Goodreads Librarians Group discussion

Full Service Blonde (Copper Black Mystery, #0)
This topic is about Full Service Blonde
22 views
Book Issues > Sorting Out the Copper Black Mysteries

Comments Showing 1-7 of 7 (7 new)    post a comment »
dateDown arrow    newest »

George | 292 comments For one thing, this is a Copper Black mystery but not so marked in the title here.

For another, the other one with the same investigator, Getting Off on Frank Sinatra, https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3..., displays "(Copper Black Mystery #1)" but it is not formatted as a link.

For yet another, as noted in my review at https://www.goodreads.com/review/show..., this seems to be Copper Black Mystery #0.5, not #2, despite the order of publication. I'm not sure if that can be accepted on my word alone, or whether the publisher and/or author can be contacted to verify, but nevertheless I make the claim.

Thank you.


message 2: by Sandra (new)

Sandra | 22766 comments Created the series.

Full Service Blonde is stated it is a prequel in the description, so I've numbered it #0, as it is a full novel of over 300 pages.

https://www.goodreads.com/series/2295...


message 3: by George (last edited Mar 20, 2018 06:47AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

George | 292 comments Whooops! Read right over that!

Thank you; that works.


message 4: by rivka, Librarian Moderator (new)

rivka | 41704 comments Mod
Marked as non-primary series element.


George | 292 comments rivka wrote: "Marked as non-primary series element."

I think that's a bad idea, ma'am. It's as material to her whole arc as the other one is, in my opinion.


message 6: by rivka, Librarian Moderator (new)

rivka | 41704 comments Mod
It's not a judgment on the book's relevance to the series. Prequels are always marked as non-primary series elements on Goodreads.


George | 292 comments Ah! Given that's the standard, thank you for following it. (Not that I like the standard, but since the best way of getting rid of a bad law is to enforce it strictly ...)


back to top