Josiah Richardson's Reviews > Scientific Creationism
Scientific Creationism
by
by
This was actually very good and only lost a star because so much has changed since it was written 50 years ago. Morris rightly attacks naturalism and it's foundations. At some level, you have to be ignoring the role of a creator at least statistically speaking. Much of Morris's argument rests on the fine-tuning argument of ole', and it's a good argument.
There were moments 50 years ago where things Morris wrote were absolute lynchpins. But today, some things he said couldn't have happened or could not be proven have happened and have been proved. One of the crazy things about our generation is that 5 years of scientific findings and research today would have taken 500 years last millennium. We are a society that is constantly searching for new truths, in often wrong places. But for what Morris set our to do here, which was dismantle naturalistic Darwinism, he did well.
There were moments 50 years ago where things Morris wrote were absolute lynchpins. But today, some things he said couldn't have happened or could not be proven have happened and have been proved. One of the crazy things about our generation is that 5 years of scientific findings and research today would have taken 500 years last millennium. We are a society that is constantly searching for new truths, in often wrong places. But for what Morris set our to do here, which was dismantle naturalistic Darwinism, he did well.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Scientific Creationism.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
October 12, 2020
–
Started Reading
October 12, 2020
– Shelved
November 15, 2020
– Shelved as:
creation-evolution
November 15, 2020
–
Finished Reading
