Heather K (dentist in my spare time)'s Reviews > The Book of Life
The Book of Life (All Souls Trilogy, #3)
by
by
Heather K (dentist in my spare time)'s review
bookshelves: vampire, read-to-review-arc, paranormal, net-galley, magic, m-f, little-to-no-sex-content, hype-hype-hype, everyone-else-loves-it
Apr 26, 2013
bookshelves: vampire, read-to-review-arc, paranormal, net-galley, magic, m-f, little-to-no-sex-content, hype-hype-hype, everyone-else-loves-it
What a huge let down this book was. I'm talking EPIC proportion let down.
First of all, I am shocked at all the positive reviews I'm seeing. I feel like we didn't read the same book.
A Discovery of Witches was one of my favorite reads of 2011. I wasn't as much into reading then, and I stumbled across this one while randomly perusing my library for books. I fell in love with the story, the characters, and the magic of it all. I felt like the story was building up for something important, something powerful.
The second book was also pretty successful for me. It was lovely in the way that I find historical fiction is pleasurable. I also have a deep love of time-travel books, so I was practically guaranteed to fall head over heels.
A lot of time has passed since the second, and my expectations were sky high for the third. Unfortunately, the careful world-building fell to crap in the final installment. I'll try to break down my main issues with the story without giving away any spoilers.
1) The POV switches: I have very specific opinions about lots of POVs in the a story: Namely, I hate them. This book had at least 5 different points of view, which irritated me to no end. Why not just two? Those extra points of view just seemed lazy to me, just a way for the author to do some "telling" and less "showing" about the characters. To make matters worse, the author switched from 1st to 3rd person throughout the book! Talk about a headache. It was a terrible choice, in my opinion.
2) The number of characters: This book was like a who's who from the previous two books. I swear, no one was left out. There were so many people re-introduced that I had a hard time keeping track of everyone. The story felt so... cluttered. All of these extra people and their minor storylines weighed the plot down so much. It became sort of jumbled and confusing. I'm not sure why the author didn't just keep her focus on the main characters.
3) The lack of secrecy: I'm so confused! In the previous books, Diana and Matthew guarded the secret of their relationship, the quest for the book, and the secrets of Matthew's family fiercely. In this book? They let it alllll hang out. They tell everyone EVERYTHING! Everyone seems to know what they are searching for, that Diana is pregnant, simply everything! I have no idea why this had them throwing caution to the wind. They freaking told an entire class of students what they were researching. It was madness. Then they are looking for the person "leaking their secrets"... it could be the pizza boy for all they know! It was truly bizarre.
4) Diana's familiar: I won't say too much about this topic so I don't give away any spoilers, but I was utterly confused about the change in the firedrake's personality throughout the story, especially towards the end.
5) The haphazard plot: It honestly felt like the author didn't think this trilogy through very well. It was like the author had a brilliant idea for the first book and then had no idea how to carry it through. The third book had to reveal some mind blowing things to fit with all the buildup, but instead it was a collection of jumbled tangents. The main characters jumped from location to location, doing a series of things that didn't really make sense. They seemed like chickens with their heads cut off. The book didn't seemed planned. It was almost as though the author was making it up on the fly.
6) The blood rage thing: I hated this plot point. Blood rage was supposed to be this crazy thing, but some deep breathing and zen meditation seemed to snap all the characters out of it?? I was so confused as to why it was this big issue to begin with if it was that easy to control. I would have preferred it be a mindless, insane thing instead of the nuisance it was made out to be. It was a poorly fleshed out concept that could have been more powerful.
7) The Book: Okay, what is the deal with that book? We never truly get answers. I still am left wondering who created it and why. If you are reading this book thinking that something wondrous will be revealed, don't hold your breath.
8) Plot inconsistencies: There are so many plot elements that make no sense or are left dangling. I don't want to go into them all because I want this review to be spoiler free, but there were many instances where the book contradicts itself.
All in all, this book was a huge bummer. I give it 2 stars, mainly for nostalgia because I was happy to visit with these characters again.
Oh, and can Gallowglass get his own book? Pretty please?
**Copy provided by the publisher in exchange for an honest review**
First of all, I am shocked at all the positive reviews I'm seeing. I feel like we didn't read the same book.
A Discovery of Witches was one of my favorite reads of 2011. I wasn't as much into reading then, and I stumbled across this one while randomly perusing my library for books. I fell in love with the story, the characters, and the magic of it all. I felt like the story was building up for something important, something powerful.
The second book was also pretty successful for me. It was lovely in the way that I find historical fiction is pleasurable. I also have a deep love of time-travel books, so I was practically guaranteed to fall head over heels.
A lot of time has passed since the second, and my expectations were sky high for the third. Unfortunately, the careful world-building fell to crap in the final installment. I'll try to break down my main issues with the story without giving away any spoilers.
1) The POV switches: I have very specific opinions about lots of POVs in the a story: Namely, I hate them. This book had at least 5 different points of view, which irritated me to no end. Why not just two? Those extra points of view just seemed lazy to me, just a way for the author to do some "telling" and less "showing" about the characters. To make matters worse, the author switched from 1st to 3rd person throughout the book! Talk about a headache. It was a terrible choice, in my opinion.
2) The number of characters: This book was like a who's who from the previous two books. I swear, no one was left out. There were so many people re-introduced that I had a hard time keeping track of everyone. The story felt so... cluttered. All of these extra people and their minor storylines weighed the plot down so much. It became sort of jumbled and confusing. I'm not sure why the author didn't just keep her focus on the main characters.
3) The lack of secrecy: I'm so confused! In the previous books, Diana and Matthew guarded the secret of their relationship, the quest for the book, and the secrets of Matthew's family fiercely. In this book? They let it alllll hang out. They tell everyone EVERYTHING! Everyone seems to know what they are searching for, that Diana is pregnant, simply everything! I have no idea why this had them throwing caution to the wind. They freaking told an entire class of students what they were researching. It was madness. Then they are looking for the person "leaking their secrets"... it could be the pizza boy for all they know! It was truly bizarre.
4) Diana's familiar: I won't say too much about this topic so I don't give away any spoilers, but I was utterly confused about the change in the firedrake's personality throughout the story, especially towards the end.
5) The haphazard plot: It honestly felt like the author didn't think this trilogy through very well. It was like the author had a brilliant idea for the first book and then had no idea how to carry it through. The third book had to reveal some mind blowing things to fit with all the buildup, but instead it was a collection of jumbled tangents. The main characters jumped from location to location, doing a series of things that didn't really make sense. They seemed like chickens with their heads cut off. The book didn't seemed planned. It was almost as though the author was making it up on the fly.
6) The blood rage thing: I hated this plot point. Blood rage was supposed to be this crazy thing, but some deep breathing and zen meditation seemed to snap all the characters out of it?? I was so confused as to why it was this big issue to begin with if it was that easy to control. I would have preferred it be a mindless, insane thing instead of the nuisance it was made out to be. It was a poorly fleshed out concept that could have been more powerful.
7) The Book: Okay, what is the deal with that book? We never truly get answers. I still am left wondering who created it and why. If you are reading this book thinking that something wondrous will be revealed, don't hold your breath.
8) Plot inconsistencies: There are so many plot elements that make no sense or are left dangling. I don't want to go into them all because I want this review to be spoiler free, but there were many instances where the book contradicts itself.
All in all, this book was a huge bummer. I give it 2 stars, mainly for nostalgia because I was happy to visit with these characters again.
Oh, and can Gallowglass get his own book? Pretty please?
**Copy provided by the publisher in exchange for an honest review**
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
The Book of Life.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
April 26, 2013
– Shelved
April 26, 2013
– Shelved as:
to-read
July 4, 2014
–
Started Reading
July 8, 2014
–
8.0%
July 8, 2014
–
8.0%
July 9, 2014
–
17.0%
July 10, 2014
–
25.0%
July 18, 2014
– Shelved as:
vampire
July 18, 2014
– Shelved as:
read-to-review-arc
July 18, 2014
– Shelved as:
paranormal
July 18, 2014
– Shelved as:
net-galley
July 18, 2014
– Shelved as:
magic
July 18, 2014
– Shelved as:
m-f
July 18, 2014
– Shelved as:
little-to-no-sex-content
July 18, 2014
– Shelved as:
hype-hype-hype
July 18, 2014
– Shelved as:
everyone-else-loves-it
July 18, 2014
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-50 of 243 (243 new)
message 1:
by
Alexandra
(new)
-
added it
Jul 04, 2014 07:44PM
Oooh, jealous! Can't wait to read your review. :)
reply
|
flag
*
Trish wrote: "Jealous! p.s they return home"I'm pretty lost right now! I have to quickly remember everything!
I'm clearing the decks for this book. I'm getting the audio version, too, so I can spend every minute with the story. Now I'm a bit afraid I won't like it as much as I did the previous ones.
Nila wrote: "I'm clearing the decks for this book. I'm getting the audio version, too, so I can spend every minute with the story. Now I'm a bit afraid I won't like it as much as I did the previous ones."I'm not, to be honest. I read the others years ago when they were first published and this one isn't holding my attention the same way. I'm liking it enough but it feels long, which isn't a great sign.
I was enchanted by the first book; less so by #2. I don't think I even finished it. For me, book 1 was an enchantment because I wasn't familiar with anything in that magical world. Unfortunately, I did a history major in college, so the second wasn't as big a mystery of as big a pleasure.
Simon wrote: "YAY! I have my download ready and waiting!"I'm about 75% done. Right now it's 3 stars for me.
Heather K (dentist in my spare time) wrote: "Simon wrote: "YAY! I have my download ready and waiting!"I'm about 75% done. Right now it's 3 stars for me."
OH! NO! Only 3. God I hate it when the finale is shit!
Simon wrote: "Heather K (dentist in my spare time) wrote: "Simon wrote: "YAY! I have my download ready and waiting!"I'm about 75% done. Right now it's 3 stars for me."
OH! NO! Only 3. God I hate it when the f..."
ME too. I'm trying to finish tonight but it is a very long book!
Dianna wrote: "I'm really curious as to what you think about the ending-it went from three down to two for me."I was hoping it was going to get better and it didn't. I would have rated it even lower but I was feeling nostalgic for the characters.
Craaaaaap. I loved the first as well, Heather, but the found the second to be a huge letdown. I think I'll avoid this one and just make up my own ending, because all the issues you listed would make me rage.
Litchick (is stuck in the 19th century) wrote: "Craaaaaap. I loved the first as well, Heather, but the found the second to be a huge letdown. I think I'll avoid this one and just make up my own ending, because all the issues you listed would mak..."I'm with you. I want to remake the book in my head so I'm happier. I'm so surprised at all the gushing reviews.
I've stopped being surprised by gushing reviews for the final books in series. I figure that most people are wearing their fangirl glasses by that point. They're the beer goggles of the literary world.
message 18:
by
Heather K (dentist in my spare time)
(last edited Jul 20, 2014 10:55AM)
(new)
-
rated it 2 stars
Litchick (is stuck in the 19th century) wrote: "I've stopped being surprised by gushing reviews for the final books in series. I figure that most people are wearing their fangirl glasses by that point. They're the beer goggles of the literary wo..."Love that "beer goggles" phrase! Too true.
R * A Reader Obsessed * wrote: "This is kinda disheartening since I loved the first… but haven't read the 2nd yet"Well, I liked the second so I think you should give it a go. It wasn't nearly as good as the first, though.
Well, I'm glad I didn't read past the first book. lol!Bummer when a good series goes south...great review, Heather!
Jill wrote: "Well, I'm glad I didn't read past the first book. lol!Bummer when a good series goes south...great review, Heather!"
Thanks, Jill! It was a big let down :(
You have hit the nail on the head my friend! I adore the first 2 books and was left completely unfulfilled. I agree with your explanations, especially #4 through #8. Love Gallowglass as well :) Your point in #7 is right on the money. All that said, I will definitely read anything else she comes out with.
Katie wrote: "You have hit the nail on the head my friend! I adore the first 2 books and was left completely unfulfilled. I agree with your explanations, especially #4 through #8. Love Gallowglass as well :) You..."Thank you! It was such a let down, wasn't it? I could seriously go for a whole Gallowglass spin off series!
Totally agree. I was left confused and disappointed. I wish the author had at the least given Gallowglass an ending. He was my favorite character.
Aimee wrote: "Totally agree. I was left confused and disappointed. I wish the author had at the least given Gallowglass an ending. He was my favorite character."I know, right? Gallowglass was the highlight of this book for me.
Jackie wrote: "Thank you for this. been wondering if it's worth it to read book 3 and it sounds like no."In my opinion, it isn't. I felt highly dissatisfied by it.
I read the first book and half of the second. This one sounds awful. How sad for you! Good job outlining the problem areas.
Kathleen wrote: "I read the first book and half of the second. This one sounds awful. How sad for you! Good job outlining the problem areas."What Kathleen said! I loathe multiple POVs! Three aren't so bad but anything more than that can be very aggravating or a book killer.
Kathleen wrote: "I read the first book and half of the second. This one sounds awful. How sad for you! Good job outlining the problem areas."It really was, Kathleen. And I hear the audible version is even worse.
Thanks, BTW :)
Anna (Bobs Her Hair) wrote: "Kathleen wrote: "I read the first book and half of the second. This one sounds awful. How sad for you! Good job outlining the problem areas."What Kathleen said! I loathe multiple POVs! Three are..."
Multiple POVs make me rage! It can kill a good book and this wasn't even good.
anieva wrote: "Good points, especially 5 and 8."Thank you! There were so many times when I thought, "Well, didn't the characters just say the opposite??" The plot was a bumbling mess.
Franny wrote: "I came away with some big questions unanswered, too. Who created the darn book and when?"I know! I still have as many answers as I did at the beginning. This author needs to take a hint from the Fever series on how to end a series.
omg everything about this review. EVERYTHING EVERYTHING EVERYTHING EVERYTHING...just thank you. I agreed with it all and it's nice to know I wasn't the only one who had these thoughts.
I mean really, though. She's a professor. Can probably write academic papers in her sleep, but storytelling is entirely different. This trilogy was her first attempt at published fiction, I believe. She just jumped into the deep end -- 1500 pages that meandered around to a standstill, and characters who never developed into something more.
Kathleen wrote: "I mean really, though. She's a professor. Can probably write academic papers in her sleep, but storytelling is entirely different. This trilogy was her first attempt at published fiction, I believe..."oh gosh can we be friends in real life? like seriously though?! so much truth.
Candace wrote: "So you're telling me [spoilers removed]Are you SERIOUS?!"
That is exactly what i'm telling you!!
Danielle wrote: "omg everything about this review. EVERYTHING EVERYTHING EVERYTHING EVERYTHING...just thank you. I agreed with it all and it's nice to know I wasn't the only one who had these thoughts."*hugs*
You are not the only one!
Kathleen wrote: "I mean really, though. She's a professor. Can probably write academic papers in her sleep, but storytelling is entirely different. This trilogy was her first attempt at published fiction, I believe..."Yes, this!
A letdown for me also after the first 2 books. Agree, haphazard, inconsistent plot, the who's who, and wanted also to know more about who made the book and the blood rage thing
Pam wrote: "A letdown for me also after the first 2 books. Agree, haphazard, inconsistent plot, the who's who, and wanted also to know more about who made the book and the blood rage thing"Me too. The blood rage thing was so weird.
Blood rage? She may have stolen the idea from another UF novel, like Bayou Moon or Cry Wolf. I don't think she is well versed in this genre. I heard her speak at our local bookstore after book 1 came out, and she said she had never read any fantasy-romance novels except those written by Anne Rice decades ago.
Kathleen wrote: "Blood rage? She may have stolen the idea from another UF novel, like Bayou Moon or Cry Wolf. I don't think she is well versed in this genre. I heard her speak at our l..."That explains so much.
Kathleen wrote: "Danielle, we already R friends in real life! This is as real as it gets. ;-)"ahahaha so much wisdom!!
Kathleen wrote: "Blood rage? She may have stolen the idea from another UF novel, like Bayou Moon or Cry Wolf. I don't think she is well versed in this genre. I heard her speak at our l..."Oh gosh she read Anne Rice and her books turned out like this?!?! I just can't.....just whatever...blood rage plot whatever it was, was a waste of my life.







