Goodreads Librarians Group discussion

35 views
Policies & Practices > Awards with Gold/Silver/Bronze levels

Comments Showing 1-5 of 5 (5 new)    post a comment »
dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Cait (new)

Cait (tigercait) | 5005 comments Did we ever come to a consensus about how to format awards that have gold, silver, and bronze winners? Should they all be listed as winners? Should silver and bronze be nominees? Is there some other way to indicate this that I'm not thinking of?


message 2: by rivka, Librarian Moderator (new)

rivka | 40015 comments Mod
Cait wrote: "Did we ever come to a consensus about how to format awards that have gold, silver, and bronze winners?"

IIRC, we list them as three separate awards. Not elegant, but it works.


message 3: by Cait (new)

Cait (tigercait) | 5005 comments And then a fourth one, to hold the nominees? Or should the nominees attach to the gold?


message 4: by rivka, Librarian Moderator (new)

rivka | 40015 comments Mod
I don't think that was discussed.

I'm torn between those two options, personally.


message 5: by Carolyn (new)

Carolyn (seeford) | 579 comments My two cents: I'd prefer the nominees be a fourth one, just to keep it 'clean'.


back to top