Beyond Reality discussion
Previous BotM--DISCUSSIONS
>
2009-08 Other books by Iain (M.) Banks
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Ron
(new)
Aug 02, 2009 12:32AM

reply
|
flag
This is my first and I didn't realize that there were so many "Culture" novels! I thought there were 3 but I think there are 7... I'll be looking for more at the used books stores I frequent.

I've read every Culture novel, some of which are on my all-time favorite list - especially The Player of Games and Use of Weapons. The most recent one, "Matter", was also excellent. Also read the stand-alone "The Algebraist", which I wasn't that fond of, and the non-SF books "The Bridge" and "The Wasp Factory". It's ironic (and frustrating) that my two least favorite of his books, The Algebraist and Consider Phlebas, are the two books we've had as Book of the Month here! I'd really recommend to anyone who didn't enjoy those books to try "The Player of Games" and "Use of Weapons".

Use of Weapons is one of the best Science Fiction novels I've read. The quality of the writing is very high and the unusual structure of the flashback chapters is done very well. There's a very effective sense of foreboding, you just know something terrible is going to happen at the end of the novel, but I still wasn't expecting the ending. It is very fast-paced with a lot of great scenes. Zakalwe is a very memorable protagonist.
The Player of Games is probably the second-best book in the series, an entertaining and intelligent novel with an unusual focus on the psychology of playing games.
Excession was also good, although marred a bit by an uninteresting sub-plot. It's probably the best novel for really exploring the full potential of the Science Fiction setting.
Inversions was fairly good, although only loosely connected to the Culture. In many ways, it feels more like an Epic Fantasy novel than an SF novel. Another very intelligent novel, although maybe not quite as entertaining as the best Culture novels.
Look to Windward was also intelligent, but maybe slightly dull at times although it did have its good moments.
I wasn't too keen on The State of the Art, I didn't think there was much of interest beyond the novelty of the Culture encountering 1970s Earth.
William, I definitely recommend Matter. IMO, it's the third best book in the series (after The Player of Games and Use of Weapons). I was so relieved to read that book - I was worrying that he'd lost his touch after The Algebraist.
I just realize I never read The State of the Art. I wasn't even aware it's a Culture novel!
I just realize I never read The State of the Art. I wasn't even aware it's a Culture novel!


I don't know the Culture novels at all. Reading "Consider Phlebas" is being plopped down in the middle of a space opera midstream. (Which is okay, in a Star Wars kind of way.)

Note I HAVEN'T read his horror books, I've heard The Wasp Factory is excellent but I'm much too susceptible to any creepy factor!



I do have it on my to-be-read pile (and the non-Culture SF novel Against A Dark Background), will probably read it sometime in the next few months.
State of the Art is a collection of short stories. I believe only the title novella is a Culture story.
IIRC there was at least one other Culture story, called A Gift from the Culture

I also read The Wasp Factory recently because I was interested in reading something of Banks outside of the science fiction genre. I have mixed feelings about this one. I think it's well written, but I found it so disturbing I could barely continue reading to the end.

William, of course you're right, I had forgotten "A Gift from the Culture".

OK, I'm not quite done with _Consider Phlebas_ and have not read any other books by this author. Can someone explain why this book is considered one of his weakest? Plot? Characters?
I'm asking because I think this book is excellent, but as I have said many times, I am not a very "critical" reader, so I'm looking for some insight.
I'm asking because I think this book is excellent, but as I have said many times, I am not a very "critical" reader, so I'm looking for some insight.
Well, it's not so much that Consider Phlebas is a bad book --- it's more that some of his others are brilliant, so CP pales a bit in comparison. I read CP a long time ago and don't remember all of the details, but I remember feeling the same way, wondering why so many people said this is his worst book. Then I read "The Player of Games" and "Use of Weapons", and I agreed - CP isn't bad per se, just not as good as some of the others.
It's similar in a way to the Vorkosigan books. I thought the first 2 books were okay, not bad but not great - but then compared to the later books, it's clear how much better Bujold became as a writer.
It's similar in a way to the Vorkosigan books. I thought the first 2 books were okay, not bad but not great - but then compared to the later books, it's clear how much better Bujold became as a writer.
