City of Bones
discussion
Thoughts on the movie?!?!
date
newest »


That said, I'll never begrudge a movie for taking creative lisence to tell a long story in a shorter way (if a platonic slow dance between two friends set to a Nick Cave song makes up for multiple chapters of being on the road alone like in The Deathly Hallows, more power to them) So choices about changing the order of the storyline aren't necessarilly always a bad thing.
Also about the spoiler they revealed in the first movie, it's dodgy in case some people are seeing the movie before they continue the books, but otherwise a sound choice. A lot of people abandoned the books because of that and the movies simply couldn't afford to lose viewership over something like that. Movie fans, overall, are nowhere NEAR as loyal as book fans simply because reading someone's book is far more intimate. I think it's funny, but then I never thought that `twist` was very clever in the first place, just a vehicle to Clare's odd fetish.
I thought the Portal was ridiculous though. Lol.
Lamidri: it's okay, visually and tonally it did a good job, the acting was serviceable and the writing was at times atrocious and at others snappy. Take it or leave it, it tried. I do have to say though, that there were many many times I found myself laughing at parts that weren't supposed to be funny which is probably not the desired affect.

That said, I'll never begrudge a movi..."
I agree about the spoiler bit, and for the most part, I know they have to cut a few things or change them to fit a 500 page book into a 2 hour film. However, some things didn't make sense. Why have the vampire put something in Simon's drink when they just kidnap him anyway? What was the point if he doesn't even change? And I agree, the portal was definitely interesting. Though Valentine never would have fallen for that little trick Jace used on the film Valentine.
Overall, I just really wanted something smoother. I felt the film was very ADD and just made the book look bad.

Resumiendo, como película es entretenida, pero como adaptación no acaba de dar el pego. Aún así recomiendo verla, ya que nunca esta de más tener una opinión propia.

That said, I'll never begrudge a movi..."
I agree with you Samantha.
I just re-read the book today and I'm glad the movie changed many parts of the book (particularly many of the religion references).
I also agree that the "spoiler" was predictable anyway so I;'m glad the movie did away with it. But I do think they rushed it and it ought to have been longer. Some of Jace's sarcastic comments were completely removed or re-told in scenes that don't really make sense (e.g. when Clary asks if he's gonna tear his shirt).

So I read your review before I saw the movie determined that you should be wrong, well I saw it today and you were totally right! I liked the cast but, the screen play was horrible!! I took my sister who did not read the books and, she was so confused. I understand making changes for a movie but, at least keep the essence of the story and stay true to the story line! Ugh I was so frustrated. I am so confused on what's going to happen in the second movie.

That sa..."
Agree


Isabelle was less pretty and attractive than Clary, which contradicts the story. Alec was not stunningly handsome and way too old than the book.
And Valentine? The scary and stern Valentine has changed into an angrily screaming old teenager. The braids? Why didn't they insert Jack Sparrow into the story instead?
I love TMI but the movie is rather disappointing.

To whom may concern:
I had enjoyed watching the film I even went and watch it twice in movie theater and I don't go watch movie because I dislike movie theater I find the sound system to laud for my ears. my sister is the same way
but we both endured the sound system. because we want more movie of the mortal instruments series.
Best respectfully koleen

Things I hated.
1. The garden scene... How cliche and cheesy can you get?
2. Valentine's dread locks...I told myself I wouldn't mind but they were just...THERE. Seriously, let's not dye his hair but instead, let's slap those on there? NO.
3.Clary, clary everywhere...to be honest I never liked her as the main character. Also, I took a sip of my drink every time she tripped. My bladder suffered that night.
4. The exchange between Valentine and Hodge...it was great until Hodge says that one thing about lying about you know what. The you know what that it took readers three books to figure out but the general audience got to know in three seconds. WTF!?? Screw you scriptwriters.
5. Magnus...it absolutely kills me to say I did not like this guy. This was not Magnus Bane. Sure he looked the part--the guy was GORGEOUS. But it looked like the editor dubbed some other guy's voice over Godfrey's lines and it just didn't work. Compared to the other actors he was weak and I was expecting him to steal the show.
Things I loved
1. Alec...just wow. I really didn't appreciate his character until now. Thank you for putting Clary in her place. Also, he was pretty sexy and I cried a little when he was poisoned.
2. Simon...'nuff said.


all discussions on this book |
post a new topic
I thought the casting was great, except I thought the way they depicted Magnus and Isabelle were almost totally off. Loved Jamie as Jace and Robert as Simon. Kevin made a better Alec than I'd anticipated. The costumes, cgi, and settings were perfect. I pretty much loved everything save for the screenplay. The woman who wrote it should be fired. To be honest, I wholeheartedly believe this series could have been the next huge epic had they stayed true to the book.