Litwit Lounge discussion
The Classics
>
The Turn of the Screw & other short novels by Henry James
date
newest »



Anyone know which story in the collection it's associated with?

The governess' inference that the ghosts are drawn to the children, "For the love of all the evil the pair put into them. And to ply them with that evil still, to keep up the work of demons," is based on intuitions from the childrens' secretive behavior and their reactions to various incidents, coupled with Mrs. Grose's revelations about what went on during the evil pair's lifetimes. Understandably, a conclusion largely based on intuition seems suspect to many modern readers, but you have to understand that this is characteristic of James' style; his fiction is filled with characters who apprehend all sorts of significant truths by intuiting them. And in this case, the intuition also communicates itself readily to the reader --or, at least, to this reader! :-)

I'm so glad you explained about the intuitiveness. That is what had me confused. While I didn't doubt she was seeing ghosts, I couldn't follow how she perceived what it was they were after. To me, it felt like going from A-C. LOL, I fear I cheated myself of a more thrilling read by trying to remain so clear-headed about it. A little ironic as I often read with my emotions fully with me and not in check. :p
Books mentioned in this topic
The Turn of the Screw and Other Short Fiction (other topics)The Road (other topics)
Cause of Death (other topics)
***Warning: spoilers ahead!***
Having just answered a question on this on the Neverending Quiz, it seems most agree that this tale of Henry James is indeed a ghost story. It was strange reading it though. The one thing that had me doubting was the governess's ideas of just what the ghosts were after. This never quite came together for me: how could she be so sure they were after anything? After all, they seemed to only appear and watch: must a ghost be up to something rather than merely present?
Also, I don't remember discovering how the gardener (?) and the previous governess died. This may sound fundamental but was it the author's intention to be so vague?