The Catholic Book Club discussion

This topic is about
On the God of the Christians
On the God of the Christians
>
Along the Way
date
newest »

message 1:
by
John
(new)
Aug 02, 2018 05:57PM

reply
|
flag


I'm tantalized by his statement in the foreword, "God alone has the right to be an atheist." I suppose he means that no one less than God can be sure "There is no God," only "I don't believe in/think there is a God."
His comparison/contrast of Judaism, Christianity and Islam is also fascinating, beginning with the fact that they were first lumped together by those wishing to discredit all three.

I'm tantalized by his s..."
For me it is one of the best part of the book. And they are three diferent religions with a different idea of God.
As I finished with the biography of St. Catherine around mid-July, I decided to start with Brague's book immediately and finished it before the end of the month. Then I have started reading it all over again since August 1st, as I consider the book deserving of two readings. I am now again in chapter 3.

Unfortunatelly i have the impression that i will not be able to read again. I have to read a lot of books this summer :-(.
As you have all said, it is not an easy read, but worth it and worth a second read. I was originally planning to read a chapter a day and then turn to other books for the rest of each day and the rest of the month, but I just finished Chapter Two last night. I didn't really get started until the 3rd, so I think I will still finish in a week or so, which leaves plenty of time this month for a second read. Assuming work cooperates.

Well i suppose that i am not very original but i totally agree with you. It is a book dificult to read it, but i have the impression that a second reading it was very profitable.
I apologize for my lack of participation. My time these past few weeks has been consumed in reading, writing and thinking about the current crisis in the Church.
I have been reading this month's book, although even more slowly than before. I will try to increase my participation.
I have been reading this month's book, although even more slowly than before. I will try to increase my participation.

And I am still reading Catherine of Siena! Not sure why I am struggling with it.
Bice wrote: "Oh John this newest crisis is hitting me hard. Where can we see what you are writing about this?
And I am still reading Catherine of Siena! Not sure why I am struggling with it."
I think it is hitting everyone hard because it is, essentially, the same scandal. They put some window treatments up and a coat of paint, but they ignored the rot and the overflowing filth in the basement.
I belong to Ricochet, which gives me a platform to write on. As a member my writing is behind the paywall where it is only visible to other members, unless it is selected for promotion to the Main Feed. I had an article on this promoted last week. It can be read here: https://ricochet.com/541381/i-will-not/
And I am still reading Catherine of Siena! Not sure why I am struggling with it."
I think it is hitting everyone hard because it is, essentially, the same scandal. They put some window treatments up and a coat of paint, but they ignored the rot and the overflowing filth in the basement.
I belong to Ricochet, which gives me a platform to write on. As a member my writing is behind the paywall where it is only visible to other members, unless it is selected for promotion to the Main Feed. I had an article on this promoted last week. It can be read here: https://ricochet.com/541381/i-will-not/

John, I was not aware of what you call "the current crisis in the Church," meaning the case against ex-cardinal McCarrick. I have read your article and the information in the Wikipedia about the case, and have a couple of questions.
Apparently there are sinners even in high places in the Church. Is that news?
Apparently, for some time there has been a tendency, in high places in the Church, to hide these cases, for different reasons. This was a mistake. But this policy has been actively rejected during the last 15 years at the least. Unavoidably, many of the previous cases are being exposed now. Are we going to rent our clothes whenever an old case surfaces?
You allow that you still don't know what to do. But the last two Popes at the least have worked against this atrocity, when it started leaking out. There are new rules and stricter actions. Shouldn't you give them some time to put them in effect and everybody, even priests, to think it over, as you yourself are doing?
Do you really think that, whatever we do, we will be able to eradicate sin completely, not from the Church, but from the people who are the Church?
Finally, I would suggest you read the last chapter in our current book of the month. Perhaps it may have something to tell you about this case.
Apparently there are sinners even in high places in the Church. Is that news?
Apparently, for some time there has been a tendency, in high places in the Church, to hide these cases, for different reasons. This was a mistake. But this policy has been actively rejected during the last 15 years at the least. Unavoidably, many of the previous cases are being exposed now. Are we going to rent our clothes whenever an old case surfaces?
You allow that you still don't know what to do. But the last two Popes at the least have worked against this atrocity, when it started leaking out. There are new rules and stricter actions. Shouldn't you give them some time to put them in effect and everybody, even priests, to think it over, as you yourself are doing?
Do you really think that, whatever we do, we will be able to eradicate sin completely, not from the Church, but from the people who are the Church?
Finally, I would suggest you read the last chapter in our current book of the month. Perhaps it may have something to tell you about this case.

Praying and fasting.......
Bice wrote: "how do we acquire the courage to do the hard work of finally “fixing” this so 5 years from now someone else will not be in the news"
But Bice, the cases surfacing now date from twenty, forty and even fifty years ago. How can you fix it so that 5 years from now no more cases will come up?
I think you are overreacting precisely when the Church is taking these cases seriously. Notice that in the McCarrick case the question has not been addressed by the Press or in secular courts, but by the Church itself.
But Bice, the cases surfacing now date from twenty, forty and even fifty years ago. How can you fix it so that 5 years from now no more cases will come up?
I think you are overreacting precisely when the Church is taking these cases seriously. Notice that in the McCarrick case the question has not been addressed by the Press or in secular courts, but by the Church itself.
Mariangel wrote: "I found this article worth reading:
http://thesestonewalls.com/gordon-mac..."
This is a very interesting article, specially coming from Fr. Gordon Macrae, who is probably the victim of a flawed case of justice in this area.
The following address gives a summary of the case and provides many additional links:
https://www.catholicjournal.us/2016/0...
http://thesestonewalls.com/gordon-mac..."
This is a very interesting article, specially coming from Fr. Gordon Macrae, who is probably the victim of a flawed case of justice in this area.
The following address gives a summary of the case and provides many additional links:
https://www.catholicjournal.us/2016/0...

I have been reading this month's b..."
Do not worry John the first the job after the pleasure.
Manuel wrote: "John, I was not aware of what you call "the current crisis in the Church," meaning the case against ex-cardinal McCarrick. I have read your article and the information in the Wikipedia about the ca..."
My apologies, I don't want to hijack the book discussion with this issue. I appreciate your thoughts, but will respond in the Atrium, where I should have posted my original comment.
My apologies, I don't want to hijack the book discussion with this issue. I appreciate your thoughts, but will respond in the Atrium, where I should have posted my original comment.
