Play Book Tag discussion

42 views
2016-19 Activities & Challenges > Buddy Read: Red Clocks by Leni Zumas *SPOILERS ALLOWED*

Comments Showing 1-50 of 153 (153 new)    post a comment »
« previous 1 3 4

message 1: by Nicole R (last edited Jul 11, 2018 08:17AM) (new)

Nicole R (drnicoler) | 7915 comments Welcome to anyone who is interested in reading Red Clocks for the July Decathlon Challenge and/or the July dystopia tag!

The people I have so far are:
Nicole R (me!)
Susie
Nicole D
Rachel N
KateNZ
Jen
Chili
sushicat
Anita
Joi
Olivermangus
Jason (maybe?)
Kelly

If other people chime in, then I can add you to this list so that it makes for easy reporting for the Decathlon Challenge.

Looking forward to diving in!


message 2: by KateNZ (new)

KateNZ | 2821 comments Me :)


message 3: by Nicole R (new)

Nicole R (drnicoler) | 7915 comments Yay! Kate, I’ll get you added to the list above when I am at an actual computer later today!


message 4: by Jen (new)

Jen | 1545 comments I’ll join


message 5: by Nicole R (new)

Nicole R (drnicoler) | 7915 comments Great!


message 6: by Chili (new)

Chili Hanson (chilipinkcat) | 128 comments May I join in please.


message 7: by Nicole R (new)

Nicole R (drnicoler) | 7915 comments Chili wrote: "May I join in please."

Absolutely!


message 8: by Sushicat (new)

Sushicat | 805 comments Me too!


message 9: by Nicole R (new)

Nicole R (drnicoler) | 7915 comments Sushicat wrote: "Me too!"

Got you added!


message 10: by Nicole D. (new)

Nicole D. | 1527 comments and Anita


message 11: by Nicole R (new)

Nicole R (drnicoler) | 7915 comments Nicole D. wrote: "and Anita"

Gracias. Have her added.


message 12: by Joi (new)

Joi (missjoious) | 3880 comments Add me, please :)


message 13: by Nicole R (new)

Nicole R (drnicoler) | 7915 comments Joi wrote: "Add me, please :)"

You got it!


message 14: by Susie (new)

Susie Anyone else going to do the audio? I’m hoping it will lend itself to that format. I’m tempted to start today but I shall refrain!


message 15: by Susie (new)

Susie Emily May didn’t like it, which means I’m going to love it!


message 16: by Joi (new)

Joi (missjoious) | 3880 comments Susie wrote: "Emily May didn’t like it, which means I’m going to love it!"

Lol!!! Looks like the star ratings on this are pretty polarized. Some who LOVE it, some who strongly dislike. I often disagree with Emily May also. I try my darndest to not let reviews sway my perceptions and views.


message 17: by Nicole R (last edited Jun 28, 2018 05:52PM) (new)

Nicole R (drnicoler) | 7915 comments Susie wrote: "Anyone else going to do the audio? I’m hoping it will lend itself to that format. I’m tempted to start today but I shall refrain!"

I am going to listen to it! I probably won't start it for a couple of weeks though.


message 18: by Nicole D. (new)

Nicole D. | 1527 comments Susie I started it on audio and decided immediately I wanted to read it, because it started so cleverly, so take that with a grain of salt. If anybody wants/needs Kindle version, message me.


message 19: by Sushicat (new)

Sushicat | 805 comments Nicole R wrote: "Susie wrote: "Anyone else going to do the audio? I’m hoping it will lend itself to that format. I’m tempted to start today but I shall refrain!"

I am going to listen to it! I probably won't start ..."


Looking at the first few chapters I don’t see how this one would work well in audio.


message 20: by Nicole R (new)

Nicole R (drnicoler) | 7915 comments Well, it is audio or nothing for me these days because of all of my reading for law school, so I will make it work!


message 21: by Susie (new)

Susie I’ve started the audio and I’m ok with it. Fingers crossed.


message 22: by Sushicat (new)

Sushicat | 805 comments I hope it works out well.


message 23: by Nicole R (new)

Nicole R (drnicoler) | 7915 comments Sushicat wrote: "I hope it works out well."

Me too! lol


message 24: by Jason (new)

Jason Oliver | 2112 comments I may read this if I get to it.


message 25: by Olivermagnus (new)

 Olivermagnus (lynda214) | 2572 comments P!ease add me. I just picked up th book today.


message 26: by Nicole R (new)

Nicole R (drnicoler) | 7915 comments Olivermagnus wrote: "P!ease add me. I just picked up th book today."

Got it!


message 27: by Anita (new)

Anita Pomerantz | 7274 comments Nicole D. wrote: "Susie I started it on audio and decided immediately I wanted to read it, because it started so cleverly, so take that with a grain of salt. If anybody wants/needs Kindle version, message me."

I started in it book form and while I'm not an audio person so probably not qualified to say, I would read this one personally. It uses very few names, and I think that lends itself a lot better to reading. It's definitely not a traditional linear writing style either.

All that said, so far I am wowed (only 10% of the way in).


message 28: by Susie (new)

Susie I’m feeling wowed too. Fingers crossed for an amazing read.


message 29: by Nicole R (new)

Nicole R (drnicoler) | 7915 comments I thought about starting it, but, honestly, I need to prep a bit more for the topic of illegal abortions since Justice Kennedy announced his retirement and we now know there will be a full-fledged attack on Roe v. Wade. Not to delve into politics on our very neutral site...

So, I am squeezing in a quick chick lit before I move on to Red Clocks.

Susie, how are you finding the audio?


message 30: by Susie (new)

Susie I’m really liking it! Unfortunately the school holidays are upon my so my audio time will be drastically reduced for the next two weeks.


message 31: by Jen (new)

Jen | 1545 comments I will be starting it tonight@


message 32: by Joi (new)

Joi (missjoious) | 3880 comments Nicole R wrote: "I need to prep a bit more for the topic of illegal abortions since Justice Kennedy announced his retirement and we now know there will be a full-fledged attack on Roe v. Wade. "

This subject is totally and completely terrifying. That is all I'm going to say.

I started the regular version (not audio) last night. Only made it about 20 pages before falling asleep, but it so far is very easy to read. Looking forward to getting into it!


message 33: by Susie (new)

Susie I had to look up Roe vs Wade and Justice Kennedy. Wow. The Handmaid’s Tale gets closer every day.


message 34: by Susie (new)

Susie I’ve switched to reading instead of listening. I’m busting to keep reading and I’ll get hardly any audio time in the next few weeks. Pesky kids and pesky school holidays!


message 35: by Rachel N. (new)

Rachel N. | 1691 comments Susie wrote: "I had to look up Roe vs Wade and Justice Kennedy. Wow. The Handmaid’s Tale gets closer every day."

I like getting the perspective of someone in another country on this. I think most people in the U.S. know what Roe v. Wade is about and I forget it isn't common knowledge elsewhere.

I started the book last night and made it about 40 pages in.


message 36: by Nicole R (new)

Nicole R (drnicoler) | 7915 comments I agree, Rachel! It is such a US-centric concern/information.

Without getting into a political discussion, but really more just about the facts.....

I am actually very interested now, Susie, what is the legal status of abortions in Australia? Do we have members from other countries? If so, what is the legal status of abortions in your country?

In the US, the US Supreme Court has held that a woman has a right to choose an abortion because it falls under the umbrella of the Right to Privacy (which is a really amorphous umbrella that a lot of personal choice issues fall under). Roe v. Wade is the court case that established that back in 1973.

However, other court cases have held that the government can place reasonable restrictions on that right (that is a Supreme Court case called Casey v. Planned Parenthood from 1992). In general, the woman has the right to an abortion up until the "point of viability" (which happens to be more and more contentious as science advances, but in general this typically is the end of the first trimester) and the government has the right to restrict or prohibit abortions after that point, but there must always be an exception for emergencies and for the health of the mother. Stenberg v. Carhart in 2000 established the health exception part.

Another area with a lot of legal action is the de facto prohibition of abortions by regulating the clinics/doctors/procedures to the point that it restricts access to the point of it being unreasonable. An example of this was in Texas, where a state law mandated extra standards at abortion clinics beyond what is medically necessary that would have resulted in only 9 clinics being open in the whole state (Texas is big, for our out-of-USers). That is Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt in 2016, but there have been many other cases that deal with other aspects of access.

Justice Kennedy has been an unexpected vote to protect the right to choose since being nominated to the court by a Republican president (for our non-USers, a very general statement is that R politicians tend to oppose access to abortions while D politicians tend to support it). As many of you know, President Trump is a republican and has been very vocal about nominating a candidate who will overturn Roe v. Wade, thereby making abortions illegal in this country again.

Just a little overview for our nonUS friends as you dive into this book. And an explanation of why this seemingly dystopian novel is very timely—and hard to read for some of us who support the right to choose.


message 37: by Joi (last edited Jul 03, 2018 10:12AM) (new)

Joi (missjoious) | 3880 comments Great summary. Nicole. Full of facts, quick, concise, and yet shows the importance and frankly-the severity of the situation, and how it relates to Red Clocks.

Just to chime another recent incident that has gotten quite a bit of international coverage, recently an Arizona pharmacist was LEGALLY ABLE to deny a patient their doctor-prescribed miscarriage-inducing medication after her fetus had stopped developing. This was because the pharmacist had a "moral objection" to this perspiration. She has spoken out at the loss of control over her body this situation has given her, the emotional roller coaster, and the EXTREMELY poorly way the company and it's employee handled it.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/...

This brings so many questions to light. Primarily- whose right it is it to deny/approve what anyone does with their bodies? Where is the line of privacy drawn?


message 38: by Susie (new)

Susie Thanks for the overview. The fact that it is possible that abortion could again be made illegal makes my head spin.

Here in Australia abortion is legal in all states, although some states still have restrictions. The restrictions are not too severe and exemptions are granted in most cases, eg rape, foetal defects, mental health, economic factors etc.

Certain Liberal Party leaders (the Liberal Party are our conservative political party - confusing) and independents have attempted to introduce more harsh restrictions, and did stall the sale of RU-486 until 2006. Thank the stars that the majority of the senate have their heads screwed on correctly and a motion that was moved last year to ban late term abortions was overwhelmingly voted down.

In Victoria, my home state, it has recently been made illegal to stage protests or harass people within 150m of abortion clinics. I have through my career as a social worker on occasion taken clients to clinics, and to have jars containing fake babies shoved in your face when you are going through the abortion process is just abysmal. I was very happy with this ruling.


message 39: by Nicole R (new)

Nicole R (drnicoler) | 7915 comments Susie, thank you for the overview! Very interesting to learn more about what other countries allow and restrict. Is the drug you mentioned (I am on my phone so can’t refer back to the number you stated) a type of “morning after” pill? I think there is another name for them as well, but that is a common term over here.

We also have the minimum distance requirement, though I cannot think what it is off the top of my head, but probably close to yours.

I can only imagine how difficult it was to escort those women to the clinics, even without people outside harassing them.


message 40: by Susie (new)

Susie RU-486 is the so called abortion pill, so it’s one step further than the morning after pill and can induce a miscarriage within the first 50 days. A brief Google leads me to believe that it is available in the US? Its introduction was very controversial here.


message 41: by Nicole R (new)

Nicole R (drnicoler) | 7915 comments I do know there are stronger options available with a prescription, things along the lines of what Joi described above. I am not very fluent in those though, I should probably do some research!

They are controversial here are well. Everything that touches the topic of women’s health tends to be controversial!


message 42: by Susie (new)

Susie Oh yes, I just read the article and it is RU-486. How horrendous for the woman! To be going through the loss of her pregnancy and then have to face that. Ugh.


message 43: by Tracy (last edited Jul 04, 2018 07:17AM) (new)

Tracy (tstan) | 1245 comments Joi wrote: "Great summary. Nicole. Full of facts, quick, concise, and yet shows the importance and frankly-the severity of the situation, and how it relates to Red Clocks.

Just to chime anoth..."


As a pharmacist, let me explain the laws, at least in the states I’m licensed in. These tend to be the same or similar in all states.

In short, a pharmacist has the right to refuse to dispense a prescription he is morally opposed to. HOWEVER, the pharmacist is required to find another pharmacist, either a coworker or another pharmacy, that will fill the prescription. What this pharmacist did was reprehensible, and illegal.

As a company, Walgreens tends to have a hard time retaining pharmacists, thereby getting a larger proportion of new grads and those who have trouble with rules. I would guess that this pharmacist’s religious beliefs had nothing to do with his actions. He’s just a jerk.

On top of that, Plan B (aka RU 486) is over the counter. So he really had no reason to be such a tool.


message 44: by Olivermagnus (new)

 Olivermagnus (lynda214) | 2572 comments I'm only about 25 percent through the book and am finding it a bit of a struggle so far. THe only character I find very interesting is the Biographer but I feel like the Mender has some potential.


message 45: by Olivermagnus (new)

 Olivermagnus (lynda214) | 2572 comments I'm halfway through the book now and feel like it has really picked up. I'm not as confused about the four major characters and how they relate.

From a personal standpoint I have so much sympathy for the Biographer. My sister struggled through three rounds of invitro fertilization, finally resulting in an unsuccessful ectoptic pregnancy. Then three horrible and unsuccessful adoption incidents, one where the mother changed her mind after my sister had received the baby. I know how sad it is to want a baby so badly and see how the timing makes the Biographer's quest even more important.


message 46: by Jen (last edited Jul 04, 2018 02:12PM) (new)

Jen | 1545 comments I grew up in Costa Rica where abortion is essentially illegal except in cases of the mother's health. Costa Rica is a Catholic country and unfortunately religious beliefs guide politics and law. There is no exception to the law for rape victims or women carrying deformed/unviable fetuses.

Recent legal challenges have been made to the law. Recently a very public case involving a 12 year-old who was repeatedly raped by her father was all over the news. Her mother and family wanted to terminate the pregnancy. The child was suicidal and yet being forced to give birth to her father's child. Other high profile cases have centered around women who have been forced to carry fetuses with severe defects who sued the government for extreme emotional distress. I'm not sure what the outcome was for those cases.

Costa Rica also bans IVF. So we're pretty much like this book.

I think it's all disgraceful. On a personal note, before I had my daughter I had a previous pregnancy. I had some difficulties with my pregnancy and so was being monitored a lot early on. At the 12 week check up the ultrasound showed no heartbeat. I had the choice to get the D&C procedure or simply wait and see if my body did the job for me. I got the D&C done because I couldn't fathom the idea of carrying around a dead fetus around for what could have been weeks. It was very upsetting. If I had been in Costa Rica, I would not have been allowed to get the D&C.


message 47: by Nicole R (new)

Nicole R (drnicoler) | 7915 comments Jen wrote: "On a personal note, before I had my daughter I had a previous pregnancy...."

I am so sorry to hear that, Jen. That is a heartbreaking situation to be in and then if you would have been someplace without the option of a D&C it would have just added even more distress and anxiety to a situation that already had more than enough of both.


message 48: by Susie (new)

Susie Jen, sorry to hear that you went through that experience. I am so glad for you that the D&C was an option. Imagine having to just wait it out. I wonder how frequently people choose that as an option.

Oliver, how awful for your sister. How long had she had the baby for when the birth mother changed her mind? That must have been very traumatic for her.


message 49: by Kelly (new)

Kelly | 870 comments I will join the group.


message 50: by Nicole R (new)

Nicole R (drnicoler) | 7915 comments Great, Kelly! I will get you added to the list above.


« previous 1 3 4
back to top