Morgan Schulman's Reviews > In Praise of Messy Lives: Essays

In Praise of Messy Lives by Katie Roiphe
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
8389917
's review
Jan 12, 2013

it was ok
Read on January 26, 2013

I kind of amazed how many reviewers were completely aware of the controversy surrounding this author.

For those unaware- let me summarize. She is the daughter of a famous Second Wave feminist, and has spent her career bashing feminism for being "sexually conservative". She made her name in the 90s by writing a book in response to the Take Back the Night movement by basically laying out that college feminists were exaggerating rape statistics because they are anti-sex. She is known less for her writing then for being a dick, and most of us are just hate-reading.

And God knows, this book does not disappoint. Katie has trouble being friends with women; she slept with one of her few friend's bfs, and the girl had the square audacity to get pissed (it is spelled out that this girl is un-modishly fat); liberals hate her because they are prudish about her being a single mother, and the primary plight of single mothers is not getting invited to couples only dinner parties on the UES; Philip Roth and Norman Mailer are just joshing with that whole woman-fucking-cucumber business can't you take a joke?; incest is so passé; Austen readers are just the upper-middlebrow version of women following "The Rules"; andonandonandon.

I'll give this book two stars because there was nothing awful about date-rape or HIV. But the incest chapter came close. I had more fun hate-reading Caitlyn Flanagan and Maureen Dowd, who each take punches in this book, which is saying something.
3 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read In Praise of Messy Lives.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

12/21/2016 marked as: read

Comments (showing 1-2 of 2) (2 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Lisa I find it slightly hard to take exception, as a feminist, to Katie Roiphe's essay about how people treat her as a single mother. No matter her reputation, it seems that no feminist on earth would feel comfortable with the people around her questioning her CHOICE to go it alone. (I believe the primary plight was not invites, but rather the hostility faced by liberal folks who prove themselves to be quite puritanical, in general). The Philip Roth/Mailer/Updike novel was less about them and more about the faux-gentleness of contemporary male writers, and how looking at the inheritors of their domain are far more polite, put possibly less impactful. I don't think she excuses the cucumbers, but instead analyzes them. I'm super ok with people taking exception to her and her previous work (cause that was intense), but it feels like many are reviewing that work rather than the book itself. And that's just not helpful. If nothing else, whether I agree or disagree, I'm happy to see that Katie Roiphe is writing rigorous, critical work. I'd like to see more women at least make a note of her excellent writing and thinking skills, before the slam of the content comes.


Kelly McCloskey-Romero I appreciate that you gave some background to who she is and why she's so hated by some, but I agree with this last comment that you may not be giving her enough credit.


back to top