Dragons & Jetpacks discussion

This topic is about
Middlegame
BotM Discussion - FANTASY
>
Middlegame / Overall Discussion / **Spoilers**
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Melanie
(new)
-
rated it 3 stars
Aug 17, 2020 06:41AM

reply
|
flag

What are your thoughts:
believably?
plot arc?
characters?

For me this one was totally out there and totally acceptable for all that.
I DNF'd early on. The beginning jumped around so much, it was annoying, and there wasn't a single character I cared about.
I enjoyed this book, but wasn't a huge fan of the way the author teased you with knowledge you knew you would get later. I always see things like that as a way to artificially drive up the tension and the mystery in a book. It did make a lot more sense in this book because of the time manipulation aspect that the story is based around.
Also, not many books in the fantasy/sci-fi genre that have a main character with the same name as me, I've been called Dodger a handful of times as well, so that was fun.
Also, not many books in the fantasy/sci-fi genre that have a main character with the same name as me, I've been called Dodger a handful of times as well, so that was fun.

I loved the idea of the time resets too and the idea that they had to actually reset the whole universe not just their little bit. Thinking how many times they might have had to reset everything made my mind boggle a bit.
I did feel like the ending was a bit rushed though with the defeat of Reed seeming to happen out of nowhere. I couldn't help thinking also that if he's in a big mad scientist base then surely he'd have other guards and staff members around and yet Roger and Dodger were able to just walk in.
It felt like the author was gloating about withholding knowledge. "I bet you're so confused now, you poor idiot! Ha ha!" Patience ran out.
Audrey wrote: "It felt like the author was gloating about withholding knowledge. "I bet you're so confused now, you poor idiot! Ha ha!" Patience ran out."
That's a very good description, that's what I was feeling to but you put it in much simpler terms than I did.
That's a very good description, that's what I was feeling to but you put it in much simpler terms than I did.
Or when an author kills off all the characters at the end just to make you sad, no other reason. That kind of manipulation is insulting to me.



I just found the whole thing overly cryptic and felt the author tried to make things confusing just for the sake of it.
I think I would have liked it better if they had described a bit more about what the actual point of the impossible city and the improbable road was. I get that they were trying to gain control of the world through it but there was no real explanation to why, only another story that everything seemed to based on. Does anyone know if that was a real book or not btw? I haven't looked it up and i'm not sure I want to give any more of my life to it. :)
I didnt mind the time jumps so much as other people seem to have, but then I stopped really caring about what time they were in and found that made the book a little better.
The character were all very unlikable for me. There wasn't a single character other than the cat that I was at all bothered about.
Sorry this one was a bit of downer for me.
I'm glad about my decision, then. I kind of wanted the energy cell but couldn't bring myself to do it.

I just found the whole thing overly cryptic and felt the auth..."
LOL - i liked the cat too.


In the end, the way it all connected, I thought it make sense enough to appreciate. The confusion, for me, was intentional enough without it being too distracting. I enjoyed the folklore / fairytale style of writing (I really enjoyed the imagery of the Over the Woodward Wall snippets). Even though I had to suspend my belief, it wasn't off-putting. I thought the characterization was well done for the twins, although Reed and Leigh were borderline too villainous for believability. I cared enough that I didn't want Dodger or Roger to die, so I guess that counts for something. The best one was Old Bill (the cat) for sure!