Girls Like Us discussion
Debates
>
Celibacy vs. Open Sex
message 1:
by
Sky
(new)
Jul 14, 2011 11:25AM

reply
|
flag
*

I'm mean, I'm sure I could puzzle out what open sex means, but I've no idea what celibacy is. >>


(wikipedia)
Anyway. Yes to open sex. I mean, you have to try the different kinds before you decide on what to live with all your life.

I'd go with Sara on that one then; I don't believe in pre-martial sex, but I definitely don't believe in never getting married.

I don't know, I think it's never - ever having sex. But I think there are some ways to view it, like you can't have sex with more than one man all your life.

I don't believe in being celibate until marriage (unless that's your thing, then more power to you), but open sex to me means casual sex. I think sex in a loving relationship is fine, but casual sex has just never been for me.


See, THAT'S what I agree with. I don't believe in sex for fun; I believe in sex to create a family, with (and only with) your spouse.
Call me old fashioned; I call it morals.

I personally would never treat sex as a casual thing. I would never "hook up" with anyone. *shudders* However, I wouldn't necessarily postpone it until I'm married. I would do it before marriage if it was in a very serious relationship. But if I had any doubts at all, I wouldn't.
That said, I don't judge people who treat it more casually than I do. It's a very personal choice.


I'm mean, I'm sure I could puzzle out what open sex means, but I've no idea what celibacy is. >>"
Celibacy is just another word for abstinence

See, THAT'S what I agree with. I don't believe in sex for fun; I believe in sex to create a family, with (and only with) your spouse.
Call me old fashione..."
Then I guess I'm old-fashioned too...Lol

So...I definitely agree with Brigid straight out. Do what you want with your body really as long as you're comfortable with it. I really don't care what other people do with their bodies as long as they don't come stalking me...in the nude. O_O
But for me, I'll just wait and see. I think that love should come before sex though, in my case. I really don't care if other people just want to get banged one night. I feel more comfortable with love before sex. Heck, I don't even have to have sex. I could freaking become Mother Teresa and rule the world! Muhahahaha. But, that's me. See, do what you feel okay about doing. If you have sex before marriage, okay. You're not committing murder here.
But, you should never, on any occasion, be forced into sex. Then, I would accept in taking part in the act of slapping that ***********************************(THE STARS! THE STARS! WHY WON'T THEY STOP?)

Haha I just love the way you say ... everything. You are so funny and intelligent at the same time. :D

Haha I just love the way you say ... everything. You are so funny and intelligent at the same time. :D"
*bows*

Yeah, people can do whatever the heck they want with their bodies. But I mean, I just find some sort of comfort in the fact that a person wants to marry me and spend the rest of their life with me, before having sex. There are too many cases of "take the virginity and run", so even if I didn't have my particular moral beliefs, I don't know why you'd want that anyway. But eh, that's just me. I like the safety net. x)


Anyway...
I believe that whether you are married, engaged, dating, or whatever, as long as both you and your partner both feel ready, then it's your decision. What difference does it make if you have a ring on your finger or not?
Some people choose never to get married, but they live together as if they are - technically they are not married - does that mean they should abstain too?


50% of first marriages in this country end in divorce, so I don't think marriage necessarily says much about devotion. It really depends on the couple. An unmarried couple could be more dedicated to each other than another, married couple. It varies case by case, so I don't think it makes sense to say that married couples are automatically more in love with each other.
Mind you, I'm not saying that I think teenagers should go around having sex without knowing what they're doing. But I also hate how teenage girls who have sex are automatically labeled as sluts, when people might not know anything about them or their relationship.

I think sluts are more girls who sleep around.

True, "slut" refers more to girls who sleep around. But I feel like guys who sleep around get more support from their peers, like, "YOU GO MANNNN!" And girls get so catty when they hear another girl has had sex. Of course, this is kind of off-topic... XD

That, and my belief that you just shouldn't have sex before you're married, stemmed from my Mormon-osity.

Okay, what if you marry this guy but find out he's really bad in bed? Just a thought...
Oh dear god, I'm shallow. This whole time you guys were having a very professional debate, and then I think and end up ruining this.
*shakes head* I think that love should be more of the emotional thing than physical thing. If you only marry someone to get in his or her pants, then that surely says something about your devotion or perhaps CREEPINESS.
I think marriage is just putting the seal on the envelope really. I'm not saying that all couples are so deeply in love with each other that they never will break apart.
I think celibacy should apply to guys too to tell you the truth. So...who the hell let women wear the freaking chastity belt while men just winging their willy wonkas all over in the air.
Now, now, I'm not saying all men are freaking Bill Clintons here. I'm just saying that I'm all for equality.
I just think celibacy should be a decision and not a "thou must not sleep with man" type thing.
Think of it this way. If you got this new book, but you never read it and keep it locked away. I mean, it's bound to get dusty.
*bangs head on floor* *bangs head on floor*
Mind me please. That should not have had any sexual references in any way. Man, I have to stop listening to comedy on Pandora.
Now, I'm not saying teenage girls should go out and bang the next guy they see. No, it's nothing like that. I just think that, going with weird book analogy, maybe you'll find something new about yourself and learn something from that book. Okay, let's refer to this book as life. Life's all about making mistakes and learning from them. Sure, you don't want to get hurt. But does that mean you should hide away from yourself and others because you're scared of what you'll find?
What's wrong with me? Am I talking about love or sex? I don't get it. Why do I even comment in these debates? I don't even know what I'm saying.
I only meant to write a paragraph...
Anyway, I'm just trying to say that celibacy should be a decision. I think I said this before too. Oh come on, I thought for nothing...
And I wish celibacy was mutual because boy, is this world overpopulated? We're just waiting for a massive nuclear war, now are we?
*bangs head* *bangs head*
At least, I'm not banging Milo Ventimiglia even though I want to...figuratively speaking. Who's this Milo anyway? Nonsense, even though I come up with the best random names.

Okay, what if you marry this guy but find out he's really bad in bed? Just a thought...
Oh dear god, I'm shallow. This whole ti..."
LOL. You make me laugh so hard.
"So...who the hell let women wear the freaking chastity belt while men just winging their willy wonkas all over in the air."
*Extreme laughing fit*
Weirdly enough, I think you have a good point though. I mean, it would kind of suck to have sex on your wedding night only to discover that your newlywed was really ... awful. Not that marriage should be based on whether or not your spouse is good in bed, but at least if you do it beforehand you have time to ... practice. *headsmack*
And I don't blame you. Milo Ventimiglia is sexalicious. O_o .... I don't know where that word just came from.

But celibacy is a choice. I can't want to outlaw sex before marriage or anything, but it is my moral opinion.

But, I think the first time should be with someone you like who won't disappear the next day. Granted, that won't happen for everyone, but I think that would be the best choice.
However, protection should always be used unless you have the expressed goal of child creation. A good few people I know have become with child and then had to marry and ended up not being so happy with that arrangement...

I don't know how to put this to you. But if you tell a guy that sex is only for making families, it's like telling him you accidentally cut off his "willy wonka" and fed it to the neighborhood dog. Sure, sex is for making families. Got that. But sex is also for earnest physical love. Unless you're going to have a bazillion kids, I'm not sure the sex life of the two individuals is going to work out. In order to have a stable relationship, sex life is kind of necessary...in a marriage. I'm talking about in a marriage. So...yeah.


Sex shouldn't be the entire point of a relationship, but it is an important part.

Okay, what if you marry this guy but find out he's really bad in bed? Just a thought...
Oh dear god, I'm shall..."
Yeah, Brigid, we can awkwardly express our views together. Wait, I think it's just me.
Milo Ventimiglia is the stuff, man. Wait, did you watch Heroes then? Heh...random.

Of course, sex isn't everything in a relationship. But what if it was the other way around? What if your husband starts to not like you because of it? Well, maybe he still likes you, but he goes around banging secretaries every minute you don't look.
Okay, scratch that. Blah. I don't know what I'm saying. Truthfully, I kind of agree with you. I'm just joking with what I said in the previous paragraph. Celibacy. Sex before marriage. Both are the choices of the people. Whoa, I almost said ding-dongers. Sorry, I'm just having one of those weird, random days.

You ask the greatest questions. x)


Yes. That is a very good point.