Terminalcoffee discussion
Pop Culture / Celebrities
>
"Idol" Butchers the Stones' Back Catalog
date
newest »





Sioban's voice would be perfect for theatre, musicals, stage #s, and I love her look (and her name), but her pitch is a bit too whiny for my taste.

I'm still furious that Lilly got voted off. She and Crystal were my front runners. The guys, on the other hand, are all forgettable. Sure, Big Mike has a ton of personality, but at the end of the day, he's a decent singer, but not anyone I'd pay to hear perform.

They did mostly butcher the Stones. I prefer when they pick a theme. I'm usually disappointed when they all do one artist.
King Dinösaur wrote: "Sorry, but the Stones have butchered their own back catalog by not hanging it up thirty years ago."
Yeah, you're right. And if you have any doubts, check out that film Scorcese did a few years back.
Yeah, you're right. And if you have any doubts, check out that film Scorcese did a few years back.

i don't like when they take a group or artist and then have to do their songs anyway. i would rather see them tackle an era or genre. actually, the more i think about it, i couldn't give a flying flapjack about idol anyway
I'll be the first to admit the Stones are a good 25 years past their sell-by date, but whoever came up with the bright idea to have the "Idol" kids tackle the Jagger/Richards songbook should be pilloried in Hyde Park and flogged for 40 days and 40 nights.