21st Century Literature discussion

This topic is about
The Heart's Invisible Furies
2018 Book Discussions
>
Hearts Invisible Furies - Whole Book - spoilers allowed! (Apr 2018)
date
newest »


I loved the "every 7 years" aspect to the story. And while I don't mind flash-backs or books written with simultaneous timelines, it was wonderfully refreshing to read a book with a single narrator telling the story from beginning to end. And starting the narrator's voice before he was even born was an interesting choice.
The big theme for me was the Catholic church and society vs "others". With "others" being defined as unwed mothers (or women in general) and homosexual individuals. The other big theme for me was that love and humanity and hope prevail in the end.
I was amazed to learn that homosexuality was only "decriminalized" in Ireland in 1993. I looked up the topic on Wikipedia if anyone is interested: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_ri...
I guess I "knew" in the back of my mind that homosexuality was against the law in the past, but I honestly never really thought that had been true within my lifetime - at least not in the West.
I also never considered what it would be like to live in a society where your core sense of who you are would be illegal. There are still places in the world where it's still considered OK to beat up, murder, imprison or execute someone due to their sexual preferences. Amazing and sad.
I loved how there were no loose threads in the book. This is clearly not how *real* life works, but it can be very satisfying in fiction. Cyril and his birth mother find each other (finally) - I had been starting to think that the pre-birth narration was just going to be left hanging out there unexplained. I really appreciated the Cathrine Goggins/Jack Smoot story line, and how much it intersected with the Cyril/Bastiaan/Ignac story line.
And with Cyril, Julian, Alice, Charles and the eventual children and grandchildren, we're reminded that family and friendship can endure some really awful behavior. Again in *real* life, relationships don't usually survive some of the things these characters did - but I liked the love and hope theme as a counterpoint to the hate and hopelessness of church and society as represented in the story.
The book had a few cultural references that seemed to not be all that central to the story - the Holocaust, the AIDS epidemic, 9/11 - but it did ground the story in a particular place and time.
I'm looking forward to hearing what others think of the book.
(As one last note, I had the privilege to visit the Anne Frank House in Amsterdam and highly recommend it to anyone who finds themselves in that great city.)

I loved the "every 7 years" aspect to the story. And while I don't mind flash-backs or books written with ..."
Thanks for your thoughts Sue, and so glad you enjoyed the book too!
One of the interesting things about the whole homosexuality angle is that even though Ireland had a long history of discrimination and laws against such, largely due to the Catholic influence, it was actually the first Western nation to legalize same-sex marriage - which Boyne pointed to as one of the impetuses for him to write the book.

I loved the "every 7 years" aspect to the story. And while I don't mind flash-backs or books written with ..."
Re Anne Frank House - yes! in fact I read the book shortly after I visited it - I like it when those coincidences crop up.

"Yes, well he [Freud] also said that the Irish were the one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever."
"...she [Maude] extinguished her cigarette in the center of an egg yolk..."
"They don't put women on that [tea towels]. Only men. Although they do let us use it to dry the dishes." (I have my doubts Brenda ever allowed Maude to dry dishes, or that Maude would have tried.)
"A moment later, a cloud of smoke entered the the room followed, inevitably, by Maude." Portrait of a character -- and a time.
Or there is the opening line, to set the tone: "Long before we discovered ...."


In places this is a very, very funny book – the parts set in Ireland especially so – but this makes Boyne’s handling of the serious matter of prejudice and corruption tricky. Ultimately, I felt that the exaggerated depiction of the characters prevented me from engaging with them deeply and Cyril’s relentless self-obsession (though completely understandable) is also challenging. It makes many of the relationships unconvincing – how can Cyril and Julian be ‘best friends’ when Julian only enlists Cyril for a couple of illicit schoolboy adventures, and is abroad and out of communication for most of their adult lives?
The opening section of the book is vivid and affecting (and rage-inducing), and sets the scene for a larger engagement with marginalisation, linking female and homosexual experience. However, except for the wonderful Catherine Goggin (how I would love to meet her!), women are often trapped in stereotype – Cyril (in a weird burst of prurience) depicts Ignac’s girlfriend Emily, with her troublesomely visible breasts, as virtually a sexual predator, while Alice’s only reference point is an eternal obsession with her runaway bridegroom, even half a century later… The best thing about the novel is its absolute refusal to sentimentalise Ireland. Three cheers for that!

I also agree about not sentimentalizing Ireland - I felt like you get a great sense about what Ireland truly was like, not the hyped up St Patty's day Irish. I also loved seeing so much of the world through Cyril's eyes, the various places he traveled and lived in.
I could keep going, I found the whole thing so incredibly interesting to read. It was an easy 5 stars in my opinion!

On the question of the Cyril-Julian relationship: it is almost a cliché in gay lit for the gay man to have an obsessive, unrequited love for an unobtainable str8 friend, but I thought Boyne totally nailed how that often progresses, even with long stretches of being apart.
Some of the characters lack complicity, it is true, but I think you have to forgive that in an essentially comic romp - I absolutely ADORED Maude & Charles Avery and their obtuseness was a large part of their...charm?


I loved the fact that Maud finally made it on to the tea towel! There are lots of good jabs at the writing 'industry' (short books are best?!)

I have finished the book: My review.
I liked many aspects of it - it is an easy read and quite funny in places. I thought the central story about the harshness of the law in Ireland and its effects on the gay community and unmarried mothers were well handled. My reservations were mostly structural - for me there were just too many convenient coincidences, and I couldn't quite believe that the key events of anyone's life would fall into such a neat pattern, so I never quite lost sight of the author wielding his puppet strings.
My copy came with a little afterword from Boyne, in which he said the germ of the novel came from a comment he heard at the time of the referendum from an old man saying (I am paraphrasing because I don't have the book in front of me) that it was a great day but it had come 50 years too late for him, and that this line was better than anything he had ever written.
I liked many aspects of it - it is an easy read and quite funny in places. I thought the central story about the harshness of the law in Ireland and its effects on the gay community and unmarried mothers were well handled. My reservations were mostly structural - for me there were just too many convenient coincidences, and I couldn't quite believe that the key events of anyone's life would fall into such a neat pattern, so I never quite lost sight of the author wielding his puppet strings.
My copy came with a little afterword from Boyne, in which he said the germ of the novel came from a comment he heard at the time of the referendum from an old man saying (I am paraphrasing because I don't have the book in front of me) that it was a great day but it had come 50 years too late for him, and that this line was better than anything he had ever written.
Doug wrote: "it was actually the first Western nation to legalize same-sex marriage"
I don't think it was technically the first by any criterion, but there are plenty of more liberal countries that have not got there yet (they were behind England, Scotland and Wales but ahead of Northern Ireland).
I don't think it was technically the first by any criterion, but there are plenty of more liberal countries that have not got there yet (they were behind England, Scotland and Wales but ahead of Northern Ireland).
I have been looking through the friend reviews for this book and I don't think I have ever seen so many at 5 stars. This makes me feel a little churlish, as I came quite close to going for 3 rather than 4.
In structural terms (and in historical sweep and name dropping) it is a little reminiscent of William Boyd's Any Human Heart, which for me was another book that had brilliant moments but was less than the sum of its parts.
In structural terms (and in historical sweep and name dropping) it is a little reminiscent of William Boyd's Any Human Heart, which for me was another book that had brilliant moments but was less than the sum of its parts.

I loved this book also, and was glad to read your thoughts to remind me that we hear from Cyril from before he was born. This hooked me into wanting to know more. I would add to the sentiment about Cyril not opening up to Julian years before that in addition to legal issues, the shame of being gay and the fear of rejection had to play into that and much of Cyril's other behavior and self-obsession (that Lucy pointed out). In much of his early life he was trying to appear "normal" and not doing a very good job of it, hurting himself and others.

I like how this book shows the sweep of history through one person's story. I recently read another 5-star book that did the same, Fair and Tender Ladies which takes place from 1915 to the early '70's in Appalachia. I can think of a few other books that do this, something I've come to like.
Did anyone else listen to The Heart's Invisible Furies? It was an outstanding audiobook. I've heard the narrator before in a couple of Tana French's books.

I don't think it was technically the first by any criterion, but there are plenty of more liberal countries that..."
Oops - I just took Boyne's word for that, since he mentioned it as an impetus for writing the book, but in doing some research, see that he was incorrect! :-( It gets tricky though, in deciding what constitutes 'marriage' as there are many instances of recognizing same-sex partnerships earlier, but those aren't technically 'marriage'.

I don't think it was technically the first by any criterion, but there are plenty of more liberal c..."
I'm wondering if there's a clue about "the first country" in this quote from the interview you shared, Doug. . . . within 25 years we were set to become the first country in the world to vote by public plebiscite for same-sex marriage. Perhaps, Ireland was the first country to vote for same-sex marriage rather than legislate it. And thanks for posting the interview in the discussion thread.

I don't think it was technically the first by any criterion, but there are plenty of m..."
Ah, thank you - that might indeed explain the discrepancy! Eagle eye you've got there!! :-)

Although I am not much of a television watcher, I find Boyne reminds me of "Saturday Night Live," with its broadside humor and sometimes satire. I've said already I'm reminded of Fielding's Tom Jones and of Dickens's orphans, foster parents, judicial and slum settings,... I find myself wishing I had read Tom Jones more recently. Also, are the ghosts of Tristan Shandy (Sterne) and Jonathan Swift lurking here?
I am intrigued by Boyne's character creation. They seem memorable, even really minor ones often have a poignant point to make (like the three brothers in the Education office), yet they may abruptly become dispensable after Boyne has made use of them for the story points he wants to convey. Sometimes dispensable in most implausible scenarios, like two-for-one in the fall of Nelson's Pillar, let alone a confession booth!

https://www.goodreads.com/review/show....."
The link in your post did not work for me this morning, Doug.

I also wanted to share a stellar review from one of my GR friends, Will Byrnes. I always eagerly await reading his reviews once I've finished a book and his review of The Heart's did not disappoint. He always includes additional resources, interviews with the author and such. Enjoy! https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...

Suzy -- Thanks for the link to Byrne's review!
How about a link to yours?

Glad to oblige, Lily. https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
Are you still in process? :)

Yes! Other demands, reading and otherwise, have interfered, and probably will continue to do so for the next couple of weeks! Thx for asking....



Books mentioned in this topic
Any Human Heart (other topics)Fair and Tender Ladies (other topics)
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
Rather than proffering specific topics, as I usually do when moderating, I think I will let the group guide the discussion - so dig in and share what your thoughts are! This thread is for discussion of the book as a whole, and spoilers ARE allowed. There is a separate thread for general discussion, in which spoilers are NOT allowed.