Kristina's Reviews > The Book of Life
The Book of Life (All Souls Trilogy, #3)
by
by
Kristina's review
bookshelves: fiction, supernatural-creatures, library-book, omg-this-book-is-so-dumb, wtf
Jun 02, 2014
bookshelves: fiction, supernatural-creatures, library-book, omg-this-book-is-so-dumb, wtf
I guess the good news about Deborah Harkness’s The Book of Life is I didn’t throw it across the room in disgust. I couldn't—it's too damn dumb to make me angry. Mostly I shook my head in bewilderment at the overwhelming idiocy. This last book in the trilogy is pretty much the same as the first two: excessive details, wandering plot lines, horrible pacing, paper-thin characters, and fang-less boring vampires. When I finished reading all 561 pages, I thought: what the fuck. How can something this awful be a bestseller? But now I've at least satisfied my curiosity about how Harkness wrapped everything up (not satisfactorily), so let the shredding begin.
The Book of Life begins where Shadow of Night ends. Matthew the vampire and Diana the witch return to Sept-Tours, the de Clermont ancestral home. She is pregnant with twins and they are married, two facts they would like to keep from the Congregation. Aunt Emily is dead and even though we (the readers) learned of her death in the previous book, Harkness didn’t explain what happened until now. Emily supposedly died of a heart attack when two other witches were questioning her about spells she was casting. Matthew and Diana don’t believe this and vow to discover the truth. They also have to deal with Matthew’s blood rage, find missing pages torn from the Ashmole 782 manuscript (aka The Book of Life) in order to retrieve the whole manuscript from the Bodleian Library, confront the Congregation and stop Benjamin, Matthew’s very bad son, from doing more very bad things.
Many—way too many—things happen in this book. In order to keep this review under a million words, I’m going to hit the highlights of Things That Made Me Roll My Eyes. First, however, I’ll start with what I liked. It’s a very short list: 1) Continuity. Considering how stuffed all these books are with details about everything, Harkness does an amazing job of connecting actions, people, and places from the last two books with this one. In chapter three, Diana is surprised to find a book she used in the 16th century to practice her handwriting still around in modern day Sept-Tours. I laughed because I remember that scene well from the second book only because it was so damn boring—a very long passage describing her efforts to write the 16th century way. I thought that scene was stupid in the second book and I think it’s stupid to bring it up in the third book, but wow—gold star for continuity. 2) The Bishop family house. The house is the best character in the books and I am disappointed it makes only a brief appearance in this book. For a short while, Matthew and Diana and their band of merry followers stay at the house. It’s playing Fleetwood Mac records nonstop. Even though I don’t like any of these vampires or witches, they have my sympathy here. Fleetwood Mac sucks. 3) Harkness’s writing seems to have improved between books two and three. While I still find this book deplorable, it actually keeps my attention. That’s fairly amazing considering how dumb and scatterbrained it is. Oh, and the artwork for the book cover is pretty. There’s that.
Now I can bitch. There are too many unnecessary details. About everything. We have specific descriptions of the characters’ voices; Fernando (who is a gay vampire but Harkness has so little imagination his character is stereotypically gay down to his fussiness and talented cooking) has a voice “as warm and cultured as sherry aged in oak barrels” (6). We know what all the characters smell like. In chapter 7, there’s a detailed list of all the kitchen appliances and their uses. Diana also goes grocery shopping and meets up with some fellow witches. The whole scene is unnecessary, but it's this sentence that makes me crazy: “I fumbled and nearly dropped the paper bag of apples grown on a nearby farm” (105). It’s the “grown on a nearby farm” that makes me incoherent with rage. Who gives a shit? Is it really that important to know that Diana, as well as being so awesome in every other aspect, is also concerned about buying local produce? WHAT THE FUCK, EDITOR. Idiotic shit like this is why the book is so damn long. There are many pages devoted to the scientific analysis of Matthew’s DNA, Diana’s DNA, the DNA of one of the Ashmole pages…who cares? Very little of it is actually relevant to the plot (whatever the hell the plot is).
One of the dumbest parts of the book is the trip to the Bodleian library to steal the Ashmole manuscript. The whole heist is asinine. I’m already annoyed by this sentence: “It was every library patron’s nightmare—that you were secretly being observed whenever you took a forbidden cough drop out of your pocket” (458). As a staff person at a library and a library patron, I wonder: what the fuck is she talking about? Shove a million cough drops into your mouth—we don’t care. However, we do care about sugary, sticky drinks and gooey, greasy pizza. But no one should care because cough drops have nothing to do with the heist. Diana and her helpers (it takes three witches, two vampires and one firedrake to steal this damn manuscript) go to the Bodleian Library. After deactivating all the magical surveillance by using magic, Diana puts a halt to their illegal activities to call her sweetie pie. Getting this manuscript is supposedly the most important mission they have, but dumb ass has to call pookie-kins to let him know she’s okay. Major fucking eye roll here. Not only that, but if their souls are so magically in sync, shouldn’t he just know she’s fine? Whatever. Now, even though the library is closed because of the Christmas holidays and they know that the pneumatic tube book request system is shut down, Diana and her crew of morons decide to fill out a book slip requesting the Ashmole manuscript and send it via tube. Now, I’m guessing that if you’re going to steal a book from a library, you don’t fucking submit a written request for that actual book. That’s like handing the bank teller your ATM card and then saying, “This is a stick-up. Give me money.” Wtf, Diana. But this isn’t the best (or worst) part. The dumb fucks stand around waiting for two hours! for the damn manuscript to appear in front of them. What the fuck! Wtf???? That makes no sense. Why the hell would you have your characters do that, Harkness? What the hell is the point of that? Do you not understand pacing? So your characters stand around for two hours doing what? Playing hopscotch? Magical orgy? What? Finally, they decide the library is not going to send them the manuscript so Diana says, oh yeah, I’m a witch. Time to do magical shit. (If you’re a witch, wouldn’t starting with magical shit be your first move?) Eventually she does some magical shit and with the help of Corra, her unfortunately-named firedrake, she finds the fucking manuscript.
During all of this, the five jackasses are joking around and giggling. That’s one of the weirder aspects of this book—everything is supposed to be all so dramatic and serious, but then Harkness sticks in these loony scenes with the characters tee-heeing and yee-hawing about the stupidest shit. (Also, in chapter five, the vampires greet each other with waves and cheerful calls of “Hi!” I want to stake them all.) It’s another moment of bemusement at how weirdly out of place these scenes are; not only that, but the humor is not funny.
What is funny is all the secrets that aren’t secrets. Humans aren’t supposed to know about daemons, witches and vampires. They know. Even if they didn’t know, Matthew and Diana are the worst fucking blabber mouths around. They are constantly telling people: oh yeah, I’m a vampire/witch. What’s even more amusing is that as soon as one of them blabs, the human shrugs and says, effectively, “So what?” When Chris, Diana’s human colleague from her university, shows up, she calmly informs him that her husband is a vampire—that’s why he has such great hearing. Chris’s only argument that Matthew can’t be a vampire is because on the tv show Buffy the Vampire Slayer, girls who have sex with vampires never get “knocked up,” but Diana is pregnant. This dubious logic is followed by Chris stating the reason he is so calm about hearing this is “I’m a scientist. I’m trained to suspend disbelief and remain open-minded until something is disproved” (162). Yeah, I don’t think Chris (or Harkness) has even the most basic understanding of scientific thinking. If his statement were correct, we’d still be back in the Dark Ages. If he really were a scientist, he’d ask her what proof she has that Matthew is a vampire (and that she’s not nuts). There’s a great (in a bad way) scene in which Matthew outs not only himself, but all supernatural creatures, to his Yale research students. They are working on his DNA analysis. There are a lot of lame jokes (students theorize that the DNA belongs to aliens and two of the students’ nicknames are “Mulder” and “Scully”—oh, tee hee, Harkness. Stop now before I wet myself) but finally Matthew says: “No, I’m a vampire. And before you ask, I can go outside during the day and my hair won’t catch fire in the sunlight. I’m Catholic and have a crucifix. When I sleep, which is not often, I prefer a bed to a coffin. If you try to stake me, the wood will likely splinter before it enters my skin. No fangs either. And one last thing: I do not, nor have I ever, sparkled” (196). The students’ reaction: “Whoa, dude. How old are you? Over 1,500 years! Awesome, dude! High-five!” None of these so-called scientists says, “Um, yeah, right. Call campus security.” No one in the book (humans) ever responds with skepticism or laughter when told about these supernatural beings. Why is that? Well, Harkness does write stupid books about stupid people, but also: almost everyone in the book is a fucking supernatural being! I can think of only three humans in the book. That’s it. So…what’s the secret? Diana and Matthew also blab about their marriage (relations between supernatural creatures is forbidden by the Congregation) and her pregnancy (forbidden). When the Congregation sends them a note saying, hey, naughty naughty, you two are married and produced children, the two dumb fucks can't figure it out: “How’d they know? Who told the Congregation?” Um…everyone knows. You two are the Brangelina of this idiot trilogy. Same thing with Benji, Matthew’s evil son. He was erased from the family tree and was supposed to be a deep, dark secret…guess what? Everyone fucking knows.
The Marty Stu/Mary Sue factor. Diana and Matthew are too perfect to be believable. Diana is the Best Witch Ever. She is the Most Beautiful Woman Ever. Everyone Loves Her (even Gallowglass reveals that his love for “auntie” is of the carnal variety). Everyone wants to help her. In one scene, we learn that Diana’s awesome witch skills of the 16th century so inspired the London witches that they created a sort of shrine to her and she is now a legend. It’s ridiculous. The same is true for Matthew. He’s a very accomplished vampire. Granted, he’s over a thousand years old, but c’mon. This is the list Diana compiles: scientist, warrior, spy, prince, assassin. The list doesn’t include his musical talent and woodworking skills. And, according to the last book, he's also an architect. He’s even so awesome that he can master his blood rage. This awesomeness extends to vampires in general and to the de Clermont family in particular. They are the oldest, the most impressive, the most influential…yes, they are the best fucking vampires ever. We get it. And when you have the best fucking vampire ever joining forces with the best fucking witch ever, you’ve immediately lost any kind of tension or suspense in the story. There’s very little doubt as to the outcome. Will the Dynamic Duo (along with their adoring entourage) triumph over all the obstacles in their path? Of course. They can’t fail. They’re too perfect. And the obstacles aren't all that difficult.
What’s also perfect is their passionate marital bond. Take notice, all married people: Diana and Matthew are the perfect soulmates. We are repeatedly hammered over the head with the message that yes, they really do love each other. These are a few quotes that grossed me out the most:
Page 15: (after hearing of Emily’s death): “Gallowglass left Matthew and Diana twined together in an unbreakable knot, their faces twisted with pain and sorrow, each giving the other the comfort they could not find for themselves.”
Page 30: “Here, within the circle of his arms, was all that he had ever wanted. A wife. Children. A family of his own.” (A secure job in the family business. Two weeks of paid vacation every year. A lovely home with a white picket fence and one cat, one dog, and a fire drake. Awww. Such sweet, sweet dreams…for a vampire.)
Page 118: “His wife—his heart, his mate, his life—stepped down off the porch and into his arms. Diana’s eyes were the blue and gold of a summer sky, and Matthew wanted nothing more than to fall headlong into their bright depths, not to lose himself but to be found.” Yes, we get it. Rainbows and unicorns and hearts full of love. Of course, since he’s a vamp and she’s a witch, she’s going to age. He won’t. Will their passion still burn so brightly when she’s 60 and wrinkled? Or will he make her a vamp so he has centuries to be possessive and creepy? Whatever their future holds, I’m sure it will be perfect and shiny.
This is a fucked-up mess of a book. Viking, the publisher, apparently does not employ editors. All the other crap aside, it’s basically a dressed-up romance novel. A very conservative romance novel. The supernatural creatures aren’t very supernatural. The vampires are stripped of nearly everything that makes a vampire—and stripped of everything that makes them scary. They are fang-less on many levels. Matthew is a pious Catholic who says things like, “I leave that in the hands of God.” He drinks wine, eats food, and wears a cross. He’s about as scary as a paper cut. These vampires also breathe and have hearts that beats and circulate blood—so why does Diana constantly refer to Matthew’s cold body? Matthew is a fine, upstanding man who just wants a family and to be the CEO of his own dynasty. Diana is a powerful witch, but she’s reluctant to use her powers, even for good. She gladly submits to her husband because that’s what good little wives do. They didn’t even have sex until after their marriage (which very properly produced children). This novel is full of happy domestic scenes. Chapter 33 is all about Christmas. It’s so delightful: “The babies’ first Christmas was as loving and festive as anyone could wish” (449). Oh, goody. It’s as if Harkness is starting a new genre: The “Cozy” Vampire: He Just Wants To Be Loved. Where’s Buffy when you need her?
PS:
No mention of the stretchy black pants! I was so disappointed. Diana's pregnant with twins. Isn't this the perfect time for stretchy black pants?
Matthew gets Diana a six-slice toaster for Christmas. Holy shit. Yup, that's what she wanted and boy was she excited to get it. She used her oh-so-powerful magical skills to turn six (yes, only 6) strands of his hair gray. He's delighted and shows everyone at the big family vampire Christmas gathering. OMG. Could they be any more lame?
ALERT: All Souls Trilogy lovers and haters--BBC is adapting these shitty books for tv. I pity the screenwriter whose job it is to pull a half-way intelligent story from these books. Will I watch it when it airs? Oh, hell yeah.
NEW COMMENT: I have now visited and toured the Bodleian Library of Oxford (as of October 2017). Now that I've been inside (it's not just one big library as I thought), I want to reread parts of the books that deal with the library. I learned that the pneumatic tube note system has been discontinued for quite some time, so if Diana was sending a request via it, it never would have gone anywhere. Personally, I think she was too dumb to study at Oxford and be allowed to use the library.
The Book of Life begins where Shadow of Night ends. Matthew the vampire and Diana the witch return to Sept-Tours, the de Clermont ancestral home. She is pregnant with twins and they are married, two facts they would like to keep from the Congregation. Aunt Emily is dead and even though we (the readers) learned of her death in the previous book, Harkness didn’t explain what happened until now. Emily supposedly died of a heart attack when two other witches were questioning her about spells she was casting. Matthew and Diana don’t believe this and vow to discover the truth. They also have to deal with Matthew’s blood rage, find missing pages torn from the Ashmole 782 manuscript (aka The Book of Life) in order to retrieve the whole manuscript from the Bodleian Library, confront the Congregation and stop Benjamin, Matthew’s very bad son, from doing more very bad things.
Many—way too many—things happen in this book. In order to keep this review under a million words, I’m going to hit the highlights of Things That Made Me Roll My Eyes. First, however, I’ll start with what I liked. It’s a very short list: 1) Continuity. Considering how stuffed all these books are with details about everything, Harkness does an amazing job of connecting actions, people, and places from the last two books with this one. In chapter three, Diana is surprised to find a book she used in the 16th century to practice her handwriting still around in modern day Sept-Tours. I laughed because I remember that scene well from the second book only because it was so damn boring—a very long passage describing her efforts to write the 16th century way. I thought that scene was stupid in the second book and I think it’s stupid to bring it up in the third book, but wow—gold star for continuity. 2) The Bishop family house. The house is the best character in the books and I am disappointed it makes only a brief appearance in this book. For a short while, Matthew and Diana and their band of merry followers stay at the house. It’s playing Fleetwood Mac records nonstop. Even though I don’t like any of these vampires or witches, they have my sympathy here. Fleetwood Mac sucks. 3) Harkness’s writing seems to have improved between books two and three. While I still find this book deplorable, it actually keeps my attention. That’s fairly amazing considering how dumb and scatterbrained it is. Oh, and the artwork for the book cover is pretty. There’s that.
Now I can bitch. There are too many unnecessary details. About everything. We have specific descriptions of the characters’ voices; Fernando (who is a gay vampire but Harkness has so little imagination his character is stereotypically gay down to his fussiness and talented cooking) has a voice “as warm and cultured as sherry aged in oak barrels” (6). We know what all the characters smell like. In chapter 7, there’s a detailed list of all the kitchen appliances and their uses. Diana also goes grocery shopping and meets up with some fellow witches. The whole scene is unnecessary, but it's this sentence that makes me crazy: “I fumbled and nearly dropped the paper bag of apples grown on a nearby farm” (105). It’s the “grown on a nearby farm” that makes me incoherent with rage. Who gives a shit? Is it really that important to know that Diana, as well as being so awesome in every other aspect, is also concerned about buying local produce? WHAT THE FUCK, EDITOR. Idiotic shit like this is why the book is so damn long. There are many pages devoted to the scientific analysis of Matthew’s DNA, Diana’s DNA, the DNA of one of the Ashmole pages…who cares? Very little of it is actually relevant to the plot (whatever the hell the plot is).
One of the dumbest parts of the book is the trip to the Bodleian library to steal the Ashmole manuscript. The whole heist is asinine. I’m already annoyed by this sentence: “It was every library patron’s nightmare—that you were secretly being observed whenever you took a forbidden cough drop out of your pocket” (458). As a staff person at a library and a library patron, I wonder: what the fuck is she talking about? Shove a million cough drops into your mouth—we don’t care. However, we do care about sugary, sticky drinks and gooey, greasy pizza. But no one should care because cough drops have nothing to do with the heist. Diana and her helpers (it takes three witches, two vampires and one firedrake to steal this damn manuscript) go to the Bodleian Library. After deactivating all the magical surveillance by using magic, Diana puts a halt to their illegal activities to call her sweetie pie. Getting this manuscript is supposedly the most important mission they have, but dumb ass has to call pookie-kins to let him know she’s okay. Major fucking eye roll here. Not only that, but if their souls are so magically in sync, shouldn’t he just know she’s fine? Whatever. Now, even though the library is closed because of the Christmas holidays and they know that the pneumatic tube book request system is shut down, Diana and her crew of morons decide to fill out a book slip requesting the Ashmole manuscript and send it via tube. Now, I’m guessing that if you’re going to steal a book from a library, you don’t fucking submit a written request for that actual book. That’s like handing the bank teller your ATM card and then saying, “This is a stick-up. Give me money.” Wtf, Diana. But this isn’t the best (or worst) part. The dumb fucks stand around waiting for two hours! for the damn manuscript to appear in front of them. What the fuck! Wtf???? That makes no sense. Why the hell would you have your characters do that, Harkness? What the hell is the point of that? Do you not understand pacing? So your characters stand around for two hours doing what? Playing hopscotch? Magical orgy? What? Finally, they decide the library is not going to send them the manuscript so Diana says, oh yeah, I’m a witch. Time to do magical shit. (If you’re a witch, wouldn’t starting with magical shit be your first move?) Eventually she does some magical shit and with the help of Corra, her unfortunately-named firedrake, she finds the fucking manuscript.
During all of this, the five jackasses are joking around and giggling. That’s one of the weirder aspects of this book—everything is supposed to be all so dramatic and serious, but then Harkness sticks in these loony scenes with the characters tee-heeing and yee-hawing about the stupidest shit. (Also, in chapter five, the vampires greet each other with waves and cheerful calls of “Hi!” I want to stake them all.) It’s another moment of bemusement at how weirdly out of place these scenes are; not only that, but the humor is not funny.
What is funny is all the secrets that aren’t secrets. Humans aren’t supposed to know about daemons, witches and vampires. They know. Even if they didn’t know, Matthew and Diana are the worst fucking blabber mouths around. They are constantly telling people: oh yeah, I’m a vampire/witch. What’s even more amusing is that as soon as one of them blabs, the human shrugs and says, effectively, “So what?” When Chris, Diana’s human colleague from her university, shows up, she calmly informs him that her husband is a vampire—that’s why he has such great hearing. Chris’s only argument that Matthew can’t be a vampire is because on the tv show Buffy the Vampire Slayer, girls who have sex with vampires never get “knocked up,” but Diana is pregnant. This dubious logic is followed by Chris stating the reason he is so calm about hearing this is “I’m a scientist. I’m trained to suspend disbelief and remain open-minded until something is disproved” (162). Yeah, I don’t think Chris (or Harkness) has even the most basic understanding of scientific thinking. If his statement were correct, we’d still be back in the Dark Ages. If he really were a scientist, he’d ask her what proof she has that Matthew is a vampire (and that she’s not nuts). There’s a great (in a bad way) scene in which Matthew outs not only himself, but all supernatural creatures, to his Yale research students. They are working on his DNA analysis. There are a lot of lame jokes (students theorize that the DNA belongs to aliens and two of the students’ nicknames are “Mulder” and “Scully”—oh, tee hee, Harkness. Stop now before I wet myself) but finally Matthew says: “No, I’m a vampire. And before you ask, I can go outside during the day and my hair won’t catch fire in the sunlight. I’m Catholic and have a crucifix. When I sleep, which is not often, I prefer a bed to a coffin. If you try to stake me, the wood will likely splinter before it enters my skin. No fangs either. And one last thing: I do not, nor have I ever, sparkled” (196). The students’ reaction: “Whoa, dude. How old are you? Over 1,500 years! Awesome, dude! High-five!” None of these so-called scientists says, “Um, yeah, right. Call campus security.” No one in the book (humans) ever responds with skepticism or laughter when told about these supernatural beings. Why is that? Well, Harkness does write stupid books about stupid people, but also: almost everyone in the book is a fucking supernatural being! I can think of only three humans in the book. That’s it. So…what’s the secret? Diana and Matthew also blab about their marriage (relations between supernatural creatures is forbidden by the Congregation) and her pregnancy (forbidden). When the Congregation sends them a note saying, hey, naughty naughty, you two are married and produced children, the two dumb fucks can't figure it out: “How’d they know? Who told the Congregation?” Um…everyone knows. You two are the Brangelina of this idiot trilogy. Same thing with Benji, Matthew’s evil son. He was erased from the family tree and was supposed to be a deep, dark secret…guess what? Everyone fucking knows.
The Marty Stu/Mary Sue factor. Diana and Matthew are too perfect to be believable. Diana is the Best Witch Ever. She is the Most Beautiful Woman Ever. Everyone Loves Her (even Gallowglass reveals that his love for “auntie” is of the carnal variety). Everyone wants to help her. In one scene, we learn that Diana’s awesome witch skills of the 16th century so inspired the London witches that they created a sort of shrine to her and she is now a legend. It’s ridiculous. The same is true for Matthew. He’s a very accomplished vampire. Granted, he’s over a thousand years old, but c’mon. This is the list Diana compiles: scientist, warrior, spy, prince, assassin. The list doesn’t include his musical talent and woodworking skills. And, according to the last book, he's also an architect. He’s even so awesome that he can master his blood rage. This awesomeness extends to vampires in general and to the de Clermont family in particular. They are the oldest, the most impressive, the most influential…yes, they are the best fucking vampires ever. We get it. And when you have the best fucking vampire ever joining forces with the best fucking witch ever, you’ve immediately lost any kind of tension or suspense in the story. There’s very little doubt as to the outcome. Will the Dynamic Duo (along with their adoring entourage) triumph over all the obstacles in their path? Of course. They can’t fail. They’re too perfect. And the obstacles aren't all that difficult.
What’s also perfect is their passionate marital bond. Take notice, all married people: Diana and Matthew are the perfect soulmates. We are repeatedly hammered over the head with the message that yes, they really do love each other. These are a few quotes that grossed me out the most:
Page 15: (after hearing of Emily’s death): “Gallowglass left Matthew and Diana twined together in an unbreakable knot, their faces twisted with pain and sorrow, each giving the other the comfort they could not find for themselves.”
Page 30: “Here, within the circle of his arms, was all that he had ever wanted. A wife. Children. A family of his own.” (A secure job in the family business. Two weeks of paid vacation every year. A lovely home with a white picket fence and one cat, one dog, and a fire drake. Awww. Such sweet, sweet dreams…for a vampire.)
Page 118: “His wife—his heart, his mate, his life—stepped down off the porch and into his arms. Diana’s eyes were the blue and gold of a summer sky, and Matthew wanted nothing more than to fall headlong into their bright depths, not to lose himself but to be found.” Yes, we get it. Rainbows and unicorns and hearts full of love. Of course, since he’s a vamp and she’s a witch, she’s going to age. He won’t. Will their passion still burn so brightly when she’s 60 and wrinkled? Or will he make her a vamp so he has centuries to be possessive and creepy? Whatever their future holds, I’m sure it will be perfect and shiny.
This is a fucked-up mess of a book. Viking, the publisher, apparently does not employ editors. All the other crap aside, it’s basically a dressed-up romance novel. A very conservative romance novel. The supernatural creatures aren’t very supernatural. The vampires are stripped of nearly everything that makes a vampire—and stripped of everything that makes them scary. They are fang-less on many levels. Matthew is a pious Catholic who says things like, “I leave that in the hands of God.” He drinks wine, eats food, and wears a cross. He’s about as scary as a paper cut. These vampires also breathe and have hearts that beats and circulate blood—so why does Diana constantly refer to Matthew’s cold body? Matthew is a fine, upstanding man who just wants a family and to be the CEO of his own dynasty. Diana is a powerful witch, but she’s reluctant to use her powers, even for good. She gladly submits to her husband because that’s what good little wives do. They didn’t even have sex until after their marriage (which very properly produced children). This novel is full of happy domestic scenes. Chapter 33 is all about Christmas. It’s so delightful: “The babies’ first Christmas was as loving and festive as anyone could wish” (449). Oh, goody. It’s as if Harkness is starting a new genre: The “Cozy” Vampire: He Just Wants To Be Loved. Where’s Buffy when you need her?
PS:
No mention of the stretchy black pants! I was so disappointed. Diana's pregnant with twins. Isn't this the perfect time for stretchy black pants?
Matthew gets Diana a six-slice toaster for Christmas. Holy shit. Yup, that's what she wanted and boy was she excited to get it. She used her oh-so-powerful magical skills to turn six (yes, only 6) strands of his hair gray. He's delighted and shows everyone at the big family vampire Christmas gathering. OMG. Could they be any more lame?
ALERT: All Souls Trilogy lovers and haters--BBC is adapting these shitty books for tv. I pity the screenwriter whose job it is to pull a half-way intelligent story from these books. Will I watch it when it airs? Oh, hell yeah.
NEW COMMENT: I have now visited and toured the Bodleian Library of Oxford (as of October 2017). Now that I've been inside (it's not just one big library as I thought), I want to reread parts of the books that deal with the library. I learned that the pneumatic tube note system has been discontinued for quite some time, so if Diana was sending a request via it, it never would have gone anywhere. Personally, I think she was too dumb to study at Oxford and be allowed to use the library.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
The Book of Life.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
June 2, 2014
– Shelved
June 2, 2014
– Shelved as:
to-read
December 23, 2014
–
Started Reading
December 23, 2014
– Shelved as:
fiction
December 23, 2014
– Shelved as:
supernatural-creatures
December 23, 2014
–
6.06%
"I'm traveling into this book fully aware that it sucks ass. I read the first sentence and texted a friend: "Hate it already." However, it is the last in a trilogy, the writing is silly, and it's been a while since I've had the chance to write a nasty review. So woo hoo! Full speed ahead."
page
34
December 23, 2014
–
17.29%
"I'm baffled how anyone can enjoy this book. I can't even compliment it with being bad enough to piss me off. It's simply boring. This is the most boring collection of witches, demons, and vampires to ever assemble in such a long, boring book. Next up--Matthew does science!"
page
97
December 25, 2014
–
36.19%
"This is the most unfocused book ever. A decent editor could have pulled at least one good book from this mess. If I wanted to a) become a witch or b) study genetics, I'd be well on my way with the excess of details about both. I feel like I'm reading the author's first draft. It's all over the place. And when the hell are vampires Catholics? WTF! So stupid."
page
203
December 27, 2014
–
81.28%
"Okay. What's worse than a vampire doing yoga? Imagine this: a vampire carrying a diaper bag. Oh yeah."
page
456
December 27, 2014
–
87.17%
"This is the dumbest collection of witches and vampires ever. A 5 yr old could steal a book more successfully than this idiot Diana the super witch. This has to be the worst book I've read all year."
page
489
December 30, 2014
–
Finished Reading
January 5, 2015
–
87.17%
"I finished this idiot book Dec. 30. In process of writing review."
page
489
January 5, 2015
– Shelved as:
library-book
January 5, 2015
– Shelved as:
omg-this-book-is-so-dumb
January 5, 2015
– Shelved as:
wtf
Comments Showing 1-50 of 193 (193 new)
message 1:
by
Kristina
(new)
-
rated it 1 star
Jun 02, 2014 05:34AM
Well, I don't really want to read this. I just feel compelled to. I need to finish my trilogy of mean reviews. I won't buy it though.
reply
|
flag
*
So much win in this review especially about M/D's domestic bliss and Diane being a good little wifey. Ugh.Also LOL at It’s as if Harkness is starting a new genre: The “Cozy” Vampire: He Just Wants To Be Loved. I think most YA vampires are written like that too, it's such pathetic writing and storytelling.
Loved the review btw :)
Ferdy wrote: "So much win in this review especially about M/D's domestic bliss and Diane being a good little wifey. Ugh.Also LOL at It’s as if Harkness is starting a new genre: The “Cozy” Vampire: He Just Want..."
Thank you. It took me forever to write this review because EVERYTHING about the book is wrong. EVERYTHING. I rewrote it 3 times just to make it coherent (the first attempt was basically: "What the fuck! This book is fucking stupid! Ah, fuck!") and not too long. I probably put more effort into the review than Harkness did writing the damn book. Or, at the very least, I was more concerned about my review making sense...because this book is complete nonsense.
I could write a paper on the underlying themes of this book. Strip away all the vamp and witch BS, and it's a very conservative book about how women should behave. Particularly married women. There are a few chapters about how Diana, now that she's a de Clermont and married to a vamp, must behave in a certain way to uphold the "dignity" of her position. That is--behave like a second class citizen, obey her husband at all time, tell no one family business, do only what her husband allows her to do, etc. It was ridiculous. It was almost like she joined a fundamentalist religion/cult. And Matthew is a possessive psycho who follows her around all the time and has temper tantrums when he can't be with her. It's like...wtf! But Diana is like, oh, but he wuvs me so much and I wuv him so I'll be a good little wifey. And give birth as many times as he wants. But she's still "independent" because she kept her maiden name and will keep her career as a college professor...because he lets her. Wtf. So much wrong with this book....so much.
Awesome review. No doubt a better read than the book itself. You had me at "fumbled a bag of apples grown at a nearby farm." I think you pegged it with your Mary Sue/Marty Stu comments. When main characters are this perfect they become perfectly dull. Add a ridiculous plot and a lack of good editors brave enough to say enough already and you end up with....a pretty cover.
Elvan wrote: "Awesome review. No doubt a better read than the book itself. You had me at "fumbled a bag of apples grown at a nearby farm." I think you pegged it with your Mary Sue/Marty Stu comments. When main..."
Thank you. Yes. The "fumbled a bag of apples" sentence pretty much sums up the whole idiotic book AND highlights the absolute lack of editing. I read a lot of author interviews and the "art of writing" type of stuff and the writers always talk about how much editing they do--how they have to strip down their books to get rid of unnecessary verbiage. And if you read any books about writing, you'll get that message too. Then big publishers--with the money to pay for good editors--publish crap ass novels like this and they are best-sellers!!!! Ugh. It's just so ridiculous how low the publishing standards are anymore. I'm toying with idea of writing a letter to Viking to ask if anyone edited this novel it all. It's such a freaking mess. Really, the pretty book cover is the best part.
Great review Kristina, very thorough. :) I'm so glad I didn't carry on after the first book now!! I always wondered whether I should have, but it doesn't sound like any of the issues from that first one were addressed in the later instalments.
Mizuki wrote: "It's a trilogy about fang-less non-threatening vampires? I am going to stay far, far away!"Oh yeah. The author completely stripped the vamps of their sense of danger and literally, they have no fangs. Apparently Matthew (the super awesome hero vamp) is only allowed to kill to get rid of "bad" vamps...and even the bad vamps (in this book it's Benji, Matthew's son) are not all that shocking. Matthew slurps wine, enjoys a good yoga pose, and carries a diaper bag. Stay far away from this book!
Borderstar wrote: "Great review Kristina, very thorough. :) I'm so glad I didn't carry on after the first book now!! I always wondered whether I should have, but it doesn't sound like any of the issues from that fi..."Thank you. Were the issues addressed? Depends on what issues you mean...there are so many! But no matter because the issues were solved so...unsatisfactorily. It's like...I read 561 pages for this?!
Kristina wrote: "The author completely stripped the vamps of their sense of danger and literally, they have no fangs. Apparently Matthew (the super awesome hero vamp) is only allowed to kill to get rid of "bad" vamps...HELL. TO. THE. NO. then! I'm so sick of this "good vampires vs bad vampires" and "good vampires have feeling too..." BS!
And it's not even a YA, it's a book for adults...right?
and even the bad vamps (in this book it's Benji, Matthew's son) are not all that shocking."
ARGHHH!!! If they aren't evil then what's the point of making them vampires at the first place!?
Mizuki wrote: "Kristina wrote: "The author completely stripped the vamps of their sense of danger and literally, they have no fangs. Apparently Matthew (the super awesome hero vamp) is only allowed to kill to get..."Ha ha ha ha ha...yeah, that's my reaction too. I get the sense that the author wanted to write a basic happy romance but made the characters vamps and witches so it would fit in with the (still hot) vamp trend. Matthew (the main character) is so lovey dovey for his woman. And he's a pious Catholic. Plus he's the head of an organization called the Lazarus Order (I think that's what it's called but I could be wrong) which is "good" vamps doing all sorts of "good" works. It's like...really? It's all rather lame.
Yes, this is a book for adults. I say it's a book only for people with bad taste.
Edit: It's the Knights of Lazarus. They are a bunch of helpful, kind vamps who have helped people (assuming this is supernatural people) over the centuries. Ummmm....yeah. Vamps as do-gooders? No. I don't buy it.
Kristina wrote: "Matthew (the main character) is so lovey dovey for his woman. And he's a pious Catholic. Plus he's the head of an organization called the Lazarus Order (I think that's what it's called but I could be wrong) which is "good" vamps doing all sorts of "good" works. It's like...really? It's all rather lame."Fuck. This. Shit! I'd rather go back to read those Victorian vampire novellas....in which vampires are monsters!
Mizuki wrote: "Kristina wrote: "Matthew (the main character) is so lovey dovey for his woman. And he's a pious Catholic. Plus he's the head of an organization called the Lazarus Order (I think that's what it's ca..."Yeah, me too. I got so disgusted with this one that I stopped in the middle of it to read the first book of the Sookie Stackhouse series again. Those books are a bit dopey too, but at least the vampires are sexy, dangerous and like to suck blood. It was a refreshing change from the useless vamps in this novel.
Kristina wrote: " Those books are a bit dopey too, but at least the vampires are sexy, dangerous and like to suck blood. It was a refreshing change from the useless vamps in this novel. "I know right? The first handful books of the Sookie Stackhouse series are good, but the rest....I just gave up.
Mizuki wrote: "Kristina wrote: " Those books are a bit dopey too, but at least the vampires are sexy, dangerous and like to suck blood. It was a refreshing change from the useless vamps in this novel. "I know r..."
Agreed. Somewhere around Dead in the Family I lost interest. I read the last one just to see how the series would end (dumb, as I expected).
Kristina wrote: "Agreed. Somewhere around Dead in the Family I lost interest. I read the last one just to see how the series would end (dumb, as I expected). "I don't even make it to Dead in the Family, the downfall of the Sookie Stackhouse series lays in the murder mysteries taking the backseat, whilst the series becomes burdened by Sookie screwing this or that supernatural guy. =__=
Mizuki wrote: "Kristina wrote: "Agreed. Somewhere around Dead in the Family I lost interest. I read the last one just to see how the series would end (dumb, as I expected). "I don't even make it to Dead in the ..."
All the fairy stuff did me in. And yes, Sookie's romances got tedious. I think the author just got really tired of writing the series. I read her Goodreads interview and she says that she was glad the contract ended when it did because she was running out of ideas...but what she didn't say was she ran out of ideas (and interest in the characters) 5 books ago. You can almost pinpoint in what book that happens (the one before Dead in the Family).
Kristina wrote: "I read her Goodreads interview and she says that she was glad the contract ended when it did because she was running out of ideas...but what she didn't say was she ran out of ideas (and interest in the characters) 5 books ago. "Oh yes this fey business is just damn icky! It makes Sookie looks like a Mary Sue.
Now it all makes sense! I should feel happy for her to escape from the contract hell...
I like her other series, which is stated by Grave Sight...can't recall the title of this series but I like almost each book, it's good that it ends with four or five books only. ^_^
Thank you SO. MUCH. for this review, I just finished the first book and was also thinking along the lines of, "what the fuck did I just read?" I hate stopping in the middle of books and even in the middle of series, but it was just so goddamn awful I really thought I might. But now I know how it turns out (and that it's exactly how I figured it would be) with a free conscious, I can firmly decide to forget that this series even exists. Cheers.Ps. Everything you said, but also what the fuck is up with Tweedledums relationship with her aunts? They've known her her whole life but suddenly Tweedledee comes along and back up bitches, she's reverting to full on teen angst mode and he's the expert on that hot piece of scarecrow. Also: The contrived representation. Gotta make sure everyone knows how gay that daemon is so I can target that crowd...gotta spend 3 pages describing this black person w/o actually saying it to bump up my street cred as an "inclusive author" Jesus Christ on a cracker... who is this woman's editor?!??!
Okay. Use of the word "mate". I'm throwing up.I feel like "WHAT THE FUCK, EDITORS" should be a tag. I might borrow it.
And now I bet what you want that there will be a 4, or a 2.5 book, with Matthew's POV, or whatvs. I feel it coming.
Again, thank you for your suffering and review. Didn't read the book obviously but felt like it nailed it.
Hiroto wrote: "Okay. Use of the word "mate". I'm throwing up.I feel like "WHAT THE FUCK, EDITORS" should be a tag. I might borrow it.
And now I bet what you want that there will be a 4, or a 2.5 book, with Matt..."
Don't throw up on your computer. What a mess.
Go ahead and borrow WHAT THE FUCK, EDITORS. It should be used for a lot of books that are poorly edited.
My response to any other books featuring these idiots: HELL NO. I will not read them. I've suffered enough!
You're welcome. Writing reviews is fun and I always appreciate comments, even people who disagree with me (what a crazy idea!).
Regan wrote: "Thank you SO. MUCH. for this review, I just finished the first book and was also thinking along the lines of, "what the fuck did I just read?" I hate stopping in the middle of books and even in the..."I'm glad my review eased your conscious. I hate to end books midway too, but sometimes you just have to do it because they suck so much.
I've read your second paragraph a few times and I'm apparently dense because I don't understand the Tweedledum/Tweedledee and the "hot piece of scarecrow" comments. I probably agree with you, but if you explain it for me, I'll comment more.
As for her trying to be an "inclusive author" yeah, that was annoying. It's like she checked off a list: gay character--check. Black man--check. Lesbians--check. Harkness is not a talented writer and her attempt at inclusion seemed forced. Personally, I don't think the woman had an editor. That's always been my problem with these books--the incredibly bad editing. I kept screaming at this book: What the fuck, editor! What the fuck! So yeah...I'm a bit nuts.
Mizuki wrote: "Kristina:I'm reading A Discovery of Witches, and I'm sure I'll DNF soon..."
:) Stop before you damage the book (or your electronic device if it's an e-book). It starts out with an intriguing premise, but soon descends into chaos and the reader muttering "wtf?!" under her breath.
Kristina wrote: "Mizuki wrote: "Kristina:I'm reading A Discovery of Witches, and I'm sure I'll DNF soon..."
:) Stop before you damage the book (or your electronic device if it's an e-book). It starts out with an..."
Well...if the author talks once more about what the MC has for dinner and if she wrote one more of the MC's trip to the fucking library (and I swear I love libraries), I will throw the book away!
Mizuki wrote: "Kristina wrote: "Mizuki wrote: "Kristina:I'm reading A Discovery of Witches, and I'm sure I'll DNF soon..."
:) Stop before you damage the book (or your electronic device if it's an e-book). It s..."
She talks a lot about how much tea she drinks. And her stretchy black pants. Did you get to the vampires doing yoga yet?
Kristina wrote: " Did you get to the vampires doing yoga yet? "Yes she did! I can never believe vampires can become so silly! It's even worse than the vampire-baseball in Twilight~
Mizuki wrote: "Kristina wrote: " Did you get to the vampires doing yoga yet? "Yes she did! I can never believe vampires can become so silly! It's even worse than the vampire-baseball in Twilight~"
The author completely de-fangs vampires for her books. They are complete losers who eat food, drink wine, go outside, and are Christians. The Twilight vampires are even more interesting than these yoga scientist vamps. Blech.
Kristina wrote: "The author completely de-fangs vampires for her books. They are complete losers who eat food, drink wine, go outside, and are Christians. The Twilight vampires are even more interesting than these yoga scientist vamps. Blech. "IKR? but at least Matthew's mother is hunting and drinking (animal) blood and killing the bad guys who killed her husband.
Mizuki wrote: "Kristina wrote: "The author completely de-fangs vampires for her books. They are complete losers who eat food, drink wine, go outside, and are Christians. The Twilight vampires are even more intere..."Matthew's mother is probably the most normal vamp in the books.
Kristina wrote: "Matthew's mother is probably the most normal vamp in the books. "Totally agree!
And Kristina, I found it's so stupid for Diana's parents to bind her magic to the guy she loves (Matthew)! What? So she shouldn't be using her magic for herself!? WTF?
Mizuki wrote: "Kristina wrote: "Matthew's mother is probably the most normal vamp in the books. "Totally agree!
And Kristina, I found it's so stupid for Diana's parents to bind her magic to the guy she loves (..."
Yeah...this isn't exactly a pro-woman novel. Diana is a good little girl and when she marries Matthew, she has to adhere to the tradition of being a vampire wife, which means she has to obey him at all times, do nothing to bring shame upon the vampire family name, etc. It's very disturbing. Diana is so dumb that she says, okay. And Matthew is a very controlling husband. Diana, who supposedly has the best witch powers ever, rarely uses them. It's very odd--a powerful witch not allowed or willing to use her own powers. Really, someone could write a paper on these 3 books.
Kristina wrote: "Diana is so dumb that she says, okay. And Matthew is a very controlling husband. Diana, who supposedly has the best witch powers ever, rarely uses them. It's very odd--a powerful witch not allowed or willing to use her own powers."This part is so messed up, at the beginning we are led to believe Diana doesn't want to use her power, then in the middle of ADOW, we are told her mother blocked her power for some silly reason! That's awful!
Yes, it's sickening to see a woman writing all this crap and not once did Diana call Matthew to back off...or she makes herself sound like she's not okay with Matthew's attitude but in the end she always gives in!>___<
Best review ever! I'm half way through this tedious book, but keep getting distracted by well written novels.
Mizuki wrote: "Kristina wrote: "Diana is so dumb that she says, okay. And Matthew is a very controlling husband. Diana, who supposedly has the best witch powers ever, rarely uses them. It's very odd--a powerful w..."One of the messages I took from this trilogy is that women should do what they're told...by men. They should always subdue their powers, authority, and independence and let the man lead. If you really want to read into it, it's rather old-fashioned and anti-feminist. It's also utter crap, story-wise.
Deborah wrote: "Best review ever! I'm half way through this tedious book, but keep getting distracted by well written novels."Thank you. I'm glad you're taking a break from this awful book by reading good ones. I'm the opposite--once I start a crap book that I intend to finish, I spend more time reading it--just to finish it. It's like eating your artichokes so you can enjoy the ice cream dessert.
Kristina wrote: "One of the messages I took from this trilogy is that women should do what they're told...by men. They should always subdue their powers, authority, and independence and let the man lead."Not to mention Diana is supposed to be a powerful witch, and she can't do better than letting a man boss her around.
Mizuki wrote: "Kristina wrote: "One of the messages I took from this trilogy is that women should do what they're told...by men. They should always subdue their powers, authority, and independence and let the man..."Okay, so I have a theory about this and similar books, notably Twilight and 50 Shades.
The fantastical and the magical are incredible aphrodisiacs for a lot of women. Same with power. While 50 Shades doesn't have magic or vampires, it does have power and obscene wealth. There's a huge appeal there for a lot of women, but there's also a great appeal in the conservative heteronormative ideal of romance - man meets woman, marries and has kids. These books all end like that. It's not enough for the woman to possess her own power for many - they want to be able to relinquish that power in favour of something simpler. It's that mix of the magic and the mundane that's like catnip to a huge demographic.
I may be talking bollocks, of course.
Mizuki wrote: "Kristina wrote: "One of the messages I took from this trilogy is that women should do what they're told...by men. They should always subdue their powers, authority, and independence and let the man..."Yes, but she's in LUUUUUVVVVV and supposedly that makes it okay.
Ceilidh wrote: "Mizuki wrote: "Kristina wrote: "One of the messages I took from this trilogy is that women should do what they're told...by men. They should always subdue their powers, authority, and independence ..."No, I think you're brilliant. You're exactly right--power, whether in the form of magic or money, is an aphrodisiac for women (for some men too I think but that's a different discussion). Look at a look of books in which the women have power or special abilities of some kind. That's all well and good, but what always ends up being at least as equally (if not more) important? The love angle. The woman has to have a love partner, and often (at least in popular books) the love partner is a man.
Mr. Grey has a lot of money and power and what's her name is very drawn to that. However, she can't just enjoy the ride (ha), she has to tame him.
Thank you for bringing this up--it's such an excellent perspective. Of course, even as I accept your hypothesis, it doesn't make me like the book any more. For me, it's a lesson how NOT to write.
Ceilidh wrote: "Mizuki wrote: "Kristina wrote: "One of the messages I took from this trilogy is that women should do what they're told...by men. They should always subdue their powers, authority, and independence ..."Having power is somewhat ego-stroking, for both men and women; and adding an love interest tagging along? It's even better. but we know reality doesn't work like this for most people.
This is the best, on-point review of this book and the series in general. I just finished the series tonight and now I wish I had never read them. I do have to say, though, that the secondary characters are MUCH more interesting than the two main ones.
This is the best, on-point review of this book and the series in general. I just finished the series tonight and now I wish I had never read them. I do have to say, though, that the secondary characters are MUCH more interesting than the two main ones.
Megan wrote: "This is the best, on-point review of this book and the series in general. I just finished the series tonight and now I wish I had never read them. I do have to say, though, that the secondary chara..."Thank you. I think my IQ dropped a few points because I read all three. The secondary characters are more interesting than Matthew and Diana, but really, those two idiots set the bar pretty low.
Shelley wrote: "Hilarious and 100% on point. "You two are the Brangelina of this idiot trilogy" made me LOL."Thank you. I had fun writing this review. When a book is this bad, it's almost too easy.
What?? No stretchy black yoga pants? How can that be?Thanks for a wonderful review, as usual: ...what the fuck. How can something this awful be a bestseller? My thoughts about the first book. Could not muster up the energy to read the second and definitely won't read the last.
On principle, I think I should boycott the BBC adaption, but I look forward to reading about it.
HєllyBєlly wrote: "What?? No stretchy black yoga pants? How can that be?Thanks for a wonderful review, as usual: ...what the fuck. How can something this awful be a bestseller? My thoughts about the first book. Cou..."
I was surprised that Diana did not wear stretchy black pants in this book as it would have appropriate (her pregnant with twins).
I cannot come up with any reason for this book being a best-seller other than:
1. It plays into the current (current for about 10 years) vampires are sexy fad.
2. It's a romance.
3. The majority of the reading public has absolutely no idea of what a good book should look like anymore. I don't necessarily blame the reading public for this. I blame publishers who don't give two shits about quality books anymore. It's all money, money, money.
Oh, I have great faith that the BBC will pull a decent series from these shitty books. There is a good book in there; it's just Viking's editors didn't give those previously mentioned two shits about finding it. I wish I knew someone in the BBC to ask them about the process--I'm guessing the show will look only a bit like the book. Sort of like the movie for that piece of shit book Paper Towns by John "I write novels that pander to the YA crowd" Green. The novel is sexist, pretentious, boring and stupid. The movie trailers I've seen on tv look NOTHING like the book. So a series of screen writers pulled a few kernals of goodness from what is a craptastic novel and the movie may actually be halfway decent. But I won't go see it. I refuse to give him money. I already pay for BBC (America) so I can watch the Harkness trilogy without adding to her bank account.
Kristina wrote: "HєllyBєlly wrote: "What?? No stretchy black yoga pants? How can that be?Thanks for a wonderful review, as usual: ...what the fuck. How can something this awful be a bestseller? My thoughts about ..."
I have not read anything by John Green, and by the sounds of it, I have not missed much. It is all about money, isn't it. Look at how much that Grey-business is making.
I hope that the BBC can find the good book inside all the unnecessary and boring details of Harkness' writing and make something worth watching. I hope you'll let us know!
I have not read anything by John Green, and by the sounds of it, I have not missed much. It is all about money, isn't it. Look at how much that Grey-business is making.I'm always reluctant to tell someone NOT to read something because not everyone has the same book tastes. But JG is horrible. I read him because a GR friend had written a bad review so I was curious (could this book be this bad?) and read it...yeah, it's that bad. Unless you enjoy pretentious teenagers speaking absolute nonsense and paper-thin characters, avoid JG.
Ah, the 50 Shades of Grey nonsense. That is truly commercialism at work. It's a terrible book. An editor (good editor with an endless supply of red ink) would have helped it, but in it's published form--so bad. Yet has made lots of money. The idea that so many people read ALL the books and thought they were good just makes me sad.
I hope that the BBC can find the good book inside all the unnecessary and boring details of Harkness' writing and make something worth watching. I hope you'll let us know!
Curiosity will force me to watch the Harkness tv adaption, at least the first few episodes. It's just in development now so I don't expect it to show up until maybe next year sometime. But I'll post an update letting everyone know!



