Louise's Reviews > Masters of Command: Alexander, Hannibal, Caesar, and the Genius of Leadership

Masters of Command by Barry S. Strauss
Rate this book
Clear rating

's review
Jul 26, 2012

it was amazing
bookshelves: roman-history, leadership, biography, military-hist-policy

Good analysis of the leadership qualities of the three great commanders of the ancient world. Strauss discusses each of their campaigns and the political environment in which they took place.

Strauss notes that all three had to go to war: Alexander needed a successful conquest to earn respect in the kingship he inherited; Caesar had too many enemies to distinguish himself in Rome; and Hannibal had limited career options in Carthage or Spain and perhaps none outside of the military. This makes you ponder how much of war is waged, throughout history to today, for career purposes.

While these commanders had brilliant careers, they had weaknesses and there were losses among their historic wins. Both Caesar and Alexander, who inspired incredible loyalty, experienced mutinies. Alexander didn't grasp the strategic importance of a navy. Hannibal had great tactics but, overall, poor strategy. One, among many interesting observations is that while all were great, none of them really ended their war(s) in a satisfactory way.

Military parts are written in a way the general reader can understand, which puts the focus on the discussion of leadership.
3 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Masters of Command.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Started Reading
July 25, 2012 – Finished Reading
July 26, 2012 – Shelved
July 26, 2012 – Shelved as: roman-history
July 26, 2012 – Shelved as: leadership
September 9, 2012 – Shelved as: biography
November 27, 2012 – Shelved as: military-hist-policy

No comments have been added yet.