Join Goodreads

and meet your next favorite book!

Sign Up Now
Manny rated a book really liked it
about 6 years ago
Read in January 1972
Unfortunately, most of the best bits in the movie aren't in the book. The first one I think of is the sequence where Bowman has finally arrived at Jupiter. In the book, it's Saturn, and the Monolith is in the moon Iapetus; this is clever, and from a scientific point of view a more plausible place to put it, but poetically is completely flat.

In the movie, we get this unforgettable picture of all the Jovian satellites majestically lining up to the strains of Thus Spake Zarathustra; every time I hear someone use the expression "get your ducks in a row", my mind flashes a mental image of this scene, but with ducks instead of moons. I'm sure that proves something, though I must admit I'm not quite sure what.
Manny Thank you! And I remember quite enjoying the first book as a teen...
  • 3 years ago
Maria That sounded like a spoiler alert! Haha Well I'll read the first book anyways. Thanks for your reply, I always enjoy your reviews.
  • 3 years ago
Manny I saw the movie of 2010 and decided that was enough. I'm sorry that no one wants to watch the original one with you!
  • 3 years ago
Maria I agree with Manny, this movie is a masterpiece, unfortunately at home no one wants to sit with me to watch it. Everybody suddenly disappear! However I do need to read the book! Have you read the entire collection?
  • 3 years ago
Manny You are so wrong. One of the crew members who's killed by HAL is a strong, vibrant female astronaut who was due to be thawed out when they got to Jupiter. Unfortunately, you only ever see her covered in ice in her suspended animation coffin, so you'll have to take my word for it, but would I lie to you?
  • 6 years ago
notgettingenough No, hang on. That isn't what I meant to say at all. What I MEANT to say is that this movie and I am supposing this book are SO not feminist. I mean, what is it with these guys? There is no female robot, let along a strong female robot who would make a good role model for girls thinking of becoming robots. Why SHOULD the baddie be a boy? It's no wonder girls are so good all the time. They aren't given enough appropriate role models for alternative ways of approaching the world. Sexist stereotyping if ever I saw it. There is a bit part for one girl doctor. Ha.

The girls, if you look at the list of characters are all 'stewardesses', if you can stretch a point and call stewardesses characters.

So, why couldn't the girls be upgraded to stewards? And if you are going to tell me that stewardesses are equal to stewards, then why couldn't the movie have apesses? I mean, it's got all these apes? How sexist is that? And why aren't there any astronautesses?

I am thinking here that only a real misogynist could think this was a good film. Unless you are going to argue that it is set in its period and that it is no more than an accurate reflection of society at the time of the setting of the book/movie. Go on. I dare you.
  • 6 years ago
notgettingenough Manny wrote: "notgettingenough wrote: "Sigh. Thinks to self, hope to grow up enough to understand when I watch this movie that it is a masterpiece. Last time I tried I was forty-nine. I still didn't get it."

Ah come on. It's the classic SF movie. And HAL regularly makes the top ten in All Time Greatest Movie Villain competitions. What do you want, Citizen Kane? "


Well, I was gutted when they killed Hal off. What did they do that for? He was the best bit.
  • 6 years ago
Manny notgettingenough wrote: "Sigh. Thinks to self, hope to grow up enough to understand when I watch this movie that it is a masterpiece. Last time I tried I was forty-nine. I still didn't get it."

Ah come on. It's the classic SF movie. And HAL regularly makes the top ten in All Time Greatest Movie Villain competitions. What do you want, Citizen Kane?
  • 6 years ago
notgettingenough Sigh. Thinks to self, hope to grow up enough to understand when I watch this movie that it is a masterpiece. Last time I tried I was forty-nine. I still didn't get it.
  • 6 years ago
Manny Well, I did quite like the book. But the film is a masterpiece, and it just wouldn't be reasonable to say that of Clarke's novel, even if it is perfectly competent.
  • 6 years ago
K.D. Absolutely Unfortunately, most of the best bits in the movie aren't in the book.

Does this mean the movie is better than the book?
  • 6 years ago