Best Fantasy Books Subgenre Reading Challenge discussion
General
>
New subgenres all the time?
date
newest »


A.L. wrote: "Since this is my first foray into fantasy, my opinion may be irrelevant and sound uneducated (which it is within the fantasy genre), but here goes - for a newbie fantasy reader, it can get confusin..."
That's exactly one of the things I hope to explore in this group - whether all these subgenres are different enough to warrant separate subgenres, according to each person's opinion, and whether we think the chosen books really do fit into their designated subgenre. I hope there will plenty of discussion on how to tell these subgenres apart, what defines them, preferences, and whether the books/authors make it easy to tell the difference or not. I think it will be really interesting, and I can't wait to hear opinions and ideas that I undoubtedly will not have thought of myself.
I also prefer names that in themselves tell what the subgenre's purpose is. Although I can't resist looking up what subgenres like "Fantastique" are. :)
That's exactly one of the things I hope to explore in this group - whether all these subgenres are different enough to warrant separate subgenres, according to each person's opinion, and whether we think the chosen books really do fit into their designated subgenre. I hope there will plenty of discussion on how to tell these subgenres apart, what defines them, preferences, and whether the books/authors make it easy to tell the difference or not. I think it will be really interesting, and I can't wait to hear opinions and ideas that I undoubtedly will not have thought of myself.
I also prefer names that in themselves tell what the subgenre's purpose is. Although I can't resist looking up what subgenres like "Fantastique" are. :)

Tom wrote: "I agree the title of a sub-genre should be descriptive, such as Heroic Fantasy. Easy to see that such a book is about heroes in a fantasy setting. As said above, :Fantastique" tells nothing, and as..."
Good to know what a well read fantasy fan thinks of a non-descriptive subgenre! It's a nice-sounding title but it doesn't say much.
Good to know what a well read fantasy fan thinks of a non-descriptive subgenre! It's a nice-sounding title but it doesn't say much.

Forgive any typos in this post. Typing on my phone over my first cup of coffee is a recipe for disaster!
Josh wrote: "Personally, I have found that the fantasy books that blend genres tend to be the better overall. The more categories you add to any sort of mix, the more crossover you're going to have. That said, ..."
That's very true, the more interweaved a fantasy book is between subgenres, the more varied and complete it can be. It's also true that some fantasy books/movies are so overwhelmingly popular that it's hard to imagine anything beyond them. Fortunately for us, there's tons more beyond those that are heavily advertised.
Your minimal typos are always welcome, as are your opinions. :)
That's very true, the more interweaved a fantasy book is between subgenres, the more varied and complete it can be. It's also true that some fantasy books/movies are so overwhelmingly popular that it's hard to imagine anything beyond them. Fortunately for us, there's tons more beyond those that are heavily advertised.
Your minimal typos are always welcome, as are your opinions. :)
I think fantasy is particularly subject to new mixes of subgenres because it's a genre of escape and it relies on new worlds, magic, and other elements that encourage the mind to go outside the box.
Do you like that there are so many subgenres of fantasy? Or do you think the lines can be so blurry between them that it's not worth it to have so many separate subgenres?