Ben Babcock's Reviews > Time Safari

Time Safari by David Drake
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
1188122
's review

did not like it
bookshelves: 2014-read, science-fiction, time-travel

I mean, really. It’s called Time Safari. Do I really have to explain it to you? It’s “A Sound of Thunder” but without the butterfly and with more sexual tension.

At some point in the future, the Israeli government has developed time travel. With a margin of error plus or minus 5000 years, it is useless for rewriting the recent past, but hunting expeditions to the Cretaceous provide a useful source of funding for the project. Henry Vickers is an experienced guide with the company. With this latest expedition, however, a jealous manbaby of a husband puts everyone’s lives in jeopardy, stranding them in the Cretaceous.

Actually, now that I write the summary out like that, I could see this becoming a compelling full-length novel. It just needs a subplot set “meanwhile, in the future” with Stern and Dr Galli discussing the various machinations of the time travel institute. And the interactions and motivations of the characters in the hunting expedition could be better explored. Most of the characters are mere stock caricatures pasted into the story because they need to be there. Aside from Vickers and Adrienne Salmes, the characters tend to be shallower than a wading pool at low tide.

Time Safari is action-adventure science fiction at its most lush. Drake doesn’t waste any time with any of that paradox temporal logic bullshit; he ignores the entire question of altering the future by hunting dinosaurs because they are hunting fucking dinosaurs. The plot itself could reasonably be set in a hunting expedition in the present; the time-travel conceit merely allows for an increased sense of isolation and more exotic source of danger. Really it’s about a straw person of an “anything you can do I can do better” woman who married a man who “isn’t man enough for her” and deals with this problem by sleeping with other men, who are presumably manlier and therefore more acceptable. Because strong, capable women only want stronger, more capable manly men, amirite? Actually, maybe the best thing about Time Safari is how Drake demonstrates that a man can try to write capable, three-dimensional characters and still fail spectacularly.

If one ignores the gratingly chauvinistic romance subplot, then what’s left is … well, not much. There is a modicum of pleasure to be had in Drake’s descriptions of hunting dinosaurs. Being neither a hunter nor a gun enthusiast myself, these descriptions did very little for me; your mileage my vary. That being said, Drake does a good job when it comes to the more tense action sequences, such as the showdown between the tyrannosaur and the helicopter.

Depending on the scientific explanations one lobs at the respective stories, Time Safari is still probably more believable than Jurassic Park….

Read as part of The Mammoth Book of Short Science Fiction Novels .

Creative Commons BY-NC License
2 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Time Safari.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

April 16, 2014 – Started Reading
April 16, 2014 – Finished Reading
April 27, 2014 – Shelved
April 27, 2014 – Shelved as: 2014-read
April 27, 2014 – Shelved as: science-fiction
April 27, 2014 – Shelved as: time-travel

Comments Showing 1-3 of 3 (3 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Cecily (new)

Cecily It sounds perfect fodder for adapting for the sci-fi channel as a glossy but empty mini-series.


message 2: by Ben (new) - rated it 1 star

Ben Babcock Cecily wrote: "It sounds perfect fodder for adapting for the sci-fi channel as a glossy but empty mini-series."

I’m surprised they haven’t used it already.

I don’t get SyFy in Canada, although a lot of their awful TV movies eventually make their way to Space. In the UK we’ve got SyFy on Sky, but I don’t spend much time watching it except for the occasional Star Trek rerun. They seem to have almost entirely given up on making new, good science-fiction series, with the exception of half-hearted funding for predominantly foreign productions like Continuum. Very disheartening.


message 3: by Cecily (new)

Cecily Oh yes, it's SyFy, isn't it? I don't watch it, but I catch snippets as my husband sometimes does, so I have a flavour of what it shows.


back to top