Ben Babcock's Reviews > Replay

Replay by Ken Grimwood
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
1188122
's review

did not like it
bookshelves: 2015-read, audio, from-library, science-fiction, time-travel

** spoiler alert ** For the first time in a while, I actually regret sticking out this book instead of DNF-ing it. It was bad. Just as I was starting to lose all hope, there was a glimmer a couple of hours in that made me hang on a bit longer. And then I figured I might as well finish the whole thing just to learn why Jeff keeps replaying parts of his life. Because when you get right down to it, Replay has a sick and amazing premise, but Ken Grimwood's writing leaves much to be desired.

Grimwood's prose is so purple I'm surprised it's not gangrenous. I listened to the audio version (because that was the only version available from my library), mostly at 2.4x speed, and it still felt like too long. Grimwood feels it's necessary to describe every single thing in detail. It's not just a table; it's a luxurious oak table with a fine gold inlay that Jeff purchased with money he won or got from investments or whatever. She's not just a woman; she has pert yet simultaneously round breasts that rise just the right amount as she raises her long, slender arms above her head. Every time Jeff picks up a glass of wine or looks at an album label the narrator has to interject with some kind of commentary on the vintage or irrelevant facts about the career of that band.

It is, quite literally, a maddening experience.

I could almost forgive that, but Replay is also just creepily male gazey. At one point, pretty early on in the novel, Jeff literally calls a woman "a machine made for fucking."

NO.

You just don't say that, ever, with the possible exception of writing (bad) erotic fiction.

Oh, and then he gives that character a huge bag of money because he's breaking up with her, and she pity fucks him, because "for $250,000 you deserve it." What??

But this isn't just poor writing. Indeed, it should be a laudable thing when I inform you that, aside from Jeff, almost every other character of note in this book is a woman. That is, until you realize that's the case because they are all sex interests for Jeff. Grimwood spends an inordinate time focusing on Jeff's sex life. The bulk of Jeff's replays focus on which woman he decides to shack up with and how well she satisfies his physical and emotional man-baby needs. And with the exception of his mother (because ew), even if Jeff doesn't sleep with a woman, he still thinks about sleeping with her, and the narrator describes her entirely in terms of how fuckable she is.

This is pretty much the textbook example of male gaze. It's painful to listen to this for hours on end. Now I know what's like for women to watch or read most movies or books. So, yeah. Thanks, Replay, for helping me to build empathy with how women feel in our society by being so terribly creepy? I think?

It's just such a shame that this amazing premise gets squandered. Jeff, and then Jeff and Pamela when he meets her during his third replay, speculate a little as to the cause and reason behind their staggered, spiralling reincarnations. Yet there is no payoff. None. We never learn why or how they keep reliving their lives, just that they have learned some big lesson about making the most out of their futures. Except I'm pretty sure that Jeff is just going to continue evaluating women's worth as sex objects and being a terrible husband, because he is the worst.

Just don't read this book.

Creative Commons BY-NC License
19 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Replay.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

September 19, 2009 – Shelved
December 15, 2015 – Started Reading
December 19, 2015 –
100.0%
December 19, 2015 – Finished Reading
December 22, 2015 – Shelved as: 2015-read
December 22, 2015 – Shelved as: audio
December 22, 2015 – Shelved as: from-library
December 22, 2015 – Shelved as: science-fiction
December 22, 2015 – Shelved as: time-travel

Comments Showing 1-7 of 7 (7 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Trish (new)

Trish Don' cha jus' hate it?


Stuart I just finished this in audio and you're right that most of the book is devoted to Jeff's sexual exploits, and I also rolled my eyes in disgust at the exact parts you highlighted. As you said, it was a very promising concept that he squandered. I did find the latter half more interesting once the hedonistic first half played out, and I was ok with getting no final explanation for "why" the replays were happening, because I doubt there could be any satisfactory reason.
Actually, maybe the author thinks that most men would aim to get rich and laid as much as possible, and that it would take quite a few cycles before they tired of that and pursued more spiritual goals???


message 3: by Ben (new) - rated it 1 star

Ben Babcock You have some good points there. Maybe Grimwood couldn't come up with a good reason; I like to think a better author could have!


Jacquelyn Yes, the book was particularly male-gazey. (SPOILERS AHEAD) I also found it cringe-worthy when, after spending his replay getting rich and laid, he decides to marry his (virgin) college girlfriend because she has "an innocence worth cultivating". That line was pretty creepy and I got the feeling throughout the book that Jeff really never outgrows considering women as objects.


message 5: by Ben (new) - rated it 1 star

Ben Babcock Jacquelyn wrote: "That line was pretty creepy and I got the feeling throughout the book that Jeff really never outgrows considering women as objects."

Yuppppppp, But oh snap, what if you’ve got it? What if the whole reason Jeff is reliving things is because it’s some kind of curse? He is doomed to repeating his life until he stops treating women like objects.

I’d like to say that’s the subversive point this book is trying to make but I think we both now that Grimwood is not being that clever or deep. -_-


Barbara Young Wish I'd written this review. Were men that bad even back in 1986? I tried to give Grimwood the benefit of the doubt based on when the book was published, but still. . .


message 7: by Ben (new) - rated it 1 star

Ben Babcock Barbara wrote: "Wish I'd written this review. Were men that bad even back in 1986? I tried to give Grimwood the benefit of the doubt based on when the book was published, but still. . ."

Welllllll I was born in 1989, so unless I get reincarnated into a body in 1986 I’m not sure I can answer that question! :D


back to top