Old-Barbarossa's Reviews > The Lord of the Rings
The Lord of the Rings (The Lord of the Rings, #1-3)
by J.R.R. Tolkien
by J.R.R. Tolkien
OK, first of all I know some folk love this and I'm not saying they shouldn't. Everyone has different tastes.
I read this on my second attempt. I tried first when I was in my teens and found it dull, I gave up around page 100 or so. I finally read it years back in my early 30s, but although it was still dull I gave it the benefit of the doubt and finished it. My opinion changed from dull to dull and not that big a deal.
It seems to be full of: long descriptions of folk walking about (dull); elf poetry (dull); pantomime style bad guys (yawn); hobbits (oh, they irritate me...).
Again I say it wasn't for me. I'm treading carefully here as I realise some folk are fairly into JRRT, learning elfish (elvan?), memorising family trees etc. If you're a JRRT fanboy please re-read this paragraph before replying, I'm not trying to insult you (unless you can actually translate this into dwarf runes), merely aknowledge that these books can encourage a level of evangelical response that I recognise but don't personnaly get.
Before coming to this I had been exposed to faster paced fantasy tales from the early 20th cent. and as a result found JRRT slow, very slow. Also I'd read many of the sources he draws from so found the world derivative at times.
Having said that, I think that if you like big wordy novels and haven't read any other fantasy this may be the thing for you.
And before anyone suggests re-reading LOTR, life's too short...I have other books to read...even other books (that I enjoyed the first time) to re-read.
In summary: I found LOTR dull, dull, dull.
I read this on my second attempt. I tried first when I was in my teens and found it dull, I gave up around page 100 or so. I finally read it years back in my early 30s, but although it was still dull I gave it the benefit of the doubt and finished it. My opinion changed from dull to dull and not that big a deal.
It seems to be full of: long descriptions of folk walking about (dull); elf poetry (dull); pantomime style bad guys (yawn); hobbits (oh, they irritate me...).
Again I say it wasn't for me. I'm treading carefully here as I realise some folk are fairly into JRRT, learning elfish (elvan?), memorising family trees etc. If you're a JRRT fanboy please re-read this paragraph before replying, I'm not trying to insult you (unless you can actually translate this into dwarf runes), merely aknowledge that these books can encourage a level of evangelical response that I recognise but don't personnaly get.
Before coming to this I had been exposed to faster paced fantasy tales from the early 20th cent. and as a result found JRRT slow, very slow. Also I'd read many of the sources he draws from so found the world derivative at times.
Having said that, I think that if you like big wordy novels and haven't read any other fantasy this may be the thing for you.
And before anyone suggests re-reading LOTR, life's too short...I have other books to read...even other books (that I enjoyed the first time) to re-read.
In summary: I found LOTR dull, dull, dull.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
The Lord of the Rings.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
| 03/01/2016 | marked as: | read | ||
Comments (showing 1-10 of 10) (10 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Zinny
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Apr 08, 2011 03:11AM
Maybe your'e just dull
reply
|
flag
*
Ohhh, Zinny...did I strike a nerve at some point in the review? Was it my confusion over elfish/elvan?
For what it's worth, I shared your opinion until I read them aloud to my children. What had been dull to me became truly alive.
Mike wrote: "Which faster paced fantasy tales do you believe influenced Tolkien and the Lord of the Rings?"Don't think any did...which was kind of my point.
He was influenced by loads of old sagas though...and even they are pretty abrupt by comparison to TOTR.





