Audiobooks discussion
Archives
>
Audio shelving
date
newest »


I download from Audible.com and I also rip library audiobooks on CD, which I don't note down and track the ISBN for. I also have been trying to use the main hardcover edition of the book as the basis for my listing of the audiobook, and note that it is the audio version in my review.








I only have the ones I've read since I've been on goodreads listed though, just haven't taken the time to put input previous ones.



Yes, when going to the Top Shelves, "audiobook" is not there as there would have to be nearly 6,000 of them to make the list. I am hoping that if everyone creates an "audiobook" (singular) shelf then we could search on that term to find the most popular audiobooks even though it doesn't make the top shelves list (and probably never will). Right now I have to search individually on the myriad of terms I listed in my 8/14 post.
As we appear to be a small but devout group, I'm hoping we can all come together!
--Mike--

Grumpus - you mentioned in the Librarians group that you would consider this if the Audio Books group would go along with it.
I personally support consistency in our terminology for audiobooks.

But Audible books are trickier... should there be a seperate edition for the Audible version? I have been using the CD edition to rate and review my audible books so far.
Grumpus i await your input.


I've also got dramatised versions in my audiobook shelf (e.g. a number of BBC productions of Agatha Christie) - do other people include dramatised versions in the audiobook category? or strictly narrated ones only?

I've been putting number-of-discs for pages as well; the format clearly states "Audio CD", so it's not possible to (reasonably) infer a 10 page book!
I search out the actual information on Audible books, and post them as the underlying CD's. I do have one audiobook that was apparently recorded straight-to-audible, in which I added it w/o an ISBN, with audible as the "publisher", and the number of pages as one (part).
Murph:
I don't listen to dramatised versions, but yes they should certainly be included!

A few days ago I added a suggestion over on the main list to allow librarians to change number of pages to number of discs/cassettes for audiobooks. I, too, have been inserting the number of discs into the page number slot.
I also wouldn't mind having a place to enter the total run time of the audiobook.



As Laura said in Msg 22, we're getting closer to the Top Shelf status I hoped for.
Thanks everyone for your efforts.

I checked the librarians group and couldn't find a discussion on this topic.




I understand what you're saying now (like Kerry, I couldn't quite understand your comment). I've also added a lot of the Bolinda audiobooks manually because most of them aren't sold through Amazon or rather are not in their database (which is where GR retrieves their book info from). oh well, I'm just glad I can actually add them manually, though I agree it's very time-consuming. :)


I listen to mostly CDs so I choose the "Audio CD" edition whenever possible. If there's not an audio option for the book then I log it under the hardcover edition and just add it to my audio shelf.
Books mentioned in this topic
The Shadow Sister (other topics)Beloved Sheikh (other topics)
One Night with the Sheikh (other topics)
The Sheikh's Reward (other topics)
Beloved Sheikh (other topics)
More...
Now back to the shelving issue…under the “explore” tab there is a “top shelves” link showing the most popular shelves. I would like to suggest that anyone listening to an audio book create a shelf entitled, “audiobook”. That will permit others to see how many and which audio books are being listened to in the “explore” tab and secondarily it will serve to standardize this category as I currently see shelves for “audio”, “audiobook”, “audiobooks”, “audible”, “audiblecom”, “listen”, “listened”, and “listenedto” to name a few.
If our group can agree to this standardization, it will make it easier for everyone to find the audiobooks goodreaders are listening to. Does this make sense? Other ideas? Or simply keep the status quo?
--Mike--