Jonathan's Reviews > The Everlasting Man
The Everlasting Man
by G.K. Chesterton
The Everlasting Man is not your typical Christian apologetics classic. I say this because G.K. Chesterton is not aiming to write a pure 'defence of the faith' as it were, but to write a work that better explores the relationship of Christianity to history. It has become something of a fashionable statement to ignore the relevance of Christianity as it pertains to history and so Chesterton sets out to first explore the concept of God and his role as more than merely just another aspect of mythology and then to explore the relationship between God and man as seen in Christ.
Chesterton makes strong arguments and bold arguments. In doing so he highlights the importance of sticking to one's beliefs. That is why I hold onto my beliefs whether they are...fashionable or not. If I allow my views to merely sway with the breeze of popularity, then what kind of truths do I really believe in? In other words, Chesterton explains the necessity of holding fast to Orthodoxy for himself - a view which others can take to heart. Too often when situations arise in modern society the response of an individual is to change their world-view to accommodate such a situation, when perhaps one should change the response and not the view. Otherwise, all it says is 'I have no strong conviction.'
Chesterton makes use of his skill with paradox with such statements as: "Nero could not hire a hundred Christians to be eaten by lions at a shilling an hour, for men will not be martyred for money." There is a sense through Chesterton's writing that he aims to show how Christianity is not another mythology but something different in history. There have been many creation stories, yet how many religions feature the Creator becoming one of his own Creations to save that Creation? That, Chesterton notes, is an interesting kind of paradoxical situation in itself.
Perhaps my favourite quote from this work is found on page four: "When the world goes wrong, it proves rather that the Church is right. The Church is justified not because her children do not sin, but because they do." To me this is perfect in that it explains the one thing I often feel like explaining to people. They look at Christians and Christianity and believe it is about morality or ethics, but the gospel is not a tool for purely creating 'good' or 'morally right' people. As Romans 3:23-24 states "23 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, 24 and all are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus." The church should be full of people just as hurt, broken and failing as the world, and it is when the church contains such people that the message of the gospel should be seen...
Of course if you've read this far through my review you'd be aware that this is a book aimed more at Christians or those actively seeking answers to life from various viewpoints. I find that Chesterton is the best writer I have discovered at providing logical and sound reasons for belief. And in doing so he shows that Christianity is special and that faith and logic are not so different as some may believe.
by G.K. Chesterton
Jonathan's review
bookshelves: own, g-k-chesterton, faith, historical, non-fiction, classic-literature, personal-favourites
Jan 12, 2014
bookshelves: own, g-k-chesterton, faith, historical, non-fiction, classic-literature, personal-favourites
Read from January 12 to 18, 2014
— I own a copy
The Everlasting Man is not your typical Christian apologetics classic. I say this because G.K. Chesterton is not aiming to write a pure 'defence of the faith' as it were, but to write a work that better explores the relationship of Christianity to history. It has become something of a fashionable statement to ignore the relevance of Christianity as it pertains to history and so Chesterton sets out to first explore the concept of God and his role as more than merely just another aspect of mythology and then to explore the relationship between God and man as seen in Christ.
Chesterton makes strong arguments and bold arguments. In doing so he highlights the importance of sticking to one's beliefs. That is why I hold onto my beliefs whether they are...fashionable or not. If I allow my views to merely sway with the breeze of popularity, then what kind of truths do I really believe in? In other words, Chesterton explains the necessity of holding fast to Orthodoxy for himself - a view which others can take to heart. Too often when situations arise in modern society the response of an individual is to change their world-view to accommodate such a situation, when perhaps one should change the response and not the view. Otherwise, all it says is 'I have no strong conviction.'
Chesterton makes use of his skill with paradox with such statements as: "Nero could not hire a hundred Christians to be eaten by lions at a shilling an hour, for men will not be martyred for money." There is a sense through Chesterton's writing that he aims to show how Christianity is not another mythology but something different in history. There have been many creation stories, yet how many religions feature the Creator becoming one of his own Creations to save that Creation? That, Chesterton notes, is an interesting kind of paradoxical situation in itself.
Perhaps my favourite quote from this work is found on page four: "When the world goes wrong, it proves rather that the Church is right. The Church is justified not because her children do not sin, but because they do." To me this is perfect in that it explains the one thing I often feel like explaining to people. They look at Christians and Christianity and believe it is about morality or ethics, but the gospel is not a tool for purely creating 'good' or 'morally right' people. As Romans 3:23-24 states "23 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, 24 and all are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus." The church should be full of people just as hurt, broken and failing as the world, and it is when the church contains such people that the message of the gospel should be seen...
Of course if you've read this far through my review you'd be aware that this is a book aimed more at Christians or those actively seeking answers to life from various viewpoints. I find that Chesterton is the best writer I have discovered at providing logical and sound reasons for belief. And in doing so he shows that Christianity is special and that faith and logic are not so different as some may believe.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
The Everlasting Man.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
| 01/12/2014 | marked as: | currently-reading | ||
| 01/16/2014 | page 120 |
|
45.0% | "I appreciate how Chesterton can deliver an argument on why Christianity is/can be/or at least should be far more rational than many do believe. His discussions on the false comparisons between what science does and covers and what religion does are fascinating..." |
| 01/18/2014 | marked as: | read | ||
Comments (showing 1-7 of 7) (7 new)
date
newest »
newest »
Lynne wrote: "Well Jonathan what a super review and you've certainly persuaded me to read this book.I especially like reading books on Sundays. It's sometimes more special as it is a day of rest and also a day..."
Thank you Lynne. I've been watching sport for most of this Sunday, although I do appreciate the restful nature of watching sport and reading a book the same time...
He is a master of paradox. And the world is made in such a way that the gospel is a paradox. I find his writing to be very dense-- not so easy to breeze through if I'm to find the meaning.
Good stuff
Michael wrote: "He is a master of paradox. And the world is made in such a way that the gospel is a paradox. I find his writing to be very dense-- not so easy to breeze through if I'm to find the meaning.
Goo..."
He certainly earns his title of 'prince of paradox'. His writing is dense and clearly both of his breeding and time, yet I find it wonderful in how he weaves his way through arguments with words. He is never clumsy despite his dense use of words. It's...elaborate more than anything.
Michael wrote: "Yes, he's almost like a ballet dancer the way he never missteps."Great simile right there!


I especially like reading books on Sundays. It's sometimes more special as it is a day of rest and also a day of reflection.