B Schrodinger's Reviews > The Humans
The Humans
by
by

** spoiler alert **
Firstly, I could not finish this. Although I did not hate the book there were too many aspects of the story that just annoyed me no end.
"The Humans" is the story of an alien who is sent to Earth to eliminate all traces of the newly found proof of the Reimann hypothesis, which is said to be too powerful and dangerous knowledge for an immature species as us. The alien possesses the mathematician who proves the hypothesis, a professor at a prestigious university, who is also having a lot of family problems. Good premise, but you can see where it is heading.
My main problems with this book come down to the suspension of disbelief and the constant attempts at being witty and quirky. The plot is only a facade for looking at humanity from a differing perspective, and despite what many would say in other reviews, it's not unique and it's not a revelation.
In my previous edit, I had a large pick at the scientific inaccuracies. And while they are quite valid and something that the author could have rectified easily, each is not much of a problem. There are plenty of books with wildly bad science that get away with it. It's just the pure number of them (and a little bit of me felt the author was trying to be clever by attempting to use science too) constantly jarred me. When you are rolling your eyes at the book you are reading every few pages, suspension of disbelief goes out the window.
On one page the alien was a naive blank slate, the next he had some prior knowledge suddenly, the next he was using keys with no problem. The alien main character only seemed to be naive or uninformed at the convenience of the author to make some glib observation, not to drive the plot and not in a consistent manner with the premise.
With all these inconsistencies and problems, I found it hard to read this clichéd and predictable story. I found the that the humour and wit of this book came down to the same inane memes that your aunt will share on Facebook: I hate Mondays humour, only my dog understands me humour, kids these days humour. The philosophical, worldly observations were as deep as those given on a motivational calendar.
It's a Hallmark book.
EDIT: I edited this review because a lot of other reviewers were critical of it. And while they'll always feel a need to write a remark about how I didn't understand some crucial plot point in the book, I do agree that my original review was much snarkier and less constructive than it should be. And I have the image of Matt Haig reading this and I want it to be as constructive as possible.
"The Humans" is the story of an alien who is sent to Earth to eliminate all traces of the newly found proof of the Reimann hypothesis, which is said to be too powerful and dangerous knowledge for an immature species as us. The alien possesses the mathematician who proves the hypothesis, a professor at a prestigious university, who is also having a lot of family problems. Good premise, but you can see where it is heading.
My main problems with this book come down to the suspension of disbelief and the constant attempts at being witty and quirky. The plot is only a facade for looking at humanity from a differing perspective, and despite what many would say in other reviews, it's not unique and it's not a revelation.
In my previous edit, I had a large pick at the scientific inaccuracies. And while they are quite valid and something that the author could have rectified easily, each is not much of a problem. There are plenty of books with wildly bad science that get away with it. It's just the pure number of them (and a little bit of me felt the author was trying to be clever by attempting to use science too) constantly jarred me. When you are rolling your eyes at the book you are reading every few pages, suspension of disbelief goes out the window.
On one page the alien was a naive blank slate, the next he had some prior knowledge suddenly, the next he was using keys with no problem. The alien main character only seemed to be naive or uninformed at the convenience of the author to make some glib observation, not to drive the plot and not in a consistent manner with the premise.
With all these inconsistencies and problems, I found it hard to read this clichéd and predictable story. I found the that the humour and wit of this book came down to the same inane memes that your aunt will share on Facebook: I hate Mondays humour, only my dog understands me humour, kids these days humour. The philosophical, worldly observations were as deep as those given on a motivational calendar.
It's a Hallmark book.
EDIT: I edited this review because a lot of other reviewers were critical of it. And while they'll always feel a need to write a remark about how I didn't understand some crucial plot point in the book, I do agree that my original review was much snarkier and less constructive than it should be. And I have the image of Matt Haig reading this and I want it to be as constructive as possible.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
The Humans.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
March 22, 2014
–
Started Reading
March 22, 2014
– Shelved
March 24, 2014
–
Finished Reading
April 6, 2014
– Shelved as:
science-fiction
Comments Showing 1-50 of 66 (66 new)


I don't know what urks me more in situations such as this (aside from content); the act of giving up on the book, or the investment I actually gave to it to try to make it work for me.



LOL Sara I'm sure you are fine with your FB posts.
Also a lot of people liked this book, don't just take my word for it. I guess I wasn't able to get over what I saw as flaws, but I'm sure others would glance right over and not think twice about.

Really enjoyed reading your review Brendon.

If the premise of the tabula rasa alien was replaced by an alien who had been briefed somewhat, the whole problem of him knowing the equivalent math would have been addressed and every funny encounter that was in the book could have been a countered for with culture shock. It could have even been funnier to play on the misunderstanding of the briefing to reality.

Sure but you need to feel like you want to believe in it. Even my 6 yo asks me why? why? why? when I read him a story with inconsistencies or somewhat random events that don't make sense.
I am sure that we will see more of this issue (well an issue for you and I, as other people have no problem with it) as independents and self publishing becomes more prevalent, which I am all for. The need of a good editor who knows what they are talking about, I would imagine is not easy to find.

"OMG Louisa, that book was freaking amazing. Can you believe he killed the mathematician? What about the dog? awww that was so cute.....we should get together and talk about the book, maybe we should read the second one together and discuss each chapter."
Karma

LOL
I'm glad I'm not the only one Louisa. And I hate to be so snobby but I really do think it appeals more to the 'only my dog understands me' crowd.
And I agree Lee. At least with a professionally published work you get some kind of guarantee that other people, and people who do this for a job, have looked this thing over and fixed up some mistakes. It's one of the main reasons why I also steer clear of self-publishing.

I think there are some pretty good reads to be found there, look at Wool but generally .....yeah....

Yeah definitely 'Wool', and I guess it does make you wonder and hope that much more of this type of success comes from it. But in reality when you have limited time and so much to read you have to hedge your bets with the process with quality control.

or read good quality reviews like this one :)

Thankful for the compliment Alex.
I wish the guy all the success, but despite it sounding so, it wasn't my type of book. It definitely was not without merit.


Authors like Robert Sawyer have done way better jobs at alien contact.

My thoughts exactly!!! I'm still reading the book (page 75), but I wondered several times why the alien seems to know some things and others not. Like you say, the author has searched for a way to look at humans from another perspective, apparently thought it should be some species more intelligent than humans themselves so he picked an alien, but didn't work it out all too well.
I got some other problems with the book but I will save those for my own review ;)



I'm fine with hand waving, it was used well for the science in The First Fifteen Lives of Harry August. Broad terms, no jargon, good research.
It's when jargon and specifics are used when we start to see flaws and the cracks start appearing.







I'd say give it a try!



It made me think of the unexpectedly impassioned fight over iodized table salt, base elements, and ions that resulted in a week of nasty, though educational emails. Yes, I was right, you refused to believe I knew what I was talking about, and you just wouldn't let it go. It was so stupid. So I responded by one-upping the stubborn by dusting of old textbooks. Yoy hit a nerve, then kept poking it. No longer just annoyed, I was pissed off and had a lot of spare time on my hands. So I dusted off the old textbooks and commenced the writing of my essays "You had to be a dick about it so I'll match it with my bitch: This is how wrong you are."
So I went ahead and read the responses to your critique and the overwhelming support and empathy with your frustrations. And that's when I knew I hit gold and had to get my hands on this book, because a book eliciting this kind of reaction must be so bad it had to painfully funny. And so far (at page 8) that assumption has been painfully accurate.
So I get it now. I understand. Its the iodized salt and that movie "the forgotten" all over again.
I don't expect I will ever finish this book, but I think these 8 pages have been worth it because this review was the real treat to read, and I couldn't fully appreciate it until familiarizing myself with the source material.
So thanks for the fun read! I had fun. :)

Looking back, I did get rather annoyed at the scientific inaccuracies, but really the most annoying aspects was the inconsistencies within his own 'experiment'. If you create a situation and then choose to apply it in some ways yet completely ignore it in others, it's going to undermine the whole premise.







In the beginning of the book, the alien does not POSSESS the professor, he kills him and copies the body of the professor onto himself. The the professor is dead for the whole book. Also, does it REALLY matter if not all the details are perfect-can you not enjoy the book for what it is? I love this book-it's witty, heartbreaking, and gives you an insight into what someone else might think about human life, and all the weird little things we do.
Great review. Bummer that the book wasn't something that you enjoyed.