My favorite part of the book: his amateurish attempt at biblical criticism and dating of Acts and firm declaration that there was no real rift between Paul and Peter. Let's just throw out what the majority of scholars say about these matters! Even more fun, his musings about these issues are embedded in a rather bizarre argument that attempts not to just, WLC style, establish facts surrounding the resurrection in particular, but to establish the factual accuracy of the bible as a whole. Hey, if the NT is sometimes factual it always is ;). It didn't help that by then I had suffered through his presentation of natural theological arguments for God's existence and in particular his terrible, non sequitur-filled argument from morality. And to top it off Moreland knows not only how to best defend Christianity from its critics, but how to organize its churches as well. Weeee