SDMB - Straight Dope discussion
Heretical stars: everyone else gave 4-5, you gave 1.
date
newest »


Wuthering Heights -- is it universally adored? I'm not sure. I wanted to read this but the punctuation defeated me. All those unnecessary semicolons and commas -- it was like my first attempt at driving a stick shift. Stop. Start. Shudder. Die.


Also, Lord of the Rings doesn't do anything for me. I attempted the first book a few months before the first movie came out and couldn't get into it. (Didn't like the movie either.)

The one I hate that everyone else seems to like is THE LORD OF THE RINGS.
It's racist (dwarves are like THIS, elves are like THIS, orcs are like THIS, men from the south are like THIS), it's simplistic (and then the good guys ran out from the secret entrance to the tower, slew 80 bad orcs, and then got back into the secret entrance to the tower unscathed. Oh, also Gandalf died, but then he got better), and it's dull (evil. good. what more motive do you WANT, man!?).
The only part I liked was the last 50 pages of The Return of the King, when the hobbits finally had to face a challenge for themselves - good GOD it's about time they grew up - and the people who no longer belonged in a nonmagic middle-Earth had to leave. That was actually touching.
But yeah, I hated LotR.
Oh, and can I get a witness for everything Nathaniel Hawthorne ever wrote? The word is "person," not "personage," unless you're referring to their office, and even then it's pretentious. And "face" is more clear and less jerky than "aspect." And stop referring to yourself while telling a story.

LotR didn't do much for me as a book either, there were large sections that I felt I could just skip and not really feel I'd missed anything.
Anything by John Fowles (he wrote the French Lieutenant's Woman) leaves me cold. My reading club voted for The Magus a while back and I really had a hard time getting past the first chapter!
John Irving has a similar effect on me, sight of his books could send me running for the hills.

I second AuntiePam's mention of Jane Eyre. I read it for class, but it was a struggle. It just seemed to not hold my interest either. I think I ended the book more angry at the characters than anything else.

I was stunned when I finally watched the movie when it arrived on TV - God knows I wasn't going to the trouble to go see it or pay to see it at home - that Tom Hanks would let himself be drawn into acting the part of the idiot lead. predictably he was unbelievable and wooden, but then so was the character he was playing...maybe he did a good job after all.
Red Evans author On Ice
What a horrid book!

I hadn't even thought of the DaVinci Code as something to mention here. It's the type of contemporary writing I generally refuse to read because chances are there's a 19th century German novel or any practitioner of magical realism who did a better job of writing a similar story.
GT


Flowers for Algernon--made me want to kill myself
HP & the Sorceror's Stone--struck me as warmed-over Roald Dahl

Some of the stuff that's mentioned here I don't regard as "universally adored," btw. The DaVinci Code? The Ruins? Bestsellers, sure, but hardly universally adored, by the critics or anyone else. Both those books had large and vocal choruses of detractors.

Books mentioned in this topic
Flowers for Algernon (other topics)The Fellowship of the Ring (other topics)
The Known World
Lord of the Flies
How to Be Good