SDMB - Straight Dope discussion
100 books every child should read
date
newest »

I've read a reasonable number of them, though many not as a child. The list seems unrepresentative to me, at least from a US perspective.
For example, "The Tale of Samuel Whiskers" seems prescriptive and eclectic rather than reflective of children's actual reading habits--it has hardly been the Potter book that comes to mind.
For example, "The Tale of Samuel Whiskers" seems prescriptive and eclectic rather than reflective of children's actual reading habits--it has hardly been the Potter book that comes to mind.


My son's school has a pretty good incentive plan for reading. They earn points according to the length and difficulty of a book and they get rewards for meeting their goal. The only problem is that my son is reluctant to read books that aren't on the school's list because they aren't worth any points. In my opinion, science fiction and fantasy are sadly underrepresented. :) But it does give the kids a wide enough choice that they can pick something they enjoy.

I think I have only read one or two books from the first two sections, then the majority of the third.
I do enjoy looking at such lists for some masochistic reason. :D

Middle - 20
Teen - 21
I think the list is not only English-centric, but also dated. Dickens/Kipling/Stevenson and all of the Victorian authors are really difficult for kids today to read because language has changed. If you have to stop once a page to explain an arcane word or phase that doesn't promote joy of reading.
Yes, I'm one of those Let-them-read-Harry-Potter-at-least-they're-reading crowd. :)
With some thought I could add where's this book forever, but really, no Tuck Everlasting or Bridge to Terabithia or any Ray Bradbury? No classic horror at least on the teen list - Dracula, Frankenstein, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde?

Part 2: 14
Part 3: 14
Personally I love this list. It shows a nice sampling of British-esque lit & a lot of the books have a darker flavour.
I'll be adding a few more to my wish list!

and not that there's anything wrong with harry potter. it's well written and follows all the same story arcs and rules as the classics. although they should probably read the entire series, and not just prisoner of azkaban (even if that was the best one). being anti-potter though just seems to carry a bit of the same arrogance that makes hipsters who will stop listening to an obscure band the moment they start to become successful. just because the masses love it doesn't always mean it's slop.

in spite of all their best efforts though, i still love reading. i'm fairly certain i learned more about the english language and how it works from reading than i did from class; i have no idea how to conjugate a sentence anymore; i'm not even sure i remember what conjugate even means. but it's not important. at least i can type the correct version of they're their and there when i'm having an argument online! that's a lot more than most, apparently. i think it had a lot to do with my parents though, who gave me time to read and had an extensive library themselves. they didn't try and limit me because of my age, and only once or twice warned that something might be too mature for me to understand (although i usually read it anyway).
What do you think? And how many of the books have you read? I haven't counted yet.
Julie