Audiobooks discussion
Archives
>
Audible - Small Vent
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Vicki
(new)
Nov 20, 2013 03:06PM

reply
|
flag

Yes. There are some problems with the database, most annoying.
If you also have a Kindle (which means you have a Manage My Kindle account), you will find that there the Kindle books and the Audible books sort the authors' names differently; one is LastName FirstName, the other is FirstName LastName. Most annoying.
The search function is persnickety; often I find that it won't pull up books I know I own, it just hasn't quite recognized my input, unless it exactly matches its little memory.

I had been thinking it was just me who couldn't manage a simple search of My Library. Sometimes it works like a charm, other times more like a curse.

..."
Well and succinctly said.



Hey Tim,
Good question! We do not transfer old reviews to a re-released versions because we want the reviews to reflect the audiobook in terms of narration and performance, as well as content.
If the audiobook was re-released, there's a good chance the audio was re-produced with a better quality or a different narrator. We just want the most accurate reviews available to our customers.
We hope this helps!

But you include reviews that are from Amazon & aren't for audiobook editions...

That's true, Leslie. Amazon reviews are included as supplementary info because, in our opinion, they reflect the content-only.
We do not transfer reviews from old to new because we want the review to reflect the version that you are interested in purchasing.
Let us know if you have any other questions!

So, your members reviews doesn't count more than Amazon? Many of us here are huge Audible fans and I probably listen to about 90-100 titles an year and write most of the reviews. I think, Audible just needs to take another look on the policy because I always look for other Audible members reviews and never read Amazon's.

Tim, no matter what they do, someone isn't happy. If I want to know about the current production, I would want reviews on the current production, not the one it replaced. Don't take it personally if they don't migrate your review.

Another problem that this crops up is with is the freebies. Now, I absolutely love it when Audible decides to give its members free audiobooks for whatever reason. Over the last couple of Christmases, I've received A Christmas Carol narrated by Tim Curry, How the Grinch Stole Christmas! narrated by Walter Matthau, and a few others. I have listened to and rated these freebies on Audible. However, when I look up the book on the site, it doesn't show that I even own the book, much less rated it. I can find it by searching my library, but that's it. As far as I can tell, there isn't anything to even stop me from buying one of these books that I already own because the freebie is considered a different "edition" even though it's exactly the same production.

Yes, you are right. Take for example A Wild Sheep Chase, it's the same production from the publisher, but the audio was release in 2006, but now it got release as 2013. It's the same book with the same reader. I don't think that the author decided to rewrite all of his titles either. In this case, Audible should migrate the reviews over.
I bought and reviewed A Feast for Crows with a different narrator other than Roy Dotrice. They redid that book with Roy Dotrice. I understand that the production is different between the two. So, I understand that they don't want to migrate the reviews over.
As for Murakami, they are not new releases. They are all the same books with the same production.

So, your members reviews doesn't count more than A..."
You can review on Amazon as well. Just put (Audible) next to the title of your review then it will be there anyway and will catch people who are looking for Audible reviews.
Books mentioned in this topic
A Christmas Carol (other topics)How the Grinch Stole Christmas! (other topics)