The Mary Sue Books and More Club discussion
Our TMS Reads
>
Jan/Feb Book: Cinder, Chapters 35-38
message 1:
by
Hana
(new)
Jan 21, 2015 11:05AM

reply
|
flag
*


I don't usually read sci-fi. Cinder certainly tested my limits. So much tech talk and icky medical stuff! The romantic stuff was pretty typical but I suspect that's the only reason I made it through. The whole time, with the moon people, I was picturing the aliens from the anime Fantastic Children. Which even has the "missing princess raised by humans" similarity.

I think I'm probably too old for it. The romance part was really undeveloped; Kai and Cinder had very similar voices and personalities, and it isn't like they really got to know each other. Maybe I'm a grump but I just didn't see what was special, or cared.
I also thought the world building was very poor. How the legal system around cyborgs worked, why the Lunars are such a threat, why the Earth is so weak and defenseless- it's all skimmed over. We don't even know there's food shortages or an energy crisis until the end at a ball because it's in a speech. Otherwise everyone seems to be living pretty comfortably and in total admiration of a monarchy that is failing them. Cinder's family is supposed to be poor but they have androids and seamstresses, and doesn't seem to starve. It was all tell and little show.
I liked some of the techy stuff, like what Cinder's computer brain and scanners could do. Cyborgs squick me out, but I do enjoy reading about them. The book was also easy to breeze through and held my attention, obviously. I would have enjoyed it in high school, I think, but for me it isn't good as a sci-fi or really as a romance. I don't really care enough to seek out the sequel.

As I was reading, I predicted just about everything in the book, and perhaps that is because I've read so much. I'm wondering if my daughter will catch the foreshadowing.
I did like that the step-mother, while terrible, was not completely one-dimensional.
I agree that the world building was lacking. I was interested in her jailbreak, but then the book ended. I think I am interested enough to pick up the sequels. Maybe some things will be fleshed out more. What does the abbreviation T.E. mean for purposes of time-keeping?
Overall, I thought it was a nice, light enjoyable read.

Our reactions are very similar. I think that this is a premise that had potential but could have been better executed. Holley, I too was reading this thinking, "I'm a little too old to buy this". Sigh. The ravages of age and overly complex fiction books. :-)

I do read a lot of young adult fiction and enjoy it, some of them are among my favorites. This one I liked, rather than loved, which isn't too bad. At least I'm not sobbing over the hours lost reading it. I've read a few books lately that I just loathed.

ETA: This did make me want to read Speak by Laurie Halse Anderson again, so I nominated it for next month's poll. It was my favourite YA but I'm wondering now if I would still enjoy it.

I didn't love the book as a whole but I did like a lot of the concepts and I think I would have adored this book a lot when I was younger. And this is from someone who still reads a couple of YA novels a month and enjoys most of them
I might skim through the sequels because I think they're at my library.


I'd like to see if the rest of the books flesh the world out even more...maybe explain the whole guardianship/Protection Act thing...because I'm still not sure about the owned/adult guardian concept (there seem to be good arguments for both sides).
I think the author could have been able to make the story a bit more entertaining and built up the world and the cyborg concepts a little bit more, but for the middle school/ high school readers it seems to be for, I think it's a good book.
By the way, I wasn't a fan of when she got all googly-eyed over the Prince. As someone else mentioned, she lost her agency and I thought maybe that was a little out of character...but thought it was really awesome to have her come to the ball as a complete mess. Just my two cents :)
EDIT: A co-worker saw me reading the book and asked if he could read it after I was done. I work in a very alpha, "macho" male dominated field, so I was quite surprised when he asked me that. I'm quite interested to hear his thoughts on the book...


Definitely. There are a lot of YA Fantasy books that have just torn me to shreds in the best way possible.

I equated the romance to Anikan and Padme in the second Star Wars prequel. "Well, the narrative says it's time..." but the idea that her glamour might have been kicking could explain it better.




Absolutely. Ever After is my favorite Cinderella movie and I was hoping for something similar. Since it is the first of a series, maybe she will progress a bit more now that she is not focused on dealing with her step-mother.
I would note that minor runaways are committing an offense (where I am it is called "Unruly") and they charged in court with that offense, thought the punishment is not that severe. I think that they whole issue regarding the status of cyborgs, versus Cinder's status as a minor is very muddled.

I completely agree with your assessment. I don't understand how it came so highly recommended by so many people when it was this predictable.

I liked it, it was a quick red, and I am a sucker for alternate takes on fairy tales, but there are too many questions after finishing for me to love it. That said I'll totally read the other books in the series.
OH, and of course I borrowed the second book, Scarlett, as I was getting this one and began readig the blurb which outright stated Cinder would end up imprisoned by the end of it. So I knew, and that's possibly the only plot point I wouldn't have guessed beforehand. Sigh.
But it was fun, and I'd recommend it to people even though I didn't love it.



Then there is media we consume at the end of a long day to unwind, disengage and relax. It does not challenge us, and is only minimally engaging. But it's familiar and interesting enough to keep watching.
Books are like that. This was junk food. Familiar and interesting but nothing that will stay with me long. It was comfortable, predictable and familiar with enough entertainment value to keep reading until the end.
Books serve different and wonderful purposes in our lives... (wow hows that for waxing philosophical early in the am

LOVE Robin McKinley. Bad world-building isn't a marker of YA. I just picked up a China Mieville book I wasn't familiar with (so excited)in the YA section- Railsea- and I can tell you already, before having opened the cover, that the world building will be excellent. Some authors got it, some don't.

There's a couple of reasons why I'd like to continue the series. I've read series that have started shaky and later improved greatly. I love fairy tales and I want to see what the author will do with Red Riding Hood and Rapunzel and maybe others, and I want to see them all interacting. Also it's a light, fun read that I can complete between heavier, harder reads.


Still, I do read comics as a light read, and sometimes it takes me a while to drop a series I'm not enjoying much because I just like squeezing a quick ten minute read in.

I liked it well enough to want to see where it is going. I love fairy tales and re-tellings. I'm not so into cyborgs, but the book sold the premise well enough that I am curious to see where this goes.
It is a decent light read and enjoyable enough to keep me coming back. Cinderella is not my favorite fairy tale anyway so I want to see who else is brought in and what the author does with them.

This also bothered me! I felt the same, where it was an interesting choice, but for some reason I couldn't get used to it.
I don't know that I will continue with this series any time soon, but I might pick up the rest somewhere down the line. I enjoyed reading it, but found myself wanting to read it faster just because I was more interested in reading these discussion posts.





It was a very fast read, and since I picked it up over the weekend, I did move on to the sequels. Not one of my favorites, but not nearly as bad as others I've read.

Also, am I the only one who didn't really understand what was so bad about being a cyborg? If it is how people are saved from accidents I am not sure why it would become such a crazy taboo.

I agree. As another Old, I think I actually handle YA fiction better now than when I was a teenager. Back then, I kept trying to prove to everyone that I was too smart for YA fiction. (Yes, I was the girl reading Sylvia Plath, Anne Rice, and Arthur Rimbaud in the corner. How did you guess?)
I really would like it addressed how being a cyborg would automatically make someone a second-class citizen. If it makes people eligible for a death draft and they basically become property of their family, then wouldn't most people prefer to die after an accident? You would have to really trust your relatives to give them that level of power over you.
My main issue was that it wasn't clear how much of Cinder's issues were from her being a cyborg as opposed to being a minor. Clearly, there are larger political issues stemming from being a cyborg, but I'm wondering how much of her step-mother's control over her had to do with her being underage.
Also, why so hard on cyborgs? By their rules, Luke Skywalker is a cyborg, and that's just silly.

I'm giving the writer the benefit of knowing it was her first novel like this & while I enjoyed her writing very much & the q&a at the end, she has progressed a lot through the next 2. I can't wait to start Fairest!


What bugged me the most, though, were the author's attempts at foreshadowing, which to me crossed the line pretty quickly to fore-bludgeoning. A little more subtlety and trust in the reader would have been nice.
I definitely won't be picking up the sequels. I hope we select a better book next time!

That damn pumpkin car.

For me with this one, it was to feel smart when that thing I figured out in the first 50 pages wound up being true...because I am a brat who likes to be right, haha.

Anyway, I just wanted to give you a bit of a hat-tip. Cheers.

Also, definitely using "fore-bludgeoning" in the future.
And Lisa, I agree! I mentioned it to the other mods too, so far the group has been great and I am so glad we can disagree civilly.

