Literally Geeky discussion

This topic is about
Redshirts
Redshirts
>
Redshirts Discussion
date
newest »

In terms of its existential plotline, Redshirts reminded me very much of a book called 'Sophie's World' - my gateway into philosophy (in fact it's almost a 'Philosophy for Dummies' disguised as a novel) and quite revelatory at the time. There fact that there were so many comparable points between the two (despite their disparate subject matter), was one of the reasons I felt so strongly about Redshirts.

Anyway. In my opinion, I think it was definitely meant to be a scifi, humour novel, with some thought-provoking moments in it. Unfortunately, it wasn't my cup of tea.

Personally, I enjoyed Redshirts. I devoured it in a trip home from Liverpool and my one major complaint is the constant "he said/she said" during conversations, but there are some readers and authors who prefer that so I'll put it down to different stylistic preferences.
When I picked up the book I did not expect to laugh out loud throughout. I thought the perspective of the redshirts would be fun. What I found as I turned the pages was not what I expected. I think this happened to others, but unlike those in the hangout, I was not entirely disappointed. Instead, I marvelled at the philosophy of existence questions that were raised. Not only were the redshirts controlled by the Narrative, but all of the characters were under the influence of the Author. So what is life really and how much control do we have over our actions?
Also, in case you missed it the codas are written in 1st, 2nd and 3rd person.
The deaths of redshirts are absurd and ridiculous and mockingly fun. But the book is not and should not be categorized as humour. I think you could comfortably shelve it with your philosophy books.
@DragonStepsOut