Victorians! discussion
Archived Group Reads 2011
>
Madame Bovary Book 2 Chapter 9 - 15
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Marialyce (absltmom, yaya)
(new)
Jun 30, 2011 05:20AM

reply
|
flag
*

But then it is Emma who establishes this affair -- provides the formula with which it can take place. The riding lessons are accepted, the meetings in the clog-maker's hut, and finally her bold decision to make her own sneaking visits to his estate -- and things continue steadily from there. It becomes her show, so to speak, until ultimately she decides they should run away together.
I think this is really what stands out to me in the story. Rodolphe is really just a means of her transition to true adultery.

Has anyone read a background of Flaubert? He did not like this class of people and in the introduction to my book it said he didn't like women and raped one of his mothers maids! I'm disgusted if that's true.
I can't remember the words used but when talking about Rodolphe it's mention he was numb to feeling love because of how many women he used. I wonder if that is how Flaubert felt about himself?




At any rate, there is no Flaubert rape in the book and I'm sure there would have been if there was one. There is plenty about his liaisons with female prostitutes and with boys in Egypt. He had both epilepsy and syphillis. He was a great letter writer and there are masses of letters to his friends and to the one long-term mistress he had that are pretty explicit.
What I thought was interesting was that Flaubert, like Emma, got the most sexual pleasure from anticipation and imagination. It is interesting that Emma's passions are at their height when she is alone. This may have been what Flaubert may have meant when he said "Madame Bovary c'est moi."
This all sounds kind of tawdry now that I write it down. I think what really counts is the majesty of the prose. Flaubert would have wanted us to stay within the four walls of his meticulously crafted novel. He really believed the author should get out of the way.


I am not really online tonight, so I'll chat with you more tomorrow.


http://books.google.com/books?id=m3Rp...
Here is Robin Morgan's bio in her website:
http://www.robinmorgan.us/robin_morga...

http://books.google.com/books?id=m3Rp......"
Thanks Jamie!

This gives a slightly different portrait of Flaubert. I wonder if Morgan's being a radical feminist colored her view?
I have the the Barnes and Noble classic version with the Introduction written by Chris Kraus.

When excerpts from Flaubert's Madame Bovary were published in 1856 France, law enforcement officials were horrified at Flaubert's (relatively non-explicit) fictional memoir of a physician's adulterous wife. They immediately attempted to block full publication of the novel under France's strict obscenity codes, prompting a lawsuit. Flaubert won, the book went to press in 1857, and the literary world has never been the same since.
Do you think that Flaubert's book was somewhat responsible for the writings of such books as Lady Chatterley's Lover and Ulysses?

You should not take everything Flaubert says at face value, especially when he talks about his sexual conquests, he brags incessantly about them and often with very little real life basis. If by 'this class of people' you mean provincial bourgeoisie, indeed, Flaubert was not a big fan of those (although maids are hardly bourgeois). It shouldn't come as a big shock since a lot of writers from his generations sharply criticized the bourgeoisie which is a kind of upper middle class which on the one hand tries to imitate the old nobility (see Emma's fascination for the nobility) while also remaining scrupulously traditionalist when it comes to culture or morals. A lot like the nouveau riches in English and American novels written around the same time, but not wealthy.


When excerpts from Flaubert's Madame Bovary were published in 1856 France, law enforcement officials were horrified at Flaub..."
The book I have at the end has The Trial of "Madame Bovary". I have not had a chance to read it yet but I am guessing its about Flaubert trial.

I have purchased Flaubert's Parrot by Julian Barnes and it looks to be a good read. Great recommendation Bea!
One last thing, I wonder why Flaubert remained living in the province considering he had such a strong dislike for the bourgeois?


Andreea, your statement is much what I have been thinking about this novel..."a kind of upper middle class which on the one hand tries to imitate the old nobility... while also remaining scrupulously traditionalist when it comes to culture or morals." Also I think today you find people in society trying to live with those two things simultaneously. And then Emma didn't truly fit either!
And Seeuuder and Bea, also great points about Flaubert's world outside his doorstep that he observed. He was a writer, maybe intellectually on the edge of society. Could you even say he was a male Jane Austen, restricted by, if not gender, then family responsibility? My edition emphasizes that his household was that of himself, his mother, and his sister's child. It sounds as if they had all been affected by the deaths of the father and the sister and so life went thus. Obviously he was a controversial character, and his life must have garnered more comment than Jane Austen's life, but still, perhaps that was why he lived a provincial life. (Please correct me with more detail, I have read very little about him.)

Rouen where Flaubert lived most of his life wasn't really a tiny isolated village - it was the biggest city in Normandy and a very beautiful place because of its famous Gothic architecture. You probably know the series of paintings Monet made of the Notre Dame Cathedral in Rouen and Stendhal called Rouen the Athens of the Gothic style. Although the city was badly damaged during WWII, even today Rouen has over 200 protected historical monuments. I can see why Flaubert didn't dislike living there.
However, Flaubert did live in Paris a lot, as a matter of fact, he was living in Paris when he finished MB. He first moved to Paris in 1842 and started studying Law, however, two years later he had his first epileptic attack and withdrew from university. He moved close to his family in Rouen because he had almost no independent income until he started making a living as a writer, but also because he needed their help when he was sick. He also travelled a lot outside France.
@ SarahC
I do think Flaubert and Jane Austen have a lot in common and that he was very close to his family, but Flaubert did not set out to be a writer of provincial manners. It's said that the inspiration for MB came after he forced his friends (the writers Louis Bouilhet and Maxime Du Camp) to sit through a very long reading of La Tentation de saint Antoine (which is an epic, fantastic, completely nonsensical allegorical play set in the Egypt of the 4th century AD). They hated La Tentation and told Flaubert to destroy the manuscript and instead go into artistic detox to rid himself of his obsession with the Orient by writing about a down to earth subject, stuff of the kind that happen to ordinary bourgeois. Not only did MB end up being a lot more than a writing exercise, but after he finished it, he started another historical novel set in the East. Salammbo, set in Carthage during the 3rd century BC, was huge bestseller as well as a critical success. Although it's not very well known in the Anglophone world (I'm not sure why, I think maybe because it was too bloody and sensual for most Victorian readers), it's a wonderful novel and much more readable than most of Flaubert's other work.
And again I have rambled on about background.



Simple Heart which can usually be found in Three Stories comes closest to MB, I think. The main character is an uneducated peasant woman who unlike Emma doesn't get married and ends up focusing all her love on the two children she takes care of as a servant. You can almost see her as a character in MB in both Catherine Leroux (the woman who wins the silver metal at the fair) and Felicite (Emma's maid/cook/servant), but at the same time, there's a lot of Emma in her too - it's almost a version of what might have happened to Emma if her father hadn't had the money to send her to the convent and get her educated.
Sentimental Education is a very good book too, although it requires more patience than MB. Stylistically, it's a bit sloppy and at times very boring and painfully slow. It's a very 'male' book too and not simply because most of the characters are men, it's much more bleak, business-like, concerning itself much less with the problems of a unique character (because although Flaubert said that there are hundreds of Madame Bovarys in France, to me at least, the character seems highly individualized) than with the mind-frame of a whole generation. Frederic Moreau feels more like a caricature used to make a political/literary point, Emma Bovary I can see as a fully formed person with an existence of her own.

http://homepage.mac.com/joshtche/Gara...
Although I generally like to let my imagination create my image of characters from the author's descriptions, books with illustrations are so rare today that I do enjoy these occasional glimpses of old books with them.
Books mentioned in this topic
Flaubert's Parrot (other topics)Sentimental Education (other topics)
Lady Chatterley's Lover (other topics)
Salammbô (other topics)
Ulysses (other topics)
More...