European Royalty discussion
European Royalty Discussions
>
The Tudors

I really like Anne Boleyn (2nd wife) for some reason. She seemed smart and independent. I liked that she refused to be a king's mistress (although that helped lead to her demise). It's fascinating that Henry VIII chased after her for so long and was willing to go through so much to get her. It's equally fascinating (and sad) how quickly he tired of her once they married and she submitted. I've read quite a few non-fiction and fiction books about her (I'll have to list them later in my bookshelves).
I'd like to read more about Anne of Cleves (4th wife) and Katherine Howard (5th wife). They don't tend to get much focus.

Anne Boleyn was too smart for her own good, and like the saying goes, "if he did it to someone else, why wouldn't he do it to you, too?" I think though that she had too many people close to Henry who were against her for her to prevail. I don't believe that she ever really loved Henry either. She used him to gain power and then she never really figured out how to make that marriage work. That's why I think tht Katherine was much smarter than her in that regard.
An Innocent Traitor gets into Anne and Katherine H. more so than other books that I have read. Anne apparently had an odor problem and Katherine Howard seemed to be a good match for Henry, especially since he was in his later years. A Rose Without a Thorn by Jean Plaidy is about Howard. I have it, and I'm looking forward to reading it at some point.

Jean Plaidy's books dealing with Katherine of Aragon are excellent. Granted, I do tend to love all of Jean Plaidy's books, but I rated that ones on Katherine of Aragon five stars. You can buy all three of the books under one title (Katherine of Aragon). I have the older editions, so I read the books separately (Katharine, The Virgin Widow; The Shadow of the Pomegranate; The King's Secret Matter). What I especially love about these books is the focus Jean Plaidy gave to Katherine's early years with her family in Spain, Arthur and then Henry. Before I read these books, the only thing I really knew about Katherine was what I read in books about Anne Boleyn (which never covered Katherine's early years). Her early years with Henry were very romantic and loving, which does make it more shocking how he treated her in the end.
I read Jean Plaidy's trilogy about Isabella and Ferdinand prior to reading the Katherine of Aragon books. I really enjoyed them as well. I have read both sets of books twice actually. I don't believe they have been republished (at least I haven't seem them in the bookstores). The titles are Castile for Isabella, Spain for the Sovereigns, and Daughters of Spain. At one point, they may have been combined in one volume.

The trilogy on Isabella and Ferdinand sounds great. I'm going to try and find it. I always wonder if Isabella had lived whether that would have had an impact on Katherine's fate. Ferdinand wasn't as strong as one would think, and again, his treatment of his daughter is very emblematic of men's treatment of women during those times.


Showtime is making a 2nd season, which is supposed to premiere on March 30. Peter O'Toole is joining the cast as Pope Paul III. I can't wait!




I look forward to discussing it here!

As for wives, I'm rather partial to Katherine Parr. That's mostly because of Jan Wescott's 'The Queens Grace'. OOP, but ff you can afford a copy (or spy one at a yard sale) grab it! it is FABULOUS.
Her courageous remarriage to Jane Seymore's brother Tom and the romps between Tom and Elizabeth leave a lot of room for speculation.

I always feel so sad for Katherine Parr. Thanks for the book recommendation because I would like to read more about her. To be married to three old men (one who almost gets her killed) and then to have the supposed love of her life having some sort of relationship with her step daughter is just tragic. I think David Starkey's Elizabeth gets into the relationship between Tom Seymour and Elizabeth. I read the book and know that I enjoyed it, but I just can't remember many details from it.

What I didn't like was that the first half of the book was a reiteration of Henry VIII/Anne Boleyn history, with very little information about Jane (except for the "She must have felt...," "She could have been..." type of speculation.)



If you do start the Tudor series, let me know what you think.





hope everyone has a good weeknd.



:)



I have watched the first three episodes of The Tudors, but I'll have to make comments later. I'm enjoying it so far, but I'm starting to see where they are doing some crazy stuff with the historical accuracy.


SPOILERS - THE TUDORS SHOWTIME SERIES!
Yeah, Margaret with Charles Brandon instead of Mary was the first thing that really jumped out at me. All I can think of is they thought there were too many people named Mary so they decided to use the other sister's name. Also the fact that she's being married off to the King of Portugal instead of the King of France was an interesting twist. I guess they needed a different king since Frances is already on the throne in this series.
It's also a little strange how they have Anne Boleyn plotting with her dad and Norfolk to influence the king. From what I've read, I'm sure her dad and Norfolk certainly tried to use her to influence the king, but I never got the impression that Anne was ever involved with their plotting. Thomas Wyatt is a little disappointing - he's not the dashing figure I would have expected.
I do like some of the little touches they have though - Wolsey walking through the street with the orange, Henry asking about the calves of the King of France, Buckingham spilling the water on Wolsey - these were all things that I constantly read about, so it was neat to see them in the show. Regardless of how they mess around with certain historical facts, it does seem like the show is well researched overall.


Lady Jane is one of my favorite films about one of the most fascinating British Monarchs.
Last weekend I went to see the film 'The Other Boleyn Girl' and it was incredibly good but sooooooo historically incorrect!



Has anyone read the Other Boleyn Girl? Is it appropriate for young readers?



I like Katherine Swynford and John of Gaunt's story as well. I haven't read Alison Weir's book about them (yet), but I did read the novel about her by Anya Seton which was good. I'm not sure who I would consider my favorite English royal - I'll have to think about that!





Yes, With All My Heart is another one by Margaret Campbell Barnes. I've not read anything by Jean Plaidy, but I will check her out. MCB's books have been getting re-noticed lately, mostly due to the surge in interest in historical fiction. I generally find her books to be far more accurate and literary than most of what's been published recently (though I may be biased).


My favorite Tudor (with Elizabeth a close second) is Henry VIII. What a marvelously complex individual! I think what strikes me the most is his transformation from this handsome, perfect musician, theologian, and athlete to (let's face it) a tyrant. It makes me sad that most people seem to skip the first almost 20 years of his reign and focus on how he was later in life.
Books mentioned in this topic
Katharine of Aragon: The Wives of Henry VIII (other topics)Threads: The Reincarnation of Anne Boleyn (other topics)
I, Elizabeth (other topics)
I, Elizabeth (other topics)
I, Elizabeth (other topics)
More...
Henry VII, Henry VIII, Edward VI, Jane Grey, Mary I, Elizabeth I