Anything Legal, Legal Thrillers, Legal Mysteries and More discussion
Debate Corner
>
story elements
date
newest »



You answered it well. Perhaps Ms. Goldilocks is wrong with respect to balance between the elements. Might our opinions also be genre dependent? A novel about a trial might require a lot of back story, for example. I love to learn about characters too, as long as they seem real.
r/Steve
This is more a poll than a debate question, but maybe I can generate some of the latter? When I read a review and the reviewer says, "This is a great character study," I cringe. When I see "action-packed roller coaster ride," same reaction. We all know plot, characterization, dialogue, action, settings, and so forth are important story elements, but what do you feel about a book that emphasizes one over the other?
I'm a fan of Goldilocks myself. She wanted the bed that was just right (maybe thinking more about baring it with the bears?). Do you prefer books that balance all story elements? Or do you prefer books that emphasize one element over all others? Legal thrillers are often more introspective than other thrillers. Is that a negative or a positive?
Weigh in with your opinions.
r/Steve
PS. This is really a question about the Goldilocks Principle applied to writing. Because readers rule, it seems that your opinions should affect how writers apply the Principle.