday and just got back from being gone. I'm feeling like the To Do list is longer than can be done.


The country bumpkins reminded me of the Rustics in Midsummer Night's Dream. While Pickwick is a comedy with melodramatic interludes, Oliver Twist is a melodrama with comic interludes. (Speaking of Pickwick, I absolutely agree with Lynnm about Sam Weller in that BBC production, I was totally in love with him in a way I wasn't when I read the book.)
Oliver still seems very absent or thin as a character. Most of his conversation and feelings are reported in summary or 3rd person and he takes on the coloring of his surroundings. Dickens goes into great praise of the rural environment, equating its beauties with a sort of moral goodness, as opposed to the ugliness, crowding and dirt of London associated with Fagin and his ilk.
Oliver still seems very absent or thin as a character. Most of his conversation and feelings are reported in summary or 3rd person and he takes on the coloring of his surroundings. Dickens goes into great praise of the rural environment, equating its beauties with a sort of moral goodness, as opposed to the ugliness, crowding and dirt of London associated with Fagin and his ilk.

I can't agree more - Oliver is a little 'infuriating' pacifist. But it might be explained by the mores of his time - children were not decision-makers, even orphans.

'The rich man in his castle
The poor man at his gate
He made them high or lowly
And ordered their estate.'
Dickens praise of the rural environment was part of Victorian feelings and philosophy about the Sublime.
http://www.tate.org.uk/britain/exhibi...
Thanks for your input, Madge! We have missed you. And I admit Oliver isn't always passive, he fought back against Noah and he ran away to London. What I'm thinking of is how little his point of view is shown in this part of the story. He is talked about a lot by the narrator and by others, but has very few actual "lines" to speak in this part of the story. Many of the other characters have distinctive ways of speaking, but he doesn't.
Can you tell us about Victorian views of children? my sense is that they either saw children as little adults or something like wild animals to be domesticated by force.
Can you tell us about Victorian views of children? my sense is that they either saw children as little adults or something like wild animals to be domesticated by force.

http://www.victorianweb.org/genre/chi...
http://college.saintebarbe.pagesperso...
I think Oliver is shown as an 'empty' character because, as a foundling, he is devoid of an identity. His life throughout the book is dependent upon others and his innocence is exploited by them. In a way, his life only begins when the book ends.