Political Philosophy and Ethics discussion
Political Philosophy and Law
>
Representatve Politics
date
newest »


Hami wrote (post 1): "Does anyone know a good source to read a critic of contemporary representational politics from the perspective of oppressed or unrepresented?
-What comes to my mind is Pedagogy of the Oppressed b..."
As founding moderator, I have moved your new topic to the "Political Philosophy" folder and renamed it "Representative Politics." If "Representational Politics" means something different to you from "Representative Politics," please let me know.
Please review the rules on the home page of this group as well as in the "Rules and Housekeeping" topic that is hyperlinked on the home page. Note that the rules require posters to consult with me before creating new substantive topics. This is an example of why that rule exists, as you initially placed the topic in the wrong folder and apparently misnamed it. That said, I am permitting the renamed topic in the appropriate folder because I can see that it may be an appropriate separate topic.
Alan E. Johnson
Founding Moderator
-What comes to my mind is Pedagogy of the Oppressed b..."
As founding moderator, I have moved your new topic to the "Political Philosophy" folder and renamed it "Representative Politics." If "Representational Politics" means something different to you from "Representative Politics," please let me know.
Please review the rules on the home page of this group as well as in the "Rules and Housekeeping" topic that is hyperlinked on the home page. Note that the rules require posters to consult with me before creating new substantive topics. This is an example of why that rule exists, as you initially placed the topic in the wrong folder and apparently misnamed it. That said, I am permitting the renamed topic in the appropriate folder because I can see that it may be an appropriate separate topic.
Alan E. Johnson
Founding Moderator

Thank you Michael for the response and the great background.
Do you have any suggestions to read on this topic that can also take into account the current situation of representative politics, Trump, raise of alt-right, racism and other similar phenomena in relation to the marginalization of people from the public sphere and political life, or extreme polarization of politics?
Hami wrote: "Thank you Alan for sorting the post.
Thank you Michael for the response and the great background.
Do you have any suggestions to read on this topic that can also take into account the current sit..."
This is a vast topic. I am more knowledgeable about the situation in the United States than elsewhere. The problem in the United States, in my view, is that various institutions have thwarted the will of the majority of the people. First and foremost is the US Electoral College. Significantly, Trump won the presidency as a result of obtaining a majority of the votes in the Electoral College. His opponent, Hillary Clinton, beat him in the popular vote by almost three million votes. How could this happen? In my recently published book The Electoral College: Failures of Original Intent and a Proposed Constitutional Amendment for Direct Popular Vote, I discuss this question in depth. I start with the conception of the US founders of the Electoral College as formulated in the 1787 Constitutional Convention. I then proceed with the history of the Electoral College, culminating in the election of 2016. I conclude with a proposed constitutional amendment for direct popular vote with a provision for instant-runoff (ranked choice) voting in the event no presidential candidate receives a majority of the popular votes cast.
There are other impediments to the electoral success of majorities in federal and state elections. Many states have onerous election laws and practices that impact minorities and poor people more than the middle class. Gerrymandering is quite prevalent. These and other such issues are discussed, with hyperlinks to sources available on the internet, in our topic Electoral College (USA) and Other Issues Regarding Electoral Procedures.
Thank you Michael for the response and the great background.
Do you have any suggestions to read on this topic that can also take into account the current sit..."
This is a vast topic. I am more knowledgeable about the situation in the United States than elsewhere. The problem in the United States, in my view, is that various institutions have thwarted the will of the majority of the people. First and foremost is the US Electoral College. Significantly, Trump won the presidency as a result of obtaining a majority of the votes in the Electoral College. His opponent, Hillary Clinton, beat him in the popular vote by almost three million votes. How could this happen? In my recently published book The Electoral College: Failures of Original Intent and a Proposed Constitutional Amendment for Direct Popular Vote, I discuss this question in depth. I start with the conception of the US founders of the Electoral College as formulated in the 1787 Constitutional Convention. I then proceed with the history of the Electoral College, culminating in the election of 2016. I conclude with a proposed constitutional amendment for direct popular vote with a provision for instant-runoff (ranked choice) voting in the event no presidential candidate receives a majority of the popular votes cast.
There are other impediments to the electoral success of majorities in federal and state elections. Many states have onerous election laws and practices that impact minorities and poor people more than the middle class. Gerrymandering is quite prevalent. These and other such issues are discussed, with hyperlinks to sources available on the internet, in our topic Electoral College (USA) and Other Issues Regarding Electoral Procedures.
-What comes to my mind is Pedagogy of the Oppressed by Paulo Freire, or Fred Moten and Stefano Harney's The undercommons. The main reason I got interested in the topic is that I have been discussing the effects of Imperialism with a friend and we came to disagree about the functionality of representational politics in different cultures and geographies. I have also recently read an interesting article/essay by Arash Abizadeh, called "Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders" which was related to international politics, law and foreign policy in relation to human rights.
What I am not interested is a kind of critic of representational politics that is seeking to go beyond politics as a whole, or moving toward direct democracy or direct action without taking into account the vulnerability of minority communities, the underclass, voiceless and the oppressed.