Terminalcoffee discussion

91 views
Rants / Debates (Serious) > Does "under God" belong in the pledge of allegiance?

Comments Showing 51-74 of 74 (74 new)    post a comment »
« previous 1 2 next »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 51: by Félix (new)

Félix (habitseven) Boing.


message 52: by TxLadyForever (new)

TxLadyForever | 190 comments Michelle wrote: "
I believe that putting God in the pledge has blessed our country. Until recently our country as a whole projected a faith based society. "


changing the words of the pledge would be akind to changing the words to a famous poem or song or book. Change is not always for the better!


Jackie "the Librarian" | 8991 comments Of course, "under God" is not part of the original Pledge of Allegiance, so we have already changed the words to it. The rhythm is off because of it.

If we wanted to respect the intent of the originators, we should remove the addition.


message 54: by Sally, la reina (new)

Sally (mrsnolte) | 17373 comments Mod
I nominate Jackie for president.


message 55: by Félix (new)

Félix (habitseven) Second!


Jackie "the Librarian" | 8991 comments Thanks, guys, that's sweet, but I'm pretty happy with the one we've got at the moment.
You can keep me in reserve for the future... :)


message 57: by Félix (new)

Félix (habitseven) How about being governor of Alaska?


Jackie "the Librarian" | 8991 comments Heh, I don't think the Alaskans would want me, Larry.


message 59: by Félix (new)

Félix (habitseven) Their loss.


message 60: by Sally, la reina (new)

Sally (mrsnolte) | 17373 comments Mod
I nominate Jackie for president of coolness, guys. Not the country.


message 61: by Félix (new)

Félix (habitseven) Oh, well sure. Goes without saying.


Jackie "the Librarian" | 8991 comments :::blushes, feels extra dorky:::


message 63: by Donitello (new)

Donitello | 148 comments Jackie "the Librarian" wrote: "Of course, "under God" is not part of the original Pledge of Allegiance, so we have already changed the words to it."

Fascinating -- I didn't know that. It's true, the rhythm IS off with that phrase! Okay, any quick links you could provide on the origins of the Pledge, (because I'm lazy)?




Jackie "the Librarian" | 8991 comments Here you go, Doni:

The Strange Origin of the Pledge of Allegiance

http://www.lectlaw.com/files/cur10.htm


message 65: by Lobstergirl, el principe (new)

Lobstergirl | 24825 comments Mod
No, under God does not belong in the pledge, and the pledge does not belong in schools. Save it for the military. What @19 said.


message 66: by Dennis (new)

Dennis I'm okay with it. I hope the pledge stays the way it is currently written.


message 67: by Scout (new)

Scout (goodreadscomscout) | 3598 comments America is composed of people from all cultures and religions, but this country was founded on a belief in God and on certain moral principles. No one should have to recite a pledge he or she doesn't believe in, but the moral principles should stand as the foundation of our identity as a nation. I think our foundation is crumbling, and I think that those who hate us are happy about that. They have unified and unwavering religious beliefs, and that makes them strong.


message 68: by Jim (new)

Jim | 6484 comments I have no problem with the pledge the way it is now either, as long as it isn't mandatory for all to have to recite it.


message 69: by Phil (new)

Phil | 11855 comments ...this country was founded on a belief in God...

No. Try again.


message 70: by Lobstergirl, el principe (new)

Lobstergirl | 24825 comments Mod
When we declared our independence, we invoked God. We said God was something in Nature, or ruled over Nature ("Nature's God") and that our "Creator" had given us our rights. We said that it was God who entitled us to be free, and to declare ourselves independent from another nation or state. When we established the founding legal document of our nation (the Constitution), we included the idea of religious freedom.


message 71: by Phil (new)

Phil | 11855 comments Completely different from saying the country was "founded on a belief in God."

Also, when the "rules" were established, mention of ANY deity was DELIBERATELY avoided. The rule of law is entirely secular, no matter how much religionists wish it weren't.


message 72: by Scout (new)

Scout (goodreadscomscout) | 3598 comments Completely different in what way?


message 73: by Phil (new)

Phil | 11855 comments Scout, using you as an example....

You have certain religious beliefs yet, if you chose to, you could easily create a set of rules that, while informed by those beliefs, did not incorporate them or their associated deity.

Secular laws can easily be created even by the most religious among us. And secular laws are exactly what we, as a country, are governed by.


message 74: by Scout (new)

Scout (goodreadscomscout) | 3598 comments I was asking how Lg's statement was completely different from my saying that our country was founded on a belief in God. Go back and read the posts.


« previous 1 2 next »
back to top