The Fault in Our Stars
discussion
Does anyone get the title?
message 1:
by
Alice
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Mar 19, 2013 02:57PM

reply
|
flag
*



"Were she better, or you sicker, then the stars would not be so terribly crossed, but it is the nature of stars to cross, and never was Shakespeare more wrong than when he had Cassius note, ‘The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars/But in ourselves" Peter was saying that the fault is in the nature of things..not in how you do them, or even just in yourself generally. This becomes important because it was "fate s fault" when Augustus died, not Gus' fault. So therefore, the Fault is In Our Stars, and we can do nothing about it. We don't have a choice in the matter. (Make sense now?)

Look at it this way: All of us are made of stardust, correct? Yes. Well maybe we can be deemed as stars on Earth. And the other stars/people closest to us can be seen as our stars. The fault in them is that they burn out, they die. Some before others, but everyone will eventually be subject to the same fate. It's a fault that we all possess and cannot stop.
Although I know what the book says might not fully support my view, it's still the way I see it. I didn't think about the title all too much. But when I did, what I said above is what came to mind.


I think it has to do with some type of astrology thing.


so i agree with the Peter Van Houten's disagreement with him about it..
because to me, everything that happens to us, happens because it's what God has planned for us (i'm Muslim so i think like that)
sometimes we make mistakes, but only because we were meant to make these mistakes




Emily wrote: "The title comes from the quote, "The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, but in ourselves, for we are underlings." That is Julius Ceasar by William Shakespeare, and so the title basically mean..."
EXACTLY WHAT I MEANT WHEN I SAID:
Peter Von Houten said to Augustus in his letter:
"Were she better, or you sicker, then the stars would not be so terribly crossed, but it is the nature of stars to cross, and never was Shakespeare more wrong than when he had Cassius note, ‘The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars/But in ourselves" Peter was saying that the fault is in the nature of things..not in how you do them, or even just in yourself generally. This becomes important because it was "fate s fault" when Augustus died, not Gus' fault. So therefore, the Fault is In Our Stars, and we can do nothing about it. We don't have a choice in the matter.
Lennie wrote: "If you do not understand why the title portains to this book, then you either didn't pay attention while reading it, or you shouldn't read stuff too complicated for you."
Hahahahaha, exactly what I thought when I read the discussion title.
Hahahahaha, exactly what I thought when I read the discussion title.

"Were she better, or you sicker, then the stars would not be so terribly crossed, but it is the nature of stars to cross, and never was Shakespeare ..."
this is also my hypothesis when i first read this book:) i really like how the author created the title. it's awesome:)

"Were she better, or you sicker, then the stars would not be so terribly crossed, but it is the nature of stars to cross, and never was Shakespeare ..."
well said. :))

you go girl!

you go girl!"
I agree!


Emily ..."
Agreed

I think the title is in that way
The Fault in our stars
The Fault in our destiny
The destiny is written in the stars as they have said a LONG TIME AGO
but i think that's it :)

I think it means that destiny isn't on their side
we have some geniuses around here.^
I agree with most of the comments, the title is perfect.
I agree with most of the comments, the title is perfect.

Look a..."
That's so poetic! I'm taking that as my new point of view on the title!

I guess it's because they have no fault about having cancer, the fault is from their stars, they stars have decided for them to have cancer and that's it. (bad english, sorry)

In some of his videos John has said what many of you have already said, that its taken from the Julius Ceaser quote, and he, like Van Houten, disagrees with Shakespeare that fault lies with ourselves. It lies with our stars. We can't help what happens to us.
Even if you don't watch John's videos, it's pretty obvious from Van Houtens letter to Gus.
Although I was really interested in everyone's theories, definitely knowing is less fun than coming up with my own meanings.

In some of his videos John has said what many of you have already said, that its taken from the Julius Ceaser quote, and he, like Van Houten, disa..."
I'm a nerdfighter!


in our stars but in ourselves.
I love that quote. You can dissect it to bits but even just as it is, it's beautiful.

I think that's true.

in our stars but in ourselves.
I love that quote. You can dissect it to bits but even just as it is, it's beautiful."
The whole point, in my opinion, is that the opposite is true. Hazel and Gus are completely blameless that they have terminal illnesses so when he says its "A Fault in Our Stars" it means that their tragedies were up to fate and not by their own doing.



Emily ..."
Jennifer wrote: "Peter Von Houten said to Augustus in his letter:
"Were she better, or you sicker, then the stars would not be so terribly crossed, but it is the nature of stars to cross, and never was Shakespeare ..."
thanks for the explanation. Jonh Green is very clever

I really like this explanation :-) I love the book, but I did not think of the title in that way. It makes perfectly sense :-)

I like the title name. I think it is suitable for the plot of the story, and it sounds quite nice.




WOW I love the way you think !! Your way of thinking never crossed my mind !
But I don't think that's the reason, the book is deep so having a kind of shallow meaning to the title is unlikely, but you never know...

"Were she better, or you sicker, then the stars would not be so terribly crossed, but it is the nature of stars to cross, and never was Shakespeare ..."
Yup
all discussions on this book |
post a new topic