Actors Unite! discussion

Self-taping Auditions: Dream-come-true? Or Nightmare Unfolding?

Comments Showing 1-2 of 2 (2 new)    post a comment »
dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Kevin (new)

Kevin Page (kevin_page) | 6 comments Mod
Professional film & TV acting (and even stage acting to a lesser degree) has been both revolutionized and degraded by the proliferation of mobile digital technology. It seems like, in a flash, the industry has moved to a trend of self-taping at least initial auditions and sometimes even hiring important roles solely on the merits of an actor-produced audition clip. A few years ago, this would have been unthinkable. But now that everyone has a cellphone in their pocket, with the same resolution that used to only be the domain of broadcast cameras, casting directors have been forced to take advantage of that technological shift in order to keep their own businesses competitive. They simply don't have time, or budget, any more to schedule days and days of live auditions when they can get 200 quality tapes merely by sending out a breakdown.

This has had a couple of effects on the actor community. First, it has leveled the playing field for newer people getting into the business. If you can produce a viable and compelling audition tape in your living room, you actually might have a shot of booking a role (particularly on a show that is shooting on location and is hiring locals to take advantage of filming incentives) that formerly would have only gone to an agented actor. For those more seasoned performers, it has opened up even more floodgates of competition.

However you view it, as an opportunity or a competitive deluge, self-taping is clearly here to stay. And with it, one thing has become very clear: self-taping advantages those who can make a helluva good self-tape! In order to reliably do this on short notice, you need to have access to good lighting and at least a set up for your I-phone (if not a full-on video camera or DSLR) that can produce both good images and clear sound of the actor's voice (at least equal to the quality of a tape made in the casting directors office. need to be able to act, on cue, under those physical circumstances I have just described, at a level that clearly demonstrates your talent and ability to actually perform the role. This is a place where you don't want to get out over your skis, particularly if you are submitting through your agent, because if you send in a lousy performance, you will quickly burn up all your bridges.

I happen to like self-taping and view it as an opportunity. I've been at this a long time. I work well (sometimes even better) under pressure. And, I was a documentary filmmaker for about a decade, so I have a firm grasp on the hardware and software necessary to produce high-quality, fast turnaround tapes. Those are all competitive advantages for me, plus I can audition for stuff in nearby locations without having to travel for free until I book the job. So I am loving it!

For the other actors out there that have experienced this transformation to the self-taping age, What's your story? Do you like or despise the freedom/challenge of self-taping? How did you learn the work flow (cameras, editing software, uploading, etc)? Any advice, wisdom, or funny horror stories to share with those just learning?

Let the debate begin: Self-taping--Dream-come-true? Or Nightmare Unfolding?

message 2: by W.M. (new)

W.M. (psybok) | 4 comments I have done the self taping routine several times. I find it to be easier in some cases than a face to face audition. My agent got me an audition for a well known show that films in Albuquerque. For me to go to New Mexico for a face to face audition, would have been cost prohibitive.

While I didn't book that part, my face has now been seen by the CD's there, who cast for quite a few other shows. You never know.

I have booked from self taping. So, again, it comes down to you never know. It does lend a certain convenience.

There is a story that Benedict Cumberbatch taped an audition for J.J. Abrahms using an i-Phone and booked the role of Khan in Star Trek:Into Darkness. Cumberbatch was in London at the time, and Abrahms was in L.A.

back to top