Crimson Bound
discussion
Devourer & Ending Questions. Help!
date
newest »


It would have been awesome if there was more clarification to the whole situation, I felt it lacked in world building. But I'm glad you liked it! Since you rated it far higher than I did.
all discussions on this book |
post a new topic
Was the Devourer defeated?
In the end, Zisa says that she couldn't defeat the Devourer because she ultimately didn't bring one of the swords. Rachelle has Durendal so she can defeat the Devourer,
EXCEPT Zisa says that nothing really "dies" hmmmmm.
Rachelle can't look upon the Devourer without being devoured, which leaves her the choice to weave the charm to devour itself.
So... was it defeated? Erec was devoured, but was he just destroyed or just contained/bound like Zisa and Tyr were able to do? If it wasn't defeated, what was the point??
-----
Also, how did you all understand the relationship between the Devourer and the forest?
Is the forest devoured?
When the forest lives on at the end, we guess that the forest is something separate, something older. It would be interesting to learn how the Devourer became what it is, came to power over the forest and the world.
----
Thank you!!